|
This is an excerpt from an RSG Newsletter dated January 17, 2009.
Friday, the last trading day with the Bush Administration in command, was
marked by new lows in the terribly ill banking sector. The Troubled Assets
Relief Program (TARP) became law on October 3, 2008. Since then, the Philadelphia
Bank Index ($BKX) has declined by an astonishing 55%.

In fact, the financial sector as a whole is now trading near its 1995 levels
when the problems from the 1980s banking crisis were still being digested.

The primary reasons for this fiasco are: continuous rule changes and lack
of any policy follow-through, absence of any transparency of how the funds
are being spent and finally an understanding by investors that even $700 billion
will be insufficient to patch the gigantic and growing hole in the banks' balance
sheets.
With the 2009 S&P 500 earnings per share expected to decline to $40, even
an 800 level in the index produces a P/E of 20, a fair value at best. Of course,
the key is how fast the earnings will recover in 2010 or 2011. Right now the
market is clearly saying that it does not like the Paulson approach to stopping
the bursting of the financial bubble and that the earnings recovery is still
far away.
We agree with those experts' predictions which state that the financial system
needs about $1.5 trillion more to patch up this deflating bubble. But every
week, it seems that there are new problems. For 2008, bank losses related to
credit cards were $28 billion. In 2009, as more people lose their jobs and
run out of savings, the number is expected to grow to $100 billion.
A bigger problem yet is the coming mortgage rate reset for hundreds of thousands
of homeowners. While the Subprime tidal wave is largely over, the majority
Alt-A and the Option Adjustables resets are still to come in 2009 through 2011.
And the effect on the economy can be just as large if not larger and more painful
than the subprime crisis.
With enormous job losses experienced over the past few months, homeowners
are now in a much worse shape to be able to absorb an increase in mortgage
interest rates. Many of these same homeowners cannot take advantage of today's
low mortgage rates since the value of their homes is now less than their mortgage.
Seemingly, it is a trap with no way out. If the government does not intervene
directly, the only answer for many is foreclosure.
With so much change promised, what does President Obama have in store for
us?
The $825B spending package unveiled by the House last week was a disappointment
to us. It offers little in tax cuts, but a lot in social giveaways to states.
The much promised infrastructure spending on highways, transit and energy is
just $148 billion.
Instead, most of the spending is for immediate social needs such as unemployment
benefits, insurance and health care. While this money will be spent quickly,
we doubt there is much of a sustainable stimulative effect to the US economy
(perhaps it will help the Chinese economy?!).
We doubt that the plan will create 3-4 million jobs, 90% of which are supposed
to come from the private sector. If such a promise is to be fulfilled, much
more money will be needed for direct infrastructure, technology, transportation,
industry investments or in form of tax cuts or investment credits for businesses.

In addition to this proposed emergency spending, the second $350 billion installment
of the TARP has been released to the new president. As Bernanke first suggested
a few months ago, the money is most likely to be spent in setting up a $1 Trillion
Bad Asset Bank (AGGREGATED). This appears to be a measure of desperation since
the financial sector recapitalization efforts to date have failed to work.
Similar to the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), this government bank would
swap good assets (such as cash and treasuries) for toxic assets that appear
on the banks' balance sheets. Banks get cash; taxpayers get toxic assets with
questionable value.
So far, that is the recap of the change that is coming with the new Administration.
By improving the balance sheets in the financial sector, they hope that confidence
in the financial system will recover and that bank recapitalization will succeed.
Is this going to work? We believe eventually it will, although it will take
a lot more than $350 billion and much more time than most people hope for.

The reaction of the broad market to the Obama Administration "innovations" remains
muted. Yet gold
and other precious metals stocks began to demonstrate remarkable outperformance
compared the rest of equities at a moment when it became clear that Obama won.
This is convincing evidence that inflationary policies of the new Administration
are, as expected, bullish for gold.
|