|
Below is an excerpt from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
22nd January 2009.
One of our themes over the years has been that monetary factors are driving
the major trends in the financial markets. To put it another way, we have tended
to downplay the effects on market prices of non-monetary drivers such as the
expansion of the internet, the industrialisation of China, and "Peak Oil".
For example, in the 8th August 2007 Interim Update we wrote:
"As explained in the past, when it comes to the "commodity supercycle" we
are definitely sceptics. We concur with the view that commodity prices
in general and metal prices in particular are in long-term upward trends,
but we do not think these trends are being driven by the strong growth
of "Chindia" or the global spread of capitalism or the industrialisation
of Asia or the movement of billions of people to the ranks of the "middle
class" or any of the other catchphrases routinely used to neatly explain
the price action. In our opinion, these explanations rank alongside slogans
such as "new economy" and "technology-driven productivity miracle" that
were used to legitimise the price action of tech stocks during the boom
of the late-1990s.
As we see it, inflation (money supply growth) is causing a rolling boom/bust
cycle whereby the combination of relative valuation and scarcity determines
which sectors will be the major beneficiaries of inflation during the current
cycle and which sectors will be relegated to the investment 'scrap heap'.
The analysts who concoct simple explanations based on real (non-monetary)
changes in the world and repeat these explanations in mantra-like fashion
will look incredibly prescient for a long time, even though they largely
ignore the monetary factors that are actually at the root of the price
changes."
The dominance of monetary factors has an implication that we have intimated
in the past, but have not blatantly stated: gold is not only in a long-term
bull market, it is the ONLY long-term bull market.
By way of further explanation, for something to be in a long-term bull market
it must be in a long-term upward trend in REAL terms; that is, its purchasing
power must be increasing. On the other hand, if an investment's long-term upward
trend in nominal price terms does not translate into a long-term upward trend
in real terms then the price rise is due to depreciation of the currency rather
than appreciation of the investment.
Now, determining whether a nominal gain translates into a real gain is often
not a straightforward matter due to the impossibility of measuring the economy-wide
change in a currency's purchasing power. In fact, there is no ideal way of
measuring the real performance of any investment; at least, none that we know
of. We have found, however, that an investment's long-term performance in gold
terms is a reasonable proxy for its real long-term performance. We therefore
consider that for something to be in a long-term bull market it must be in
a long-term upward trend relative to gold.
This prompts the question: which of the major markets are presently in long-term
upward trends relative to gold? The answer is: none of them. Over the past
decade there were multi-year periods during which various markets trended higher
in gold terms, but the relative gains achieved by these markets rapidly evaporated
last year.
To put it another way, a good case can be made that gold is the only long-term
bull market 'on the go' at this time. Moreover, based on the information presently
at hand we suspect that this will remain the case over the coming decade or
until there's an upside blow-off in the gold price.
We aren't offering a free trial subscription at this time, but
free samples of our work (excerpts from our regular commentaries) can be viewed
at: http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/freesamples.html.
|