|
This past Tuesday, the flagship S&P 500 stock index (SPX) surged 6.4%
in its biggest daily rally since rocketing out of its panic low in late November.
Gold, which was flat that morning, suffered increasing selling pressure as
the day marched on. As the SPX strengthened, gold weakened in an inverse linear
fashion. It ultimately fell 2.6% that day, sliding under $900 for the first
time in a month.
Seeing gold down considerably on a big SPX up day reinforced an increasingly
popular trading thesis on this metal. It argues that since gold is a safe-haven
trade, the primary reason it was bid higher in recent months was because of
the relentless stock-market weakness. Therefore, as the stock markets recover
gold will be sold off aggressively as capital emerges out of hiding and begins
flowing into stocks again.
This notion seems to be the primary bearish argument advanced against gold
these days. And with the SPX looking increasingly like it has finally
bottomed, hence a monster
rally is imminent, this gold-opposing-stock-markets worldview is more urgent
than ever. There is no doubt that the radically oversold stock markets are
indeed due for an epic rally, and if gold is sold off in proportion then its
traders are looking at a world of hurt.
Given gold's centuries-old role as a classic safe haven for capital in times
of extreme financial stress, this bearish outlook on gold feels quite
logical. And market days like Tuesday definitely reinforce this premise from
time to time. But as all traders know, emotions are our mortal enemies in the
financial markets. Just because something feels logical doesn't necessarily
mean it will come to pass as expected.
Having been betrayed by my own emotions many times in my evolution as a speculator,
I'd much rather let the markets tell me what to expect from any particular
relationship between two assets. We all have an innate bias to seriously overweight
our most recent market experiences to the exclusion of past history. A day
like Tuesday looms large in our consciousness, crowding out a balanced view
over a longer timeframe.
So this week I decided to study gold's relationship with the SPX over much
longer periods. While there have certainly been days where the gold-opposing-stock-markets
thesis has performed perfectly, does this relationship really hold on balance?
Is gold really likely to plummet in the shadow of the gigantic and long-overdue
SPX rally? This prospect is certainly generating a lot of gold anxiety today.
Perspective is everything, it helps us overcome our tendency to overweight
recent experience which distorts our worldview. So rather than just looking
at gold versus the SPX over days, I want to see it over months and years. The
longer the period of time over which any price relationship persists the more
important it is, the more likely it is fundamentally-driven, and the more likely
it will continue into the future.
We'll start with years in this first chart, which encompasses the longview
since 2003. As you know, between March 2003 and October 2007 the SPX powered
95.5% higher in a mighty cyclical bull market within
a secular bear. With so much stock strength, if there was ever a time when
demand for safe-haven assets faded this period had to be it. So was gold beaten
to a pulp as the stock markets reached for the heavens, like traders expect
today?

Not so you'd notice! To the very days of this long and strong 55-month SPX
cyclical bull, gold powered 110.4% higher which exceeded the stock markets'
gains. Gold, marching to the beat of its own inherently bullish fundamentals,
moved higher in a parallel bull market. Powerful multi-year bulls in
the stock markets and gold are clearly not mutually exclusive. Gold can and
does thrive even when stocks are strong as long as its own independent fundamentals
remain bullish.
There is certainly some interplay between the fortunes of the stock markets
and capital flowing into gold. Gold's appeal as an alternative asset is definitely
higher when traditional investments are not faring well. But realize that the
relationship between gold and the SPX is far more nuanced and complex than
merely a direct inverse or even parallel relationship. The SPX is not, and
never has been, gold's primary driver.
I looked at gold versus the SPX over a variety of major spans which are noted
above. Gold was not only up more than the SPX during stocks' long bull, but
it far outperformed the SPX during the nasty bear we've suffered. Between October
2007 and this past Monday, a horrific span where the SPX lost 56.8% of its
value, gold actually rallied 24.8% to the very days. Gold tends to thrive during
stock bears in history.
But this is a general relationship that is most apparent over long spans.
If you carve the data into shorter spans, every possible relationship between
gold and the SPX can be observed. For example, from gold's all-time nominal
high in March 2008 to its panic low in November 2008, this metal fell 29.3%.
Over this same slice of time the SPX bled 33.2%. Periods like these when gold
travels parallel with the SPX cause problems for the gold-opposing-stock-markets
thesis.
In the most recent major period for gold, from its November lows until late
February, the metal powered 39.6% higher. Over this period of time the SPX
fell 12.8%. This particular period buttresses the gold-opposing-stock-markets
argument and is the major reason why this thesis is growing in popularity today.
But just like during gold's parallel bull market with the SPX from early 2003
to late 2007, gold's behavior relative to the SPX since its extreme volatility
erupted last summer is also nuanced and complex.
This next chart zooms into the extraordinary once-in-a-lifetime period of
market chaos we have experienced since June 2008. Just as the years-long behavior
of gold shows no reason for gold bulls to fear a strong SPX, so does this months-long
view. While it is easy to cherry-pick individual datapoints to support whatever
view of gold and the SPX you want to advance, on balance there is no
ongoing direct relationship.

This lack of direct relationship between the SPX and gold is very apparent
on multiple scales since June. This chart notes the performances of gold and
the SPX over various key technical spans for gold. The gray numbers are the
correlation r-squares over these spans. While r-squares aren't positive or
negative, I put a sign on them to show whether the underlying correlations
used to compute them were positive or negative. As you walk through gold's
recent history relative to the SPX, it is clear stocks don't govern gold.
In June and early July, gold surged while the SPX ground to new bear-to-date
lows. But in August gold plunged while the SPX was essentially flat. Over this
span gold fell 23.8% while the SPX merely gained 2.8%. Clearly SPX strength
wasn't driving this particular gold selloff. And the daily correlation r-square
proves it. At 1% driven by a slight negative correlation, there was literally
no statistical relationship at all between gold and the SPX.
Then from mid-September to early October gold soared 23.2%. Over this very
span the SPX plunged 27.2%. This appears like it supports the gold-opposing-stock-markets
thesis visually, but mathematically it isn't nearly as compelling. There was
indeed a negative daily correlation, but it resulted in a trivial r-square
of just 21%. In other words, only 21% of gold's daily price action could be
directly explained mathematically by the daily price action in the SPX.
After peaking again in early October, gold plunged 22.4% into mid-November.
Provocatively, this happened in parallel with a sizable 6.3% SPX selloff. There
was a slight positive correlation, but the r-square of 14% shows no meaningful
relationship. After this selloff, gold started surging again and blasted 23.9%
higher by late December. Yet the SPX rose in parallel, up 6.0%. Still, they
had a weak positive correlation resulting in a sub-18% r-square.
Then in early January both gold and the SPX plunged in unison, down 8.0% and
6.7% respectively with a very high 89% r-square based on a positive correlation.
Over the only brief span in recent months where gold was actually highly statistically
correlated with the SPX they moved in tandem. The more you dig into
the actual data, and refuse to be swayed by isolated anomalous days, the more
absurd the gold-opposing-stock-markets thesis looks.
These three spans considered together, from early October to mid-January encompassing
the height of the
stock panic, are very problematic for those who believe a big SPX rally
is going to hammer gold. During incredibly intense SPX weakness gold fell right
along with stocks. And as this extraordinary stock panic neared its
lows and started recovering, gold rallied sharply with stocks. Then
when new-year stock selling emerged, gold fell too. There was no gold opposition
to the SPX here, but quite the opposite!
During the most intense stock-market months seen in our lifetimes, gold paralleled the
SPX's direction. This is provocative because the coming SPX rally ought to
be extreme too given the incredible degree of oversoldness it has weathered.
You can certainly build the case based on gold's recent performance that it
is far more likely to follow an extreme SPX rally higher than wither
and die as many traders expect.
From its January low, gold surged another 22.5% by late February while the
SPX fell 11.8% over this same span of time. It is this particular 5-week period
that really sparked today's popularity of the gold-opposing-stock-markets thesis.
I do believe the demoralizing continuing SPX selling over this span increased
investment demand for gold considerably. But still, gold and the SPX only had
an r-square based on a negative correlation of 45% here. As a speculator, I
find anything under 70% isn't worth worrying about.
And finally, from gold's latest $1000 attempt in late February until this
week, it is down 9.6%. Yet somewhat amusingly, the SPX fell too over this same
span, off 3.2%. Yet again gold and the SPX had a mild positive correlation,
exactly the opposite of what those who expect an SPX rally to crush gold are
aggressively predicting. Are you starting to get the picture here?
It is not that gold is positively or negatively correlated with the stock
markets, but that gold is simply not correlated with the stock markets
lately! Sometimes gold and the SPX happen to both be rising, other times they
both happen to be falling, and still other times they diverge for a spell.
For any two prices, there are only four possible outcomes. A and B both rise,
A and B both fall, A rises and B falls, and A falls and B rises. Thus in even
a totally random market environment with no true relationship, around a
quarter to a half of the time any thesis on a relationship whether it exists
on balance or not will look justified. So to actually trade successfully on
a perceived relationship, you need to make darned sure it exists far more often
than it doesn't. Gold opposing the stock markets fails this basic test.
All four possible outcomes are apparent in this data even on extreme days.
On September 17th, gold soared 11.1% in its biggest daily rally since January
1980. And that day the SPX happened to plunge 4.7%. When I experienced that
day unfolding in real-time, I absolutely thought the intense stock weakness
was driving new investment demand for gold. We saw a big-up gold day on a big-down
SPX day, just what the gold-opposing-stock-markets thesis expects.
Then a month later on October 16th, gold fell 4.9% when the SPX surged 4.3%.
I remember that day well too, as the CNBC talking heads claimed gold was falling
because stocks were strong so demand for a safe haven was waning. This big-down
gold day on a big-up SPX day, along with the previous opposite example in late
September, certainly buttressed the gold-opposing-stock-markets thesis.
But just a week later on October 22nd, gold plunged 5.5% on the same day the
SPX plunged 6.1%. On that day it felt like all assets were being liquidated
out of extreme fear. A big-down gold day happened on a big-down SPX day. Then
on November 21st, the day after the SPX's panic lows, the SPX surged 6.3% higher
yet gold rocketed 7.4% higher in tandem. It felt like a great relief that the
stock markets weren't going to fall off a cliff as many feared, and gold benefitted
from risk capital returning to the markets.
The point of this is that if someone wants to show you wild days where gold
moved in opposition to the SPX, you can just as easily find wild days where
gold moved with the SPX. During the extreme volatility of the stock-panic
fear-bubble days, we saw big-up SPX with big-down gold, big-down SPX with big-up
gold, big-down SPX and gold, as well as big-up SPX and gold. All four possibilities
were well-covered.
Despite how logical the anti-safe-haven argument may sound, history simply
does not support the notion that gold is doomed in a strong SPX rally. Gold
has its own innate supply-and-demand fundamentals that
are largely independent of stock-market action. Sure, there are certainly times
where gold is influenced by capital flows into and out of stocks. But there
are many more other times when it is totally oblivious to them too.
While it is easy to refute a direct inverse relationship between gold and
the SPX, a strong indirect one did indeed arise during the stock panic
that lingers to today. I discussed it in depth in an
essay way back in October and this knowledge has helped our subscribers
make very profitable gold, silver, and precious-metals-stocks trades since
then. It involves the SPX's impact on the US dollar.
During the stock panic, investors dumped everything (including gold at times)
to exit the chaos and raise cash fast. They moved this cash into short-term
US Treasuries, which seemed like the safest place for capital at the time.
But foreign investors, after selling stocks in their local markets, had to
first buy US dollars before they could park in US Treasuries. This drove an unprecedented
dollar rally. As futures traders saw the dollar skyrocket, they sold gold
aggressively. It was really something to behold.
The inverse correlation between the SPX and the US Dollar Index (USDX) was
stellar, especially on particularly fear-laden days of intense SPX selling.
The USDX hit new rally highs on the very days the SPX fell to new lows
in October and November and then again in the last couple weeks. Falling to
new bear lows in the SPX always drove dollar buying, and the resulting incredible
USDX strength often hit gold. So in an indirect way via the dollar, the stock
panic did indeed affect the gold price.
Provocatively though, this indirect relationship actually means that a major
SPX rally will be very bullish for gold, not bearish. As the inevitable
SPX recovery rally accelerates, this USDX trend will reverse. Capital hiding
in Treasuries will exit to hunt for the widespread bargains in the stock markets.
Foreign investors will sell their Treasuries and then sell their dollars to
repurchase their local currencies to buy stocks on their local exchanges. Thus
the US dollar should fall fast in an accelerating SPX rally.
And a falling dollar means futures traders will get really interested in gold
and bid it up rapidly. So due to the dollar's unique role in this crazy stock
episode, there is actually a very high probability that the SPX's recovery
will indirectly lead to a big surge in gold. This relationship is only
apparent through careful study though. If you let your emotions take a recent
day or two of gold opposing the stock markets out of context, you'll totally
miss it.
Gold's strength during a major SPX rally could be multiplied even farther
by amazing record demand for the GLD
gold ETF. If you don't understand what GLD is doing today, you aren't going
to understand where gold is going. This ETF's record buying is so important
I devoted the current issue of our acclaimed monthly
newsletter to its activities. Subscribe
today to learn why GLD's unprecedented large-scale impact is making gold's
(and the gold stocks') outlook more bullish today than ever before. Opportunities
are vast!
The bottom line is there is no historical basis at all for the increasingly
popular thesis that the inevitable giant SPX rebound rally is going to crush
gold. While you can indeed find isolated incidents of gold moving in opposition
to the SPX, this behavior occurs no more often than randomness would suggest.
On balance since 2003, gold has actually moved with the stock markets
far more often than against them.
It is true that extreme stock-market action can indirectly affect capital
flows into gold from time to time. But gold has its own intrinsic and bullish
fundamentals that are totally independent of the SPX's fortunes. Gold needs
neither an SPX bull nor bear to thrive. This metal will continue powering higher
on balance until lagging mined supply finally catches up with global demand,
which won't be for many years yet.
|