|
The following was originally published on July 15 at www.tradingthecharts.com.
My initial rationale for seeing a top in gold earlier this year was the announcement
of the taf and other subsequent lending facilities which seemed to put some
teeth in bernanke's inflation-fighting rhetoric by giving the fed a more precise
tool in targeting the credit crisis without the blunt force trauma of significantly
lower interest rates -- even if the effective rate was frequently below the
target. With the extent of the damage to the real economy uncertain and potentially
benign, a hawkish central bank was reasonably credible given the actions they'd
taken.
But, after an initial decline, gold remained strong as risks to the banking
system seemed to persist, risks that seemed, at the time, to culminate in the
failure of bear sterns and yet another targeted fed action in its deal with
JP Morgan. Even as the fed did ultimately take down its target rate, the perception
was that steepening the yield curve would help financials recapitalize and
create earnings so that renewed systemic risks were dampened. At the same time,
gold was being overlooked in favor of oil, with its clear demand growth and
real supply shortfalls; but as shoes continued to drop in financials gold would
not, could not crash.
More recently, expectations for a lower low in gold were motivated by fears
the fed would actually hike rates by a quarter point at its last meeting, an
outcome that seemed plausible given the rise in bond yields and an environment
of surprises out of the central bank. The Fed's easing hadn't made a significant
dent in mortgage rates or the foreclosure rate. A quarter-point hike might
have broken oil and commodity prices, enticed foreign investment, and actually
drawn in home buyers looking to lock in low rates.
And yet, despite alarmist statements about the damage a fed "tightening" would
cause to stocks, we've seen a significant decline in major indices across the
board since the last meeting, which suggests cooler heads maybe should have
prevailed in June. Instead, fears of systemic risk are as high as ever and
the fed's fledgling inflation-fighting credibility is reduced to nil. The Fed's
actions in concert with treasury no longer instill confidence, but are openly
described as a "power grab" in the mainstream press. the president, seemingly
omnipotent in the realms of wire-tapping, trade negotiation, and preemptive
military strikes, is powerless in the face of a high oil prices so long as
they can be used as political leverage against congress to grant further concessions
from the national trust in benefit of oil companies.
Perhaps the lesson of the past few weeks and today especially is that if real
relief is not coming from Washington, it must come from traders themselves.
As anyone can tell you, gold's recent climb has been on the back of a renewed
decline in the dollar, rising inflation in all major currencies, and heightened
sensitivity to a possible financial collapse on a global scale. And though
housing is obviously at the center of everything crisis-related, from a trading
perspective, oil continues to be the crucial market. Only a break in the price
of oil, even more so than was seen today, can begin to create confidence, stave
off catastrophe in the credit card and commercial real estate industries, and
provide a rationale for owning stocks.

I can't see the impulsive structure in the recent gains. I'm hesitant to put
it in context of a larger count, but the series of three wave moves continue
to suggest a correction within a correction, possibly having culminated today
in a 5 of c as shown. Of note is that the major fib retrace levels, if today's
high is the top of the move, correspond nicely with existing resistance/support
at 935, 920 and 900. The 5-d sma about 960 would also be a potential support
area on any move lower.
Every day the Fed's current policy is maintained only compounds the inflation
entering the economy, keeping the likelihood of a catastrophic washout in gold
unlikely and the long term bullish prospects very good. That said, in the words
of a great contributor to this board, regression is healthy and, if we do get
follow-through on this move down in oil and commodities we'll have to judge
then how much of a regression we get. Given the environment outlined above,
it's doubtful traders will want to take the lead and sell down inflation hedges
if Washington doesn't take the lead. In my book, shorting gold is always and
everywhere an attempt to offset devaluation in physical. But, as oil showed
today, selling begets selling and this continues to be a trader's market.
Institutional traders, if you're ready to get on the team that makes
money no matter what the market environment, then maybe it's time you joined TTC.
Long time readers will remember that after two years of growing our membership
through consistently accurate and tradable market analysis, we closed our doors
recently to focus on our existing membership, largely institutional traders,
and give them a chance integrate our approach into their trading. Old habits
don't change overnight, and it usually takes weeks if not months for new members
to start making consistent gains with the resources offered at TTC. We are
a serious group of dedicated traders with only one mission: to trade profitably.
Those that take the time to learn our methods are very happy they did.
Retail traders, if you missed the chance to join earlier this year,
do not hesitate to click
here and register for the waiting list with no obligation at all. In
the very near future we will be providing the first opportunity for membership
from that list.
In the meantime, be careful out there. Be aware of what the charts are saying
in multiple markets and tune out the TV. Don't be afraid to take high risk/reward
trades, but be ready to cut your losses quickly if it's wrong. But most of
all, be unbiased.
|