|
Philipp Bagus and Markus H. Schiml,
Ludwig von Mises Institute
Only two things can save the Fed at this point. One is a bailout by the federal
government. This recapitalization could be financed by taxes or by monetizing
government debt in another blow to the value of the currency.
The other possibility is concealed in the hidden reserves of the Fed's gold
position, which is only valued at $42.44 per troy ounce on the balance sheet.
A revaluation of the gold reserves would boost the equity ratio of the Fed
to 12.35%.
It is ironic that in troubled times a revaluation of the "barbarous relic" could
save the Fed from insolvency. Yet this would only be an accounting measure
and would not change the fundamental problems of the paper dollar. While shooting
its last bullets and weakening the dollar, the Fed is outmaneuvering itself.
The end of the experiment is getting closer.
Doug
Casey, Casey Research
America, which is basically an idea, a concept, is dead and gone. The United
States is just another of 200 awful little nation-states that have spread across
the face of the earth like a skin disease. There's no longer any difference
that I can tell between the U.S. and any other country.
There is no real haven for freedom in the world today. The best you can do
is go where the governments are so unorganized that they can't control you
effectively. That's one reason I like to spend time in Argentina. They have
an incredibly stupid government, but they're also very inefficient and ineffective.
So it's wonderful as a place to live. I also spend time in Uruguay, because
it's a tiny little country with no ambitions to conquer the world. The nice
thing about New Zealand, where I am now, is that it's a small country, only
4 million people, lots of open land. It's got some severe problems, but it's
pleasant. I think the U.S. is going to be the epicenter of a lot of problems
in the years to come.
...Europe is going to be hurt much worse than the U.S. Europeans are much
more heavily taxed and much more heavily regulated. The average European is
much more reliant upon the state psychologically as well as economically. So
it's all over for Europe and this doesn't even count the problems that they're
going to have in the continuing war against Islam, which are much more serious
for Europe than they are for the U.S. So Europe is fated to be nothing but
a source of houseboys and maids for the Chinese in the next generation.
Gary
Gibson, Whisky & Gunpowder
For the first time in history, currencies everywhere are merely paper...including
the world's reserve currency. The potential...the inevitability...of a worldwide
bonfire of these little paper vanities staggers the imagination. The conflagration
will be mesmerizing in its size and intensity. You may even find yourself enjoying
the view...if you make it a point to be standing far enough away not to be
consumed.
Peter
Hambro, Peter Hambro Gold
People can see that the only solution to the credit crisis is to devalue all
fiat currencies. The job of central bankers is to allow this to happen in an
orderly fashion through inflation. I'm afraid it is the only way to avoid disaster,
but naturally investors are turning to gold as a form of wealth insurance.
Eric Janszen,
iTulip
There you have it, the foolproof way to get frightened investors out of Treasury
bonds and back into stocks if all else fails: central banks around the world
print money and buy stocks. In a world where interventionism is the order of
the day, government purchases of stocks for the purpose of supporting the stock
market is only, in my view, a matter of time. The question is, how to best
prepare for it. For all we know, it's already started. And, because [Paulson,
Bernanke, et al] are not really gods -- they can't foresee the consequences
of all they do -- there will be myriad unintended consequences. One we're pretty
sure of, the gold price will continue to climb.
...We
are getting a 1930 to 1933 financial system and debt deflation collapse
but in Internet time. The Internet that operated so efficiently for ultra
efficient transmission of pricing information and execution of transactions
is accelerating the financial and economic crisis process far more quickly
than governments can respond to it. A 20th century international regulatory
and trade institutional framework is no match for 21st century computer networked
financial markets. No administration can correct 30 years of errors in a
few months. Unfortunately, a few months is all we have because of the accelerated
rate of change we are experiencing.
History teaches us that adjustments to imbalances can be sudden and brutal,
and we think it imprudent to bet that the mother of all international payments
imbalances -- between the US and the rest of the world -- will be the exception.
The rise of gold from $260 to $700 in six years followed by an increase from
$700 to $1000 in two years may be quickly followed by a rise from $1,000 to
$5,000 in just a few months.
Michael Maloney,
GoldSilver
One last thing, anyone predicting a gold price of less than 5 digits, clearly
does not understand the fundamentals of gold or the current economic situation.
Over the long haul, I think $10,000 is the minimum target, but it is far more
likely that the dollar price of gold will become infinite. That is what happens
in a hyperinflation.
Trace
Mayer, Seeking Alpha
What if silver trades in backwardation for an extended period? It means individuals
are unwilling to take the risk of holding national currency illusions or the
risk of an exchange's failure to deliver. Potentially the national currency
illusions could be pulled into the event horizon leading to the fiat currency
graveyard. Watching the gold and silver prices in euros and pounds is getting
exciting.
David
Morgan, Silver Investor
The easy money has been made in the precious metals but the BIG money
lies ahead, because if you think like I think, once this "disinflation" turns
into a dollar collapse people will be looking for anything that will hold value,
and that certainly includes both the precious metals. Remember there is no
fever like gold fever, and that will ignite the silver market, as those looking
to gold might be priced out of the market and, thus, willing to buy silver!
Doug
Noland, Prudent Bear
Analysts made a momentous blunder earlier this decade when they mistook the
collapse of the technology Bubble (and attendant recession and corporate debt
problems) for the onset of "deflation." Reflationary policymaking without regard
to the nature of inflationary consequences proved disastrous. We're about to
repeat this error. The Burgeoning Bubble in Government Finance is poised to
make the Mortgage Finance Bubble appear tiny in comparison.
The Government Finance Bubble is enormous and powerful - and should be anything
but underestimated. Akin to the previous Bubble in Wall Street finance, the
epicenter of this Bubble is here in the U.S. But I would argue that this unfolding
Bubble dynamic has greater potential to engulf the entire world than even U.S.-style
mortgages and derivatives did starting back around 2002. Welcome to the new
world of synchronized stimulus, deficits, and reflationary policymaking. I
don't believe true systemic deflation (as opposed to collapsing asset Bubbles)
is a high probability scenario as long as the Government Finance Bubble is
rapidly inflating. All bets are off, however, if confidence in government debt
falters.
Gary North, LewRockwell.com
The West's economy really is at the edge of a leveraged disaster. The politicians
know only one answer: deficit spending. The central bankers have only one
significant tool: monetary inflation. The speed of events is increasing.
The markets don't reflect this yet. This gives time to a few people to get
out. But the vast majority cannot get out. There are too few escape hatches
open.
Steve Saville,
Speculative Investor
The famous economist J. M. Keynes didn't understand the link between the boom/bust
cycle, fractional reserve banking and the central bank's manipulation of interest
rates. He therefore relied on mysterious changes in something he called "animal
spirits" to explain how booms would evolve into busts. Many of today's economists
operate from within a similar faulty framework, and thus believe a key to turning
the economy around is boosting the confidence of consumers and businesses.
They don't seem to appreciate that the problems are REAL, as opposed to figments
of our collective imagination. A loss of confidence, leading to less spending
on current consumption and a consequential increase in saving, is a RATIONAL
response to the current economic REALITY. By putting a hallucinogen in the
water supply you could probably make people feel more confident and thus cause
them to go out and spend freely for a while, but how could this possibly help
given that the current predicament involves too much debt, too little savings,
and a mismatch between production and consumption? Obviously it wouldn't help;
it would just make a bad situation even worse.
...1959 was the year when a critical mass of people came to realise that a
knock-on effect of the changing nature of money would be unrestrained growth
in the money supply, making bonds inherently riskier than stocks over the long
haul. Such 'sea changes' naturally happen very rarely, but they do happen.
2008 could have marked another such change -- one that could prove to be far
more dramatic and to have far wider implications than 1959's crossover in bond
and stock yields. We are referring to the potential for 2008 to go down in
history as the year when the secular expansion of private-sector credit came
to an end.
For decade after decade after decade, the total amount of private-sector debt
increased with only brief interruptions. This multi-generational upward trend
was supported by central banks, especially by central bank policies that attempted
to cut-short every pullback in the economy-wide level of indebtedness and keep
commercial banks in operation regardless of how over-extended their balance
sheets became. The trend eventually/inevitably culminated in a multi-year credit
binge, which, in turn, led to the current situation in which the total amount
of private-sector debt is potentially so high relative to real economic output
that no amount of monetary manipulation will bring about the resumption of
the former trend.
The above paragraph is consistent with the writings of prominent deflation
forecasters, but where we have always differed from the deflationists is in
our belief that faced with a 'tapped out' private sector the government would
become the sole engine of credit creation and monetary inflation. In particular,
we have always thought that a reduction in the amount of money borrowed into
existence by the private sector would prove to be a fairly minor obstacle to
the long-term inflation trend because when 'push came to shove' the government
would make full use of its unlimited borrowing power. The amount by which a
private entity is willing or able to go into debt is limited by its ability
to repay the debt, but there is no limit to the amount of debt a government
can take-on provided that the debt is denominated in a currency that can be
created out of nothing by its central bank. Witness how rapidly the US government
has been able to expand its indebtedness over the past few months and the complete
lack of concern about how the debt will ever be repaid.
If we are correct that a secular change has occurred in the realm of credit
creation then it makes no sense to compare the current situation to the recessions
that occurred during the 1970s, the 1980s, the 1990s, or even 2001-2002. Also,
it opens up the possibility that the Dow/Gold ratio will not stop falling after
it reaches one.
Peter Schiff,
Euro Pacific Capital
Although it may sound harsh, it would be far better for all involved if our
foreign friends simply cut us off. Since their loans are merely fueling the
growth of our government and artificially pumping up consumer spending, their
savings will not only be lost but their sacrifice will severely exacerbate
our problems as well.
Darryll
Schoon
The day people realize that paper money is worthless is the day economic activity
as we know it will come to a halt. What happens next has happened before. Barter
begins the movement of goods and services until a trustworthy medium of exchange
arises to take the place of the bankers' debased paper.
Currency collapse is a reoccurring story. Because we denied its reality does
not mean it would not happen. Denial is very powerful but, in the end, it changes
nothing except the ability to effectively respond. Our wish that gold achieve
its rightful price level in today's accelerating crisis is tempered by our
realization that when that day is reached, the human carnage and suffering
will be without precedence. It is best, then, to buy gold and silver whenever
possible and to wait patiently for things to unfold as they will.
Mike
Shedlock, Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
The idea of a deflationary trap is in and of itself complete nonsense. Deflation
is actually a natural state of affairs. As productivity increases, standard
of living rises and prices fall. Absent government intervention, productivity
would actually increase the amount of goods produced, causing prices to drop.
Falling prices are a good thing not a bad one.
Fed and government policies rob taxpayers by promoting policies of inflation.
Look at what accompanies rising prices: rising property taxes, rising sales
taxes, and rising income taxes. Is that a good thing? The answer is no, especially
when wages fail to keep up, which is exactly what happened.
Who benefits from inflation? The answer is government, banks, and already
wealthy because they are first in line to receive money. Everyone else is screwed.
Inflation is theft from the middle and lower classes for the benefit of government
and the wealthy.
Eric Sprott,
Sprott Asset Management
So here we are today with governments the world over taking an increasing role
in the functioning of the economy and the financial markets. But are they trying
to solve the main problem; namely, too much debt? Quite the contrary, every
single solution they've adopted has been trying to get the good ol' days back.
Cutting interest rates to zero. Throwing money at the banking system so it
can lend again. All these solutions have one goal: to bring back debt. They
are ignoring, at least for the time being, the paradigm shift. But the markets
aren't buying it... literally. Debts continue to implode.
Every bailout is being followed by an even more massive bailout down the road.
The government's solution has been to shift debt from the financial markets
to the taxpayer. Is there a difference? Instead of individuals living beyond
their means, we now have governments living beyond their means. Substitute
taxpayers for governments and you will quickly realize how the whole thing
is a farce.
Take no solace in the fact that the government is the buyer of last resort.
It is really you who are the buyer of last resort. In the end, people will
be even more indebted than they were before, setting the stage for the next
crisis: a currency crisis. This is why governments aren't, and cannot be, the
solution.
James West,
Midas Letter
The true reflection of the value of any currency, the only one that's really
left, is how much gold it can buy.
|