|
The Treasury market was essentially unchanged last week. As discussed in last
week's edition, ongoing weakness in the real economy and renewed turmoil in
the stock market are providing solid support for bonds. The event that got
the most visible market reaction last week was the release of the FOMC meeting
minutes. The Fed reduced economic growth forecasts for 2008 by about 1% from
1.7 to 0.7%. They kept dreaming about 2.5% growth in 2009. As previously mentioned
the market does not yet believe that sluggish or no growth will persist, so
the Fed downgrade came as a surprise and severely dampened enthusiasm for the
stock market while boosting the appeal of Treasury bonds. Our readers who bought
bonds and sold stocks on our recommendation from 2 weeks ago were feeling pretty
warm and fuzzy. That trade has a bit more upside left, so do not abandon that
ship just as yet.
One topic that has been discussed with increasing regularity by bond market
participants is the accuracy of the inflation data in the United States. How
in the world is it possible for the US to have a core inflation rate around
2% - and headline inflation around 4% - while a country like China, whose currency
has appreciated 7-8% per year versus the US Dollar, has an inflation rate well
north of 8%? China is only one of dozens of countries that has substantially
higher inflation and an appreciating currency relative to the US. The essential
question is: does it really matter though? Treasury bond yields out to 10 years
are negative even with the incredibly "rigged" US data. Also, in this information
age are there any self-respecting bond traders or fixed income portfolio managers
who are not aware of the hedonic quality adjustments to CPI or the way the
housing component is manipulated through "owner's equivalent rent"? I will
give lots of credit to the bond crowd and stipulate that they are aware of
the above outlined issues. So a, how much is US inflation understated by, which
begs the question b, how negative are Treasury bond yields in reality and c,
how could the bond vigilantes let this happen? My answer to a, (and at the
same time b) is that calculating inflation is more of an art than a science,
so while there is no black and white answers, even if we just take the pre-1990
way of measuring CPI, it would put inflation north of 7%, which at least would
be in line with inflation rates in developing countries (without currency value
adjustments). Some folks would argue that those numbers are low-balling reality.
So that would put Fed Funds at a negative real rate of larger than 5% and long
bond yield real rate of approximately 3%, with the rest of the curve somewhere
in between those figures. That gets us to c, if all this info is out there,
how can Treasury yields be so low? The answer is shockingly simple, the bond
market is telling us that the situation out there is soooooo desperate that
the Fed needs to have the curve anchored at a larger than -5% real rate in
order to provide enough stimulus to keep not only the real economy but also
the financial system from capsizing. Only time will tell if -5% will do the
job, but my bet is that it will NOT get GDP growth to 2.5% in 2009.
NOTEWORTHY: The economic data calendar was light last week. A rising
stock market helped Leading Economic Indicators show a "massive" 0.1% increase
for the second month running. PPI curiously only increased 0.2% on the headline
figure but it was up 0.4% on the core component. Chalk another one up to "seasonal
adjustments". Weekly Jobless Claims decreased 9k to 365k last week. Existing
Home Sales "only" declined 1%, but the inventory of unsold homes rose to 11.2
months and prices declined 8% year over year. Not much to chear about in my
humble opinion. Next week's headliners will include Consumer Confidence surveys
along with New Home Sales, Personal Income and Spending.
INFLUENCES: Trader surveys have trended down for the past month and
remain in neutral territory on bonds during the latest week. The Commitment
of Traders reports have indicated that the commercials have a long bias in
their positioning. Last week's data showed that Commercial traders were net
long 182k 10 year Treasury Note futures equivalents - a decrease of 60k. The
COT data is neutral with a slight positive bias. Seasonals are positive. The
10 year yield remains below support in the 3.9 to 4% area for now. The positive
factors are dominant, so I expect a bullish bias to persist here.
RATES: The US Long Bond future traded up 1/8 to close at 116-19, while
the yield on the US 10-year note decreased 1 basis point to 3.84%. The yield
curve was flatter but I am expecting that the curve will retain a steepening
bias. Long-short accounts can take advantage of the steepening trend by buying
2 year Treasuries against selling 10 year Treasuries on a risk weighted basis
using cash or futures. This spread was unchanged at 141 during the past week.
It looks like the curve steepener has run into solid resistance at the 200
level. This may take months to overcome. In the mean time the range is expected
to be 140 to 200.
CORPORATES: Corporate bonds remain overvalued, especially the weaker
credits.
BOTTOM LINE: Bond yields were unchanged last week. The fundamental
backdrop remains bleak in spite of increasing inflationary pressures. Trader
sentiment and COT positions are neutral, while the technical setup and seasonal
influences are supportive. My recommendation is to add to the curve steepener,
continue to shun the weaker corporate credits. My bias remains bullish across
the yield curve until 4% is convincingly breached on the 10 Year Treasury Note.
|