|
"...Take a gun-boat and 1,200 tonnes of opium, and America could close
its trade gap with China tomorrow..."
DO DEFICITS MATTER? Right around the time that English missionaries
produced the first Bible in Chinese, the British Empire found itself with a
trickier kind of translation problem.
Exporting the English language to China - and a little Protestant godliness
besides - was proving much easier than exporting British-made goods.
Imports from abroad, in contrast, just kept on growing as the industrial revolution
steamed ahead at home, sucking in the new consumer favorites - tobacco, sugar,
coffee, calicoes, porcelain and silk.
By the early 19th century, of course, Britain owned the plantations of the
West Indies and the factories of Bengal. So those deficits didn't even exist,
let alone matter. But "the British were spectacularly unsuccessful in finding
trade goods that the Chinese wanted or needed," as Jonathan Spence, professor
of history at Yale, noted in his Reith Lectures for the BBC earlier
this week.
Thus "there was the problem of trade imbalances." And stuck for consumer items
to ship back across the oceans, London's merchants were forced to pay in cash.
For the British, money meant gold, just as it did until the last gasp of the
Gold Standard one hundred years later. But the Chinese wanted silver.
(They never did get round to using gold, in fact. And while Britain recovered
early from the Great Depression by abandoning gold for credit-money in 1931,
one theory holds that China side-stepped it entirely by sticking to its silver
standard...)
Translating English pounds into Chinese yuan in the 1830s meant selling gold
for silver, and that meant dealing on Europe's precious metals market. Paying
a commission to the bullion dealers of Paris or Prussia - as well as shipping
it all back and forth - only added further to the transaction costs of running
up that yawning trade gap.
What to do? A little of the British Empire's raw cotton found a market in
China, but it wasn't nearly enough to close the trade gap. Gold bullion continued
to flow out of London, aggravating the "bullionist" school of economists and
policy-makers. They feared a shortage of coin in the domestic British economy,
plus a fall in the Pound Sterling's international value...as well as giving
work to foreign laborers, and paying profits to their foreign masters...while
leaving the London exchequer impoverished should it ever need to fund a military
defense of the home front.
And so "it was this melancholy failure of the balance of trade that led to
the under girding of the opium business in China," explains Prof. Spence. Opium
grown in India "started to be sold to the Chinese by British traders, and later
by American traders, because the West simply could not find enough products
to attract the Chinese in a sort of barter exchange at the time."
Widespread dope-smoking and the social breakdown it can invite rarely chimes
with government policy - not domestically, at least. Opium had long been banned
by imperial decree from Nanjing. But after ten years of trying to fend off
Britain's drug dealers without damaging the inflows of silver, the Qin authorities
finally cracked and made a stand, seizing 20,000 chests of the drug - some
1,200 tonnes - landed in Guangzhou.
London responded first with a gun-boat, and then the all-out Opium War of
1839. It ended three years later with the Treaty of Nanjing. Britain's military
might won the island of Hong Kong, plus reduced trade tariffs, freedom from
Chinese law for its ex-pats, as well as "most-favored nation" status.
Whatever trading rights or concessions China would grant in future, the British
Empire would also gain as well. Opium was then forced on the Chinese, and the
trade gap closed without the need for hard money payments.

We still don't make much that the Chinese want to buy. The United Kingdom's
trade deficit with China rose 8% in the year to April '08, as Chinese imports
swelled by more than 10%.
But most clearly here in the early 21st century, it's America's turn to fumble
around for a way of settling its debts with China. Yes, the value of Chinese
imports to the US fell slightly during the first four months of this year compared
with the first third of '07.
But US exports to China fell faster still according to the Census Bureau's
latest data. So the trade gap widened again to rack up a deficit three times
the size of America's debt to Canada or Mexico, the United States' No.1 and
No.3 trading partners respectively.
Canada and Mexico just happen to share a land border with the States. Whereas
China sits on the other side of the Pacific. As the British Empire's gun-boat
diplomacy of 1839 attests, however, distance means little when consumers choose
to buy luxury goods overseas.
The United States, of course, ships dollars and bonds back across the Pacific,
rather than silver or Gold bullion.
But are Dollar bills and Treasuries what China really wants, anymore than it
wanted 1,200 tonnes of dope in 1839...?
The People's Bank of China just raised the required reserves ratio - the amount
of cash which private banks must keep in reserve - to a massive 17.5%. That
should drain something like $58 billion from the domestic lending markets,
reckons the RGE Monitor, as the Chinese authorities set about "treating the
symptoms of excess liquidity."
Spooked by the risk of a further slump in the over-heated Shanghai stock market,
however, the PBoC continues to hold its key interest rate below the rate of
consumer-price inflation. That makes cash a losing asset class in China today,
just like it is in the US and UK, too.
Funnily enough, the Chinese would still rather buy and hold precious metals
apparently. China's retail investment demand for Gold rose
63% during the first quarter of 2008, reports the GFMS consultancy, amounting
to 15.1 tonnes. Gold jewelry sales grew by 9% - "one of the few examples of
demand increasing over 2007 levels" during the global spike to $1,000 per ounce
- reaching 86.6 tonnes.
China now represents the world's second-largest gold jewelry market after
India, over-taking the United States in 2007. But even at a total of 420 tonnes
last year, total demand for Gold from
mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan combined remains almost negligible on
a per capita basis.
That's not to say it's sure to keep rising; but with Chinese goods now accounting
for 13% of America's imports each month - more than Mexican goods and only
just less than Canada's (including petroleum) - we wouldn't be surprised to
see ever more of that wealth swapped for silver and gold bullion.
Because deficits do matter after all, despite what Dick Cheney claimed back
in 2002 as the Dollar's 40% decline got started.
Not least, trade deficits matter to those countries sat at the other end of
the shipping route.
|