|
Note: The National Geographic has just done a great feature on China. The following
video featuring the rise of the Chinese middle class (courtesy of our
poster rffrydr at our MarketThoughts
discussion forum) is a must-see.
Dear Subscribers,
Let us begin our commentary with a review of our 7 most recent signals in
our DJIA
Timing System:
1st signal entered: 50% long position on September 7, 2006 at 11,385;
2nd signal entered: Additional 50% long position on September 25, 2006 at
11,505;
3rd signal entered: 100% long position SOLD on May 8, 2007 at 13,299, giving
us gains of 1,914 and 1,794 points, respectively.
4th signal entered: 50% short position on October 4, 2007 at 13,956;
5th signal entered: 50% short position COVERED on January 9, 2008 at 12,630,
giving us a gain of 1,326 points.
6th signal entered: 50% long position on January 9, 2008 at 12,630, giving
us a gain of 219.36 points as of last week at the close.
7th signal entered: Additional 50% long position on January 22, 2008 at 11,715,
giving us a gain of 1,134.36 points as of last week at the close.
As of the close last Friday, both our latest buy signals in our DJIA Timing
System are in the green. Readers who are interested in the historical performance
(as of March 31, 2008) of our DJIA Timing System can refer to our comments
from a couple of weeks ago (The
End of "Market Fundamentalism"). Excluding dividends, our DJIA Timing System
returned 13.76% over the last 12 months, beating the Dow Industrials return
of -0.74%, and with lower volatility. Again, our next update would be for the
period ending June 30, 2008 - with a move to a semi-annual update schedule
thereafter.
Before we go on and outline our thoughts for where the markets are heading
in the next six months, I want to do some "house cleaning.". Specifically,
in response to subscribers' assertion that demographics may not do much to
alleviate the housing crisis (i.e. will the creation of an extra 150,000 households
a year really make a difference, given that home sales are currently running
at around 6 million a year?), subscribers should remember that one should always
focus on available stock (inventory), as opposed to volume (or turnover in
houses) as a sign of potentially bottoming housing prices. While volume had
been a leading indicator of declining housing prices over the last six months,
it is always existing and new housing inventory, general income levels, and
demand that will have a bigger impact on housing prices going forward. According
to the IMF, new homes inventory is currently running at slightly less than
500,000 homes, as shown in the below chart:

If we include existing homes, total inventory for single-family homes in the
U.S. is currently around 2.25 million, up from 2.2 million a year go and from
1.55 million a couple of years ago (source: Census.gov). Giving that existing
housing starts (see our mid-week
commentary last week) are currently running around 500,000 to 600,000 (on
an annualized basis) below the historical average, a 150,000 increase in annual
demand for single-family homes suddenly does not seem so trivial. More importantly
- should the U.S. government's plan to grant tax credits to first-time homebuyers
come to fruition, this could potentially push younger homebuyers (more of the
Y-gens) into buying homes sooner rather than later. As far as I know, no one
has tried to model the effects of a $5,000 to $10,000 tax credit for first-time
homebuyers (one reason is that there is no historical precedent for this) -
but this could have a substantial impact on reducing existing housing inventories
and cushioning housing prices over the next 12 months, especially given the
dramatic increases in the housing affordability index over the last six months,
as shown in the following chart from the IMF:

Again, I am not calling for the end of the housing correction just yet. The
purpose of my arguments in this commentary, as well as in our mid-week commentary
last week, is merely to suggest that there are significant and countervailing
forces to the current decline in U.S. housing prices - most of which should
be taken seriously by the housing bears. In the meantime, subscribers should
keep an eye on the inevitable Option ARMS resets starting in mid 2009, but
given that this is still 14 months away (and is a well-publicized fact), it
is still too early to factor this into your general investment decisions, unless
one is thinking of investing in companies that are holding these securities,
such as Wachovia or Washington Mutual. Another data point that needs tracking
is global economic growth. If global economic growth starts to falter - then
some of our higher-priced markets that have gotten support from foreign buying,
such as parts of Los Angeles and Manhattan, may start to weaken as well.
Let us now discuss our roadmap for the next six months. First of all, here
is my current perspective on the stubborn rise in LIBOR. The latest rise in
LIBOR last Friday occurred before the latest Bank of England's US$100 billion
plans to reliquify the British banking system became news. Aside from allowing
banks to borrow from the Bank of England by swapping high-quality mortgages
assets as collateral, this plan will also allow banks to post unsecured credit
card debt as collateral. The latter was unexpected, and should definitely alleviate
the upward pressure on LIBOR. Moreover, the Bank of England and the UK government
- in return - is also asking banks to prop up their balance sheets. Again,
there is no lack of capital on the sidelines and certainly not in the government
coffers or in institutions such as the IMF or sovereign wealth funds. My sense
is that the Bank of England announcement will come with a promise to do more
should strains in the UK financial system fail to abate. More importantly,
investors have continued to show interest in taking significant stakes in banks
(albeit at significant discounts as the latest $6 to $8 billion National City
injection demonstrates), suggesting that LIBOR will definitely come down at
some point. In the unlikely scenario that the Pound Sterling come under attack,
the Bank of England can always be backstopped by the IMF - which has a $300
billion balance sheet (if you mark to market their 100 million ounces of gold
from $9 billion to $90 billion) and which is desperate to increase their loan
portfolio and make themselves relevant again. While this is not a good development
for common stock shareholders in many of these institutions, this is definitely
a good development for the global financial system as a whole and no doubt
for the global economy as well. Finally, according to Bank of America, the
leveraged loan backlog sitting on banks' balance sheets has declined dramatically
from approximately $240 billion last summer to just over $100 billion as of
last week. Assuming that Deutsche Bank goes through with its latest scheme
to get rid of about $15
to $20 billion of LBO debt from its balance sheets, the total global leveraged
loan backlog could easily decline to under $90 billion by the end of this month.
Sensing this, the leveraged loan market rallied substantially last week, and
is no longer a significant drag on the financial and equity markets.
Second of all, I expect the rally in the S&P 500 to continue for the next
several months, as the record amount of capital on the sidelines come back
to the financial markets and as the effects of the "fiscal stimulus" kicks
in. With regards to the latter - despite the many surveys concluding that the
majority of Americans will either invest/save their rebate checks or use them
to pay down debts - subscribers should remember the adage that we should watch
what we do, not what we say. There is no question that many of us mean well,
but the 2001 experience shows
otherwise. All of us would like to save, but we just do not have the discipline.
Similar to the 2001 "tax rebate" experience, my sense is that much of the fiscal
stimulus would have already been spent on discretionary goods/services six
months after the checks are mailed out, especially since we are already in
a lower interest rate environment relative to when the tax rebates were mailed
out during 2001. Based on a recent study by the IMF (see page 73 of the IMF's
latest World Economic Outlook) - a fiscal stimulus of this size, combined
with monetary easing - is definitely significant in terms of its ability to
assist GDP growth 3 to 12 months down the road.
More follows for subscribers...
|
Henry K. To, CFA
MarketThoughts.com
Henry To, CFA, is co-founder and partner of the economic advisory firm, MarketThoughts
LLC, an advisor to the hedge fund Independence Partners, LP. Marketthoughts.com
is a service provided by MarkertThoughts LLC, and provides a twice-a-week commentary
designed to educate subscribers about the stock market and the economy beyond
the headlines. This commentary usually involves focusing on the fundamentals
and technicals of the current stock market, but may also include individual
sector and stock analyses - as well as more general investing topics such as
the Dow Theory, investing psychology, and financial history.
In January 2000, Henry To, CFA of MarketThoughts LLC alerted his friends and
associates about the huge risks created by the historic speculative environment
in both the domestic and the international stock markets. Through a series
of correspondence
and e-mails during January to early April 2000, he discussed his reasons
and the implications of this historic mania, and suggested that the best solution
was to sell all the technology stocks in ones portfolio. He also alerted his
friends and associates about the possible ending of the bear market in gold
later in 2000, and suggested that it was the best time to accumulate gold mining
stocks with both the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Mining Index and the American
Exchange Gold Bugs Index at a value of 40 (today, the value of those indices
are at approximately 110 and 240, respectively).Readers who are interested
in a 30-day trial of our commentaries can find out more information from our MarketThoughts
subscription page.
Copyright © 2005-2009 MarketThoughts.com
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|