|
"...Apparent defender of US cash savers since the Great Depression, the
FDIC wants to see $50bn pumped into the very worst mortgages issued in 2004-2007..."
AS THE U.S. and British housing bubbles continue to deflate, leaking
stale gas like an air-bed blown up when you're drunk, just how much trouble
will come from government schemes aimed at saving over-geared debtors and over-lent
lenders?
"Too many unaffordable mortgages are causing a never-ending cycle - a whirlpool
of falling house prices and limited refinancing options that contribute to
more defaults, foreclosures and the ballooning of the housing stock."
So said Sheila Bair - head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) -
in a speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington D.C. last Friday. Spying
the same problem that the British government here in London now faces, she
wants to see the housing slump fixed - even though it's not strictly within
her brief - and quick.
But seeing how the FDIC has closed three US banks already this year, and given
its own claim that lenders lose 40% or more of each mortgage that falls into
foreclosure, maybe it's worth asking: Just how worried is the FDIC about the
housing slump turning into widespread financial failure?
Because for an agency charged with protecting cash savings, it's sure got
a weird way of defending the value of cash today.
"We are now undergoing a self-reinforcing cycle of default, foreclosure, home
price declines, and mortgage credit contraction," says the FDIC's full proposal
on its website, "the likes of which we have not experienced since the 1930s."
The FDIC itself, of course, was born during that decade - but only after more
than 5,000 banks went under in the United States, often destroying people's
entire life savings as they sank. To climb out of the Great Depression, the
US then needed a deposit insurance scheme, said President Roosevelt in March
1933, because it "had a bad banking situation.
"Some of our bankers had shown themselves either incompetent or dishonest...[using]
the money entrusted to them in speculations and unwise loans."
Now the FDIC - along with the Federal Reserve - is trying to contain the mess
caused by "speculations and unwise loans" once again. Off-plan flippers and
mortgage-backed bonds have taken the place of shoeshine boys and Wall Street
investment trusts. But the nuts and bolts remain the same - "excessive leveraging,
misrepresentation, insider conflicts of interest, non-transparency, and the
triumph of engineered euphoria over evidence," as Robert Kuttner, editor of
the American Prospect, put it in testimony to the House Financial Services
Committee last October.
"The financial economy...is dangerously unsound," he went on. "And as every
student of economic history knows, depressions - ever since the South Sea bubble
- originate in excesses in the financial economy, and go on to ruin the real
economy."
Desperate times call for desperate remedies, of course. Witness the ever-muddled
response from the British government here in London, for example. Both timid
and bold as always - and therefore impotent at great expense - Gordon Brown
is opting to buy unsold units straight from the home-builders, and then rent
them out to lower-income young buyers.
But the prime minister's only putting up £200 million ($389m) of taxpayers'
money, enough to buy a mere 2,000 properties at current prices. And while offering
first-time buyers an extra cash gift of £1,500 (some $2,900) to help
with their costs, that won't even cover the sales tax he then claws back on
completion.
Similarly in the United States, unsold houses - dumped on the market as a
result of record high foreclosure rates - are now depressing home prices, thus
denting new loans and refinancing still further. That dents house prices once
again, leaving 11 months worth of unsold units sitting on home-builders' balance
sheets last month, an all-time record surfeit.
None of which does anything to boost incomes or profit in the finance industry,
strung out as it is on "innovative" consumer credit. Nor does unsold inventory
help the construction industry - source here in Britain of 8.2% of annual economic
output, according to the Dept. for Trade & Investment.
One in every 14 employees in the UK, it adds, now works in the building trade.
So the whirlpool that Sheila Bair sees in the US threatens to pull down more
than just Florida condos.
"Frankly, things may get worse before they get better," said the chair of
the FDIC in Washington on Friday. "As regulators, we continue to see a lot
of distress out there." And as a regulator, of course, she can't see a problem
without offering taxpayers' cash as the answer - and it's those loans which
were "unaffordable" right from the start she wants to see tackled. The FDIC
is asking the US government to put taxpayers on the hook for $50 billion. The
very worst mortgage loans of 2004-2007 will benefit.
"We need to help those who can't afford their mortgage as opposed to those
who just lost value," as Bair explained to Mike Benbow of the Everett HeraldNet last
week. The cash-saver's champion wants the Treasury to issue "Home Ownership
Preservation" loans (or "HOP" for short), which will let home-buyers who took
out an unaffordable loan pay off 20% of their mortgage instantly.
"Mortgage holders [meaning lenders] would get the cash and restructure the
remaining 80% into fixed rate, affordable payments," says Bair - "and they
would agree to pay the government's interest for the first five years. That
way, the HOP loans would be interest-free to the borrower for the first five
years."
If you're interested in enjoying an interest-free mortgage until 2013, then...
#1. Check that your mortgage was approved between New Year's Day 2003
and the end of June 2007. During that window, average home prices in the 10
biggest metropolitan areas rose by one half. They'd already risen by 73% over
the previous five years, however;
#2. Make sure your mortgage now equals no more than 125% of the average
home price in your local area. For fancier homes in fancier areas, it can run
up to 175% if local house prices are deemed "high cost" by the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA);
#3. Finally cast your mind back - you could not afford this mortgage
right from the word go, correct?
To help you with Step Three, the FDIC - which will play no part, it seems,
in funding or administering this scheme - sets a simple hurdle:
Did your monthly housing costs, back in the very first month of your loan,
total 40% or more of your gross monthly income?
Bair reckons she'll help one million home-buyers on this metric, funding "unwise" loans
to keep foreclosure rates down. This ratio of repayments-to-earnings measures
your "front-end" debt to income (DTI) alone; it doesn't take any other debts
or monthly repayments into account. It simply includes your direct home-buying
costs - mortgage payment, property tax, home-owner's insurance, plus any housing
association fees.
Most lenders like to see a front-end DTI around 28%, says John Crenshaw -
the loan officer from Southern California behind Truthfullending.com. So the
FDIC's proposals, starting with that $50bn loan from the Treasury, would seem
to target only the most speculative loans made by US mortgage originators.
But hey, that's where the trouble sits, right?
Never mind the precedent this scheme sets for future lending and debt. And
who cares what this $50bn injection - pumped right into the heart of the mortgage
crisis - will do to the value of the cash deposits that Bair's organization
insures on behalf of more prudent savers?
Like the US Dollar itself, they're getting precious little protection from
the Federal Reserve; not with interest rates now almost 2% below the rate of
consumer-price inflation. And whether this scheme means foreclosure averted
or merely delayed, we can't see here at BullionVault how
this big money fix will ever prevent speculation in unaffordable mortgages
in future.
We also wonder why the FDIC is asking government to inflate away the value
of cash savings, increasing the supply of money to lenders who made what were
very "unwise" decisions between 2003 and mid-2007.
Maybe the FDIC knows something we don't? Ah, but as Sheila Bair herself said HeraldNet last
week, "people are trying to scare others so they can sell them Gold and
stuff like that."
Whereas the FDIC wants to scare people into approving a $50-bn package for
over-geared debtors and lenders.
|