| |
| |
Merk Insights provide the Merk Perspective on
currencies, global imbalances, the trade deficit, the socio-economic impact
of the U.S. administration's policies and more.
Don't miss an Insight:
Sign up for our Newsletter
The Archive:
Read past
Merk Insights |
| |
Europe was all but written off on Tuesday when Gordon Brown, the UK prime
minister announced late in the day that £50 billion (about $85 billion)
may be injected into several of the biggest banks. The details known so far
are that eligible banks can issue preference shares to the government; the
Bank of England makes another £200 billion of liquidity available in
the short-term markets; and a further £250 billion of government guarantees
are issued to help banks in their funding needs. We have been arguing that
recapitalizing banks is the most effective way to support financial institutions
(see
our analysis of the $700 billion bailout package). Just as important, however,
is that a European government was able to act. The British approach may serve
as a model for the rest of Europe and possibly the US as well. Already, the
Italian government has indicated that they will follow suit. The reason bank
re-capitalizations are so much more effective is because fresh capital may
be used with leverage; with fresh capital, financial institutions are free
to employ a market based solution to their bad assets. In the UK model, other
than the dilution of issuing shares, there is no penalty associated with the
government support. While this may draw the ire of the public, it may encourage
private investors to follow suit; the reason private investors have been reluctant
to provide capital to financial institutions is because, at least in the US,
equity holders have been wiped out whenever the government has provided support.
We saw a coordinated rate cut around the world Tuesday morning. Central banks
around the world had waited with a coordinated cut until they saw a chance
that such a cut would have an impact. For that, the program announced earlier
this week by the Federal Reserve (Fed) to buy commercial paper was a necessary
pre-condition; the Fed may now also pay interest on deposits. These programs
may help to unlock the frozen money markets; the coordinated rate cut is intended
as jumpstarting these markets that have been in cardiac arrest. If the money
markets are frozen it does not matter what rates the Fed is charging. The design
of the commercial paper program will help but may not be sufficient as the
Fed will buy directly from corporations rather than act in the secondary market;
the challenge with that approach is that rather than acting as a clearing agent,
the market may outsource the commercial paper market to the Fed. This is still
a relief to banks that can now protect their lines of credit, but will still
make money market funds reluctant to buy commercial paper as it may not be
possible to sell any securities acquired; however, it does remove the "rollover
risk", the risk that firms can refinance any maturing paper.
During the credit expansion, European Central Bank (ECB) Trichet had been
arguing that ECB policy was not tight despite widespread criticism; his argument
was that credit was easily available and the level of interest rates didn't
matter as much. Using the same argument, the ECB now has leeway to cut rates
without giving up its mandate on price stability. Because inter-bank lending
rates are very high, the ECB's lowering of rates is merely an attempt at adjusting
the market's rates to the level the ECB desires. The media spins the coordinated
rate cut more as providing cover to the ECB; we believe that while the coordinated
rate cut is certainly appreciated, the ECB is not wandering away from its mandate
of price stability.
Indeed, by trying to stabilize the financial system in earnest now, we are
moving to a new phase in adjustment of the global imbalances. In the current
phase, should the governments succeed to stabilize financial institutions,
we will allow an economic contraction to take place in an orderly, rather than
chaotic manner. This is a deflationary force that central banks, in particular
the Federal Reserve, may fight vigorously; this may cause problems down the
road; gold is already signaling that this may eventually be inflationary; the
dollar may follow suit versus other currencies.
A beneficiary of the current phase is the Japanese yen. The Japanese banking
system appears now more stable than the banking system of any other country.
The Bank of Japan (BOJ), while supportive of the coordinated rate cut, did
not participate. Not only are the ultra-low interest rates in Japan now less
extra-ordinary because of the rate cuts elsewhere; more importantly, the BOJ
has shown restraint and prudence in recent months. This may well be a reflection
that boosting exports by weakening the yen may prove ineffective in a weakening
global economy rather than the BOJ suddenly adopting a stoic attitude. However,
we are sufficiently encouraged to elevate the Japanese yen to the family of
hard currencies. We have argued for some time that the Japanese economy could
absorb a stronger yen - with pain, but without crumbling.
We manage the Merk Hard and Asian Currency Funds, no-load mutual funds seeking
to protect against a decline in the dollar by investing in baskets of hard
and Asian currencies, respectively. To learn more about the Funds, or to subscribe
to our free newsletter, please visit www.merkfund.com.
Please also register
for our free webinar on October 15, 2008, to get an update on our views
on the economy and the markets.
|
Axel Merk
Axel Merk is Manager of the Merk Hard Currency
Fund
The
Merk Hard Currency Fund is a no-load mutual fund that invests in a basket of
hard currencies from countries with strong monetary policies assembled to protect
against the depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies. The
Fund may serve as a valuable diversification component as it seeks to protect
against a decline in the dollar while potentially mitigating stock market,
credit and interest risks - with the ease of investing in a mutual fund.
The Fund may be appropriate for you if you are pursuing
a long-term goal with a hard currency component to your portfolio; are willing
to tolerate the risks associated with investments in foreign currencies; or
are looking for a way to potentially mitigate downside risk in or profit from
a secular bear market. For more information on the Fund and to download a prospectus,
please visit www.merkfund.com.
Investors should consider the investment objectives,
risks and charges and expenses of the Merk Hard Currency Fund carefully before
investing. This and other information is in the prospectus, a copy of which
may be obtained by visiting the Funds website at www.merkfund.com or calling
866-MERK FUND. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.
The Fund primarily invests in foreign currencies and
as such, changes in currency exchange rates will affect the value of what
the Fund owns and the price of the Funds shares. Investing in foreign instruments
bears a greater risk than investing in domestic instruments for reasons such
as volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic
focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets.
The Fund is subject to interest rate risk which is the risk that debt securities
in the Fund's portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market
interest rates. As a non-diversified fund, the Fund will be subject to more
investment risk and potential for volatility than a diversified fund because
its portfolio may, at times, focus on a limited number of issuers. The Fund
may also invest in derivative securities which can be volatile and involve
various types and degrees of risk. For a more complete discussion of these
and other Fund risks please refer to the Fund's prospectus. Foreside
Fund Services, LLC, distributor.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|