|
In the underlying principles of the Central Bank Gold Agreement lay the
attitude of European Central Banks to gold. The agreements started as the
Euro entered the foreign exchange markets for the first time. All Central
Bank prefer paper money to gold because of the control it gives the bank
over money.
Gold has a habit of undermining the credibility of paper money, as it reflects
poor money management in falling values of the paper, as a result of this control.
So it was almost incumbent on the European Central Banks to support the new
Euro and to frown on the monetary role of gold [But not to frown on its value
as a reserve asset]. This function can be supportive of a paper currency and
a nation in times of crisis.
Once the Euro was established as an international and particularly European
currency, there was no need to frown upon gold any more; in fact, it is clear
that the secondary role of gold as a "reserve asset" should be supported.
The "Washington Agreement" was the first of the two gold sales agreements
and lasted for 5 years. During that time gold recovered and looked robust,
so it could be seen that the sales may have not done their work yet. But when
the "Central Bank Gold Agreement" began for another 5 years, it was felt that
the Euro still needed the 'support' of these sales.
Central
Bank Gold Agreement 2004-2009 |
Selling
Signatories |
Announced
Sales
2004-2009 |
Year 1
Sales |
Year 2
Sales |
Year 3
Sales |
Year 4
Sales |
Announced
Sales
Remaining
Balance |
| E.C.B. |
235 |
47 |
57 |
60 |
42 |
29 |
| Germany |
12 |
5.4
[for coins] |
5.3
[for coins] |
5
[for coins] |
|
0 |
| France |
600 |
115 |
134.8 |
115.1 |
55.6 |
179.5 |
| Netherlands |
165 |
55 |
67.5 |
14 |
23.3 |
5.2 |
| Portugal |
200 |
54.8 |
44.9 |
0 |
|
100.3 |
| Switzerland |
380 |
130 |
0 |
113 |
54.2 |
82.8 |
| Austria |
90 |
15 |
13.7 |
8.7 |
|
52.6 |
| Sweden |
60 |
15 |
10 |
10.0 |
4.0 |
21.0 |
| Spain |
0 |
30 |
62.5 |
149.3 |
|
? |
| Belgium |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
|
? |
| Not Identified |
|
? |
|
0.5 |
26.95 |
? |
| Total Sales |
1730 |
497.2 |
395.7 |
475.7 |
206.8 |
454.95 |
| Russia |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
34.8 |
|
| Greece [Coins] |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3.8 [?] |
0.8? |
|
| Total Purchases |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25.8 |
? |
|
Then the management of the $ became questionable regarding its role as the
world's reserve currency and the position of the Euro as an alternative to
the US$ came into view. During the last few years the Euro has climbed against
the $ and gained a strong reputation as a global currency. It provides the
means of exchange for over 400 million Europeans in their daily lives. It is
designed to monetarily unite a set of diverse economies that Europe has been
for well over a couple of thousand years. It has done a remarkable job to date.
So there is little need for gold sales now.
-
This has always been the opinion of the Italian Central Bank [whose history
with the Lira was dismal] and whose respect for gold was enormous.
-
Then Germany backed off from selling its gold even in the face of battles
with government ministers with little respect for gold. The Bundesbank
President, Axel Weber, made no bones about it saying that gold was "a useful counter
to the swings in the $". Germany has sold no gold in the open market during
the second agreement, selling only 5 tonnes a year for coin production
purposes.
-
The Banque de France, France's Central Bank became an unwilling seller
as the Governor of that bank lost the battle with the now President of France,
then Finance Minister, Sarkozy.
-
Switzerland, basing the value of its gold on its currency equivalent values,
focuses on the proportion of gold in its reserves, so as gold's price rose
they reasoned that they had too much relative to the value [$?] of their
currencies. Such is the trust in paper as the Swiss have sold 1200 tonnes
and then opted to sell another 250 tonnes. May they enjoy the declining $
and the dropping income from its interest rates. No doubt as time goes on
they will live to regret this decision as they see the value of currencies
decline much further against gold. As is typical of the Swiss, they said
they would sell and they are and will do so until they have sold their commitment,
but it is being done with a slack hand at the moment.
-
Britain did not enter the second Central Bank Gold Agreement, primarily
because it had sold half of its reserves before that second agreement began.
Since then, as the price of gold has climbed to almost four times the level
that Britain sold its gold at, so ridiculing the reasoning behind its sale.
The price achieved by Britain is known as the "Brown Bottom" as it was
the lowest price the market saw since pre-980.
-
Spain was quite a seller. This appears because of the poor state of that
nation's reserves and it current liabilities, not because of their desire
to get rid of gold as was the impression given at the time.
-
The other Central Banks also appear to be losing their enthusiasm for
selling gold. With sales down to such a small level now, it seems that
even the sales to be conducted, the "announced sales" may well not happen
for the same reason as they are not selling now.
It is the best performing asset in their reserves? As the global economy has
dark clouds forming above it, the times when gold comes into its own on an
international front approach again. Now is the time to retain gold.
Hence, the total gold sales of the entire number of signatories to the Central
Bank Gold Agreement have declined to a trickle of around 0 and 2 tonnes a week,
which the market barely notices.
I.M.F. Gold sales
If European Central Bank selling does dwindle to a halt well before the end
of the five year agreement then the role of gold in the monetary system would
be well confirmed and gold's value as a retainer of value would have been
re-established, which it should be. However, the Central Bank Gold Agreement
would stand in tatters and would have confirmed that Central Banks wanted
to keep the gold they have. This would most certainly encourage other private
or institutional investors to acquire gold.
Then along came the I.M.F. this mentor of global finance with its own Balance
Sheet in a mess. The gold it had 'acquired' from Brazil and Mexico, [last century]
was still under the control of its board and not in the possession of a single
[or pair] of nations anymore. This made it easier for the members to agree
to sell it. It is important to emphasize this point: they want to sell this
gold to shore up their own finances, not for any paper money support. The sales,
if the U.S. Congress approves them, have no monetary or anti- gold reason behind
them. They are to bail out an institution in trouble, that's all.
However, so as not to cause a ripple on the gold market waters, they have
already stated that they will work under the Central Bank Gold Agreement confines.
We assume they will work in the same way and under the same 'ceiling'. We understand
this to mean that they, alongside any signatory sales, will not go above the
500-tonne 'ceiling'. The reality seems even less threatening than that, as
they talk of the sales being conducted over several years. This means to us
that they will occur at such a low level that they will not even send a ripple
over the gold price itself.
We certainly don't believe that there is any collusion between the I.M.F.
and the signatories of the Central Bank Gold Agreement over gold sales.
For the full report with conclusions, please subscribe to the "Gold
Forecaster".
|
Julian D. W. Phillips
Gold-Authentic Money
"Global
Watch: The Gold Forecaster" covers the global gold market. It specializes
in Central Bank Sales and details, the Indian Bullion market [supported by
a leading Indian Bullion professional], the South African markets [+ Gold
shares shares] plus the currencies of gold producers [ Euro, U.S. $, Yen,
C$, A$, and the South African Rand]. Its aim is to synthesise all the influential
gold price factors across the globe, so as to truly understand the global
reasons behind the gold price. FIND
OUT MORE
Legal Notice / Disclaimer
This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the
solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. Gold-Authentic
Money / Julian D. W. Phillips, have based this document on information obtained
from sources it believes to be reliable but which it has not independently
verified; Gold-Authentic Money / Julian D. W. Phillips make no guarantee,
representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability as
to its accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion are those of Gold-Authentic
Money / Julian D. W. Phillips only and are subject to change without notice.
Gold-Authentic Money / Julian D. W. Phillips assume no
warranty, liability or guarantee for the current relevance, correctness or
completeness of any information provided within this Report and will not be
held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained
herein or any omission. Furthermore, we assume no liability for any direct
or indirect loss or damage or, in particular, for lost profit which you may
incur as a result of the use and existence of the information provided within
this Report.
You should be aware that the Internet is not a completely
reliable transmission medium. Neither Gold-Authentic Money / Julian D.W. Phillips
nor any of our associates accept any liability for any loss or damage, including
without limitation loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from
your inability to access the website for any reason or for any delay in or
failure of the transmission or the receipt of any instructions or notification
sent through this website. The content of this website is the property of Gold-Authentic
Money or its licensors and is protected by copyright and other intellectual
property laws. You agree not to reproduce, re-transmit or distribute the contents
herein.
Copyright © 2003-2008 Julian D. W.
Phillips
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2008
SafeHaven.com
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money:
A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo »
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|