|
If you had to choose one word to describe this year, it would probably be "volatile." That
2008 was characterized by volatility is an understatement. Such volatility
hasn't been seen in decades.
Not only was price volatility at an extreme this year but so was share turnover. Take
a look at the following chart of the NYSE Composite Index for 2008. The
red dots indicate the number of times the upside/downside or downside/upside
trading volume ratio was beyond the boundary that has historically characterized "overbought" or "oversold." Needless
to say 2008 was a record year in terms of volume turnover.

We hear much discussion over volatility but few know how to define it. "Volatility
is an external manifestation of underlying internal economic instability." That's
how my colleague Bud Kress defines the dominant market environment we've
all been subjected to these past three months. That's certainly
one way of putting it, although there's also a more practical way of
explaining it. Indeed, Mr. Kress' cycles probably provide an even
better answer as to why super volatility has beleaguered the financial market
in recent months.
Extreme volatility is itself a form of change. It's a state of
flux wherein nothing remains constant and little or no progress is made. This
year's motif in the political realm, in fact, has been that of change. "Change
now!" has been the rallying cry for millions seeking salvation from this
year's financial turmoil. Change has definitely characterized the
economic realm, which in turn is the progenitor of political sentiment. The
year 2008 has been one of great change in the monetary and economic realms
with the result that millions have demanded change in the political realm. But
as someone has said, if people are kept in a constant state of change they
never arrive at anything. Thus we see that hyper volatility is the very
antithesis of progress.
What was responsible for the extreme volatility of 2008? Many pundits
pinned the blame on speculators, short sellers, hedge funds, and a host of
other culprits. Most of them fell short of the mark in discovering the
underlying cause for the volatility. The answer, as usual, is to be found
in forces beyond our immediate sight.
It was the combination of the opposing Kress cycles with the confidence crisis
that forced much of this year's volatility onto the market. The
confidence crisis was in turn a creation of the Fed's tight money policy
since 2004. The market was able to shrug off this tightness to a large
extent from 2004 until 2007. But when the Kress 2-year cycle peaked in
October 2007 it began the turmoil that would be seen in 2008 when the Kress
6-year cycle bottomed simultaneous with the 12-year cycle peak. Adding
to this volatility was the fact that the Kress composite interim cycle is bottoming
in December. Thus we had three major cyclical occurrences in the same
year, a rare event to be sure.
The volatility in recent months has indeed been extremely rough but with the
bottoming of the Kress interim weekly cycle this month, we should finally witness
a declining in market volatility and along with it the advent of a kinder,
gentler trading environment. This seismic volatility has been mainly
a function of the cyclical cross-currents since September as discussed. In
September-October the 6-year cycle was bottoming while the 12-year cycle was
peaking, producing a ramp up in the Volatility Index (VIX) to all-time highs. Then,
after the 6-year cycle bottomed in October, the duel in November-December has
been between the newly formed 6-year up cycle versus the major composite weekly
cycle bottom scheduled for around Dec. 18-21. Dueling cycles always produce
major increases in volatility.
Now that the 12-year cycle peak has done its damage, however, the 6-year up
cycle is starting to assert itself. It's probable that this important
major cycle will overpower the composite weekly cycle scheduled to bottom in
a few days and produce a higher low at the upcoming cycle bottom. The
bear market price low could therefore be (and is probably) already in for the
SPX and the recent improvement in the NYSE hi-lo differential is a strong case
in point. Once the Kress interim cycle bottoms later this month the market
will be free of all intermediate term cyclical constraints and should be able
to commence a new cyclical bull market heading into 2009.
Moreover, the important 10-year cycle is peaking in 2009 and should also support
a recovery in the first half of the new year. This time, unlike 2008,
the three nearest major Kress cycles (including the 6-year and 10-year cycles)
will be in harmony on the upside instead of at odds. And the key 6-year
cycle bias in 2009 will be up instead of down.
Technical traders will have confirmation that the bear market's back
has been broken once the VIX breaks the 60-day moving average uptrend (see
chart below). We should also see improved trading conditions entering
2009, with fewer whipsaws and sudden reversals that have characterized the
past few months since the volatility explosion.

The past year was a challenging one fraught with peril in the face of frozen
credit and cyclical cross-currents. Yet for every crisis there is a corresponding
opportunity. This year's crisis has brought equity values to opportunity
levels as we enter what promises to be a kinder market environment, thanks
in part to the Kress cycle configuration going forward. The fact that
the Fed has finally (if belatedly) reversed its tight money stance is also
a key factor in the months ahead.
Clif Droke is the editor of the three times weekly Momentum Strategies Report
newsletter, published since 1997, which covers U.S. equity markets and various
stock sectors, natural resources, money supply and bank credit trends, the
dollar and the U.S. economy. The forecasts are made using a unique proprietary
blend of analytical methods involving internal momentum and moving average
systems, as well as securities lending trends. He is also the author
of numerous books, including "Stock Trading with Moving Averages." For
more information visit www.clifdroke.com.
|