|
As published on www.canadianmoneysaver.ca October 2008
The US financial crisis has now spread across the globe. Years of easy credit
created massive asset bubbles in the housing and financial services sectors.
As bond fund manager Bill Gross points out, there was "too much exuberant leverage,
not enough regulation; too strong a belief in asset-based prosperity, too little
common sense that prices could go down as well as up; excessive "me first" greed,
too little concern for the burden of future generations."
Many
advisors still recommend holding for the long term and suggest that investors "ride
out the storm." This may eventually work for very young investors but may prove
to be a poor strategy for everyone else. Bull and bear markets tend to move
in cycles lasting for about 20 years. The Dows 1929 peak was not surpassed
until 1953 (24 years later), the Dows 1968 peak was not surpassed until 1982
(14 years later) and the Japanese NIKKEI is down 80% from its peak of 44,000
in 1989. As of this writing, the Dow is at the same level that it was at the
beginning of 1999 and the storm has only just begun. When inflation is taken
into account, the length of time to break even becomes significantly longer.
The current crisis is about to send inflation soaring, wreaking havoc on even
the most conservative investors portfolio.
As defaults and foreclosures intensify and house prices continue to decline,
the recession will get worse and the credit crisis will be amplified by the
$1.2 quadrillion of derivatives that have been created. This will require increasingly
larger government rescue and bailout attempts. Whats worse, this influx of
money is certain to have unintended consequences that are both long-term and
very damaging. Although trillions of dollars in bailouts have already been
issued, they will take time to work through the system, and lawmakers and economists
admit there is no guarantee that they will work. Currently, we are in the midst
of a liquidity crisis brought on by the bursting of two asset bubbles. But
the real danger is that the liquidity issue could become a full-blown insolvency
crisis if credit is not made available in time to re-liquefy the system.
Figure 1: Bailout Costs
Over the past few months the US Fed and most other central banks have been
increasing money supply by ever-higher amounts in order to fund the various
bailouts. TARP, the most recent US bailout at the time this article was written,
will cost taxpayers $850 billion. When all of this years bailouts are taken
into account, they already total $1.45 trillion (see Figure 1) and some
pundits are estimating that the total may eventually reach $5 trillion. In
addition, on October 13 Europe created a $2.3 trillion bailout package to protect
the continent's banks.
As a result of this crisis, the Fed, as well as other central banks, are about
to enter a new phase in the easing of monetary policy that has already taken
real interest rates below zero when the real inflation rate is taken into account
Most economists agree that inflation arises when the central banks increase
the money supply in excess of the rate of GDP growth. For many years, the worlds
central banks have been doing just that. The fact is, global expansion in money
supply has been depreciating all currencies, not just US dollars. The
law of supply and demand is inescapable. If too many dollars chase too few
goods, those goods must rise in price. Inflation always decreases real wealth
by eroding purchasing power. In the US, the Fed and Treasury are already pumping
out vast amounts of public money to "liquefy" the banking system, and US money
growth is now running at close to 14%, well above the official GDP rate of
3-4%. This year alone the total money supply, as measured by M3, has already
increased by over $1 trillion. This doesnt include the announced bailouts.
Another $1.6 trillion was potentially added to the governments exposure when
the Fed recently announced they would begin buying secured and unsecured commercial
paper (short-term loans for business). This is a historic first; it did not
occur even in the midst of the Great Depression.
"Accelerating government deficits approaching a trillion
dollars [will trigger] the eventual rise of inflation."
- Bill Gross, October 2008
Then there is the interest expense the government must pay on all that borrowed
money. Estimates are approximately $64 billion per year, but that is rising.
Where is the money going to come from? Not from higher taxes, as consumers
have already been hurt by rapidly declining home and stock prices. The US government
will have to issue more treasuries and bonds and, if they are not to sold to
investors, then the Fed will simply monetize the debt by "printing" more money.
Apart from the current bailouts, the US also has to print money on an accelerating
basis for its unfunded Social Security and Medicare obligations, which at present
are about $60 trillion. Numbers of this size are hard to relate to, but it
works out to about $200,000 for every man, woman and child in the US.
After a big run-up, commodity prices have pulled back as recession fears begin
to spread. While no one can call the bottom or knows if we are heading for
a mild or a deep recession, the consensus is for a global slowdown with rising
unemployment. Longer term, inflationary pressures will start to rise as the
newly printed money works its way into the system. In addition, due to the
decline in global oil production coupled with rising demand from China, India,
Russia and Brazil, oil prices will resume their surge. As oil is used in the
manufacturing of most products as well as agriculture, mining and transportation,
rising oil prices will lead to increases in most commodities and finished products.
Meanwhile, all the money that was printed and borrowed to try and liquefy
the system will escalate prices, leading to an inflationary recession. The
worst of all possible worlds is declining purchasing power combined with high
unemployment and rising prices. This is 1970s-style stagflation, but because
inflation numbers have been understated for years, and money supply is set
to increase at unprecedented rates, this time it could intensify into a hyperinflationary
depression.
Since 1971, central banks have had the ability to create money without any
limits, and they are using it to their advantage. Apart from the US M3 money
supply, which is growing at about 16%, India is at 20%, China is at 16%, Russia
is at 31% and Brazil is at 32%.
The US Fed and government will do whatever it takes to bail out the banking
system and avoid a deflationary depression. A 1970s-style inflation is preferable
to a 1930s-style deflation. However, due to the extreme levels of debt, derivatives
and other exotic financial instruments this strategy could lead to a hyperinflationary
depression like the one currently being experienced in Zimbabwe. Yet the US,
and for that matter any government, has a strong incentive to expand money
supply as a stealth tax to inflate its way out of its debt problems.
Official US inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is currently
running at about 5% (3% in Canada). But is this real inflation? The calculations
governments now use for CPI are really meaningless as a true inflation indicator.
Since 1980, the methodology used to calculate the CPI has changed. Using the
original formula of a fixed basket of goods and services, economist John Williams
has recreated the CPI as you can see in Figure 2. The SGS Alternate
CPI uses the original
Figure 2: Annual Consumer Inflation - CPI vs. SGS Alternate

1980 formula and results in a CPI of 13%. When a countrys money supply is
increased, its currency is debased. As the currencys purchasing power declines,
prices appear to be rising. And with global money supply growing at double
digit rates, rising prices and real inflation is likely to be closer to 14%
rather than the official 5%.
"Inflation is a far more devastating tax than anything
that has been enacted by our legislature."
- Warren Buffett
Taking into account real inflation together with increasing money supply,
many fixed income investors and retirees will come to realize that instead
of being "safe" investments, they are in fact guaranteed losses of
purchasing power. At a bond yield of 4% and inflation of 13%, investors are
losing 9% in purchasing power before taxes. At the same time, the principal
is declining at 13%. Over a 10-year period, $100,000 becomes only $28,555 even
if there is no default.
In times of crisis and extraordinary financial stress, astute investors take
refuge in precious metals. Their unique characteristics mean they are neither
anyones liability (bonds) nor someones promise of performance (stocks). As
central banks worldwide continue to accelerate the pace at which money is printed,
inflation will increase while bonds, stocks and confidence in printed currencies
will decline. Precious metals have been a proven store of value for over 3,000
years.
In todays environment, portfolios need to be structured to counteract the
effects of inflation. With bond yields being below the real inflation rate,
it becomes difficult for investors requiring current cash flow to find suitable
investments. An alternative to fixed income investments is placing a portion
of assets into investments that appreciate at a higher rate than prevailing
inflation. By liquidating some capital gains, investors will be able to maintain
their income and preserve capital instead of experiencing a loss of both purchasing
power and principal in fixed income investments. Over the long term, precious
metals have generally outperformed inflation. A calculator comparing fixed
income investments to liquidating a portion of the capital gains is available
at www.bmginc.ca/bondsvsbullion.
Investors can simply insert their own assumptions and see the results after
tax and after inflation.
Inflation is coming. In an environment of soaring inflation, precious metals
are poised to soar alongside.
|