|
Hank Paulson's valedictory interview was another depressing reminder of how
deeply rooted many economic fallacies are. The fault for the financial crisis
does not lie with domestic monetary policy or Greenspan's incompetence but
with those lousy Chinese who insist on saving instead of whooping it up on
over-extended credit cards. Next in line are the exploiting oil exporters and
their financial shenanigans. The combined effect of the reprehensible behaviour
of these scoundrels was to flood the world with super-abundant savings which
lowered interest rates and triggered an unsustainable boom. According to the
ever-so clever Mr Paulson
Excesses ... built up for a long time, [with]
investors looking for yield, mis-pricing risk," he said. "It could take different
forms. For some of the European banks it was eastern Europe. Spain and the
UK were much more like the US with housing being the biggest bubble. With
Japan it may be banks continuing to invest in equities.
This argument has been around for years and was endorsed by Bernanke. Early
last year Mr Glenn Stevens, governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, lent
it support in a paper titled Recent Financial Developments. In his profound
opinion
[a]n excess of saving over investment in Asia was a feature, resulting partly
from the reaction to the late 1990s crisis and the determination to avoid
a repeat of it.
The excess-savings thesis has the enormous virtue of absolving central bankers
from any responsibility for the financial crisis by insinuating that it was
caused by market failure that the appropriate regulatory framework can eventually
deal with. All that is needed to establish international financial stability
is for central banks to develop macroeconomic co-operation among themselves.
Naturally, there must also be greater domestic regulation of financial institutions
and money markets
What a self-serving crock! The fallacy of excess savings was demolished by
the classical economists. Jeremy Bentham advanced the idea but abandoned it
after James Stuart Mill had explained to him its impossibility. (The fallacy
was later resurrected in 1829 by Wakefield in his Letter from Sydney and
then accepted in a very diluted form by John Stuart Mill). What these financial
mavens call "excess savings" is just plain old inflation.
Let us assume that some lucky devil with $1,000,000 to spare deposits it in
a bank which then lends it out according to the banking system's reserve requirements
with the result that the original deposit is pyramided into $10,000,000 of
deposits. Can it no be argued that the banking system now has excess savings
to the tune of $9,000.000? Of course it can. It would also be fallacious to
do so. What we really have here is credit expansion -- and it is credit expansion
that fuelled the world-wide boom that brought us the global financial crisis.
Now for a few financial facts that I cobbled together, the sort of things
that central bankers are supposed to be experts on. From 1994 in China demand
deposits plus foreign currency deposits expanded by about 100 per cent. US
money supply defined as currency plus all checking demand deposits and savings
deposits rose from 1996 to 2008 by about 120 per cent*. It was even worse for
Australia. From March 1996 to October 2008 currency rose by 129 per cent, bank
deposits 201 per cent and M1 by 185 per cent. It was the same story in the
rest of the world.
And it was this global monetary expansion that created the imbalances that
gave Paulson heartburn. Yet none of this is new. The same 'experts' who gave
us the current financial mess are the same ones who warn us about the necessity
of maintaining a stable prices level. But one of the great lessons of the nineteenth
century is that falling prices due to increased productivity do not squeeze
profits even though they raise real wages. Price stabilisation schemes are
in fact inflationary policies. It has been argued that after rapid inflation
caused by the gold discoveries of 1848 and 1851 the steady gold supply stimulated
output and stabilised prices for some 20-odd years. However, Cairnes pointed
out that
the action of the new gold on prices will not be uniform, but partial. Certain
classes of commodities will be affected much more powerfully than others.
Prices generally will rise, but with unequal steps ... The movement will
be governed throughout its course by economic laws. (John E. Cairnes, Essays
in Political Economy, Mcmillan and Co., 1873, p. 57)
In other words, monetary expansion -- not genuine savings -- create imbalances.
But what are real savings? They are the process of transforming present goods
(money) into future goods (capital goods). The only kind of savings that credit
expansion can create are "forced savings". (See, for example, Jeremy Bentham,
Thomas Malthus, Henry Thornton, Knut Wicksell, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich
von Hayek).
Every single member of the Austrian school of economics saw the crisis coming,
even if they couldn't put a date and a time on its arrival. Nevertheless their
warnings were completely ignored. (Kaletsky even had the bloody nerve to pretend
that no one predicted the crisis. [How we all got it wrong this year, The
Australian, 30 December 2008]. In his narrow little mind the Austrians
only exist as "fundamentalists").
*These are only rought estimates. Nevertheless, it is indisputable
that there has been a reckless monetary expansion.
|