|
Way back in late 2000, only the very hardest-core contrarians even considered
investing in gold stocks. This sector was all but obliterated after a multi-decade
bear in gold. Its flagship HUI gold-stock index was languishing in the 40s,
while the headline S&P 500 still traded in the 1400s. Most investors didn't
even know the tiny gold-mining sector even existed.
Those few willing to deploy capital into such a wasteland needed to have very
good reasons for making such seemingly hopeless bets. One of the arguments
we used to buy gold stocks back then was as a counterpoint to the newly-born
secular stock bear. Since general stocks were likely doomed to poor performance
for over a decade to come due to their excessive
valuations, why not buy gold stocks?
Time has clearly vindicated us early contrarians in this decision. From its
2000 close to its worst levels a few weeks ago, the S&P 500 fell 48.8%.
Meanwhile over this exact same span, which is actually quite unfavorable for
the HUI, it still soared 573.2%! Emerging from utter despair, gold stocks have
indeed become one of the best-performing sectors of this entire decade.
While excessive general-stock valuations certainly weren't the only, or even
the primary, reason to buy gold stocks when no one else wanted to, this thesis
still generated a lot of controversy in the early 2000s. Astute investors rightfully
pointed out that the valuations on the gold stocks were often higher than
those of the tech-stock bubble we were betting against. Was a gold stock trading
at 150x earnings a better investment than a tech stock "merely" trading at
75x?
Many called us hypocrites, as we were railing about the imploding tech-stock
bubble (an unsustainable valuation anomaly) yet simultaneously buying gold
stocks with little or no earnings of their own. But we weren't ignoring the
ludicrous gold-stock valuations, we were anticipating their future earnings
potential. As the expected secular gold bull gradually gained steam,
we expected gold-mining earnings to grow at a faster pace than gold-stock prices
climbed. This would gradually collapse their high P/E ratios.
Since I was not only deploying my own capital in the battered-down gold stocks,
but advancing this gold-stock-valuation-contraction thesis publicly, I started
a thread of research on gold-stock valuations. I needed to understand if this
was indeed happening as expected. As gold-stock prices marched higher since
the early 2000s, was their earnings growth indeed outpacing their stock-price
gains? Were their early outrageous valuations indeed contracting?
Initially in this research, we used the world's largest gold miner (Newmont
Mining at the time) as a proxy for this sector as a whole. Newmont, then and
now, was the only primary gold miner included in the S&P 500. We were doing
a ton of general-stock-market valuation
work so we had monthly valuation data on every S&P 500 component including
Newmont. Here is a chart of this data from the
4th essay of this series.

Newmont Mining, the world's premier gold miner over most of this span, was
indeed following the model. It traded as high as 160x earnings in late
2000 when it could barely eke out any profits in the brutal $260s gold environment.
And then it was unprofitable for the next year and a half, so it had no P/E.
But when it started producing profitably again in mid-2002, its P/E had been
cut in half to 80x. And since then, NEM's valuation has continued to gradually
contract on balance.
While I don't want to spend too much time on this old chart today, the key
point is Newmont's market capitalization soared 1067% at best while its P/E
ratio simultaneously fell 85%. You need to have breathtaking earnings
growth to support a greater-than 5/6ths plunge in a company's valuation at
the same time its market cap multiplies by an order of magnitude. The thesis
was unfolding as I had expected!
While this research proved that gold-stock earnings growth was far-outpacing
stock-price appreciation, so valuations were becoming more reasonable, I was
never quite comfortable with it. It is never optimal to use one stock as a
proxy for an entire sector. There are too many company-specific developments
that affect its earnings and stock price that don't affect its peers', which
dilutes its representative usefulness.
In Newmont's case, it issued great quantities of new stock to expand. Barrick
Gold usurped its place as the world's largest gold miner. NEM has also faced
serious operational challenges over the last couple years, hurting profits.
While I am still satisfied with my long-term investment in Newmont I made in
March 2002, it has fallen out of favor among gold-stock investors in recent
years. I have no doubt this perception will reverse, they usually do, but it
still highlights the danger of using any single company as a sector proxy.
So back in late 2006, at Zeal we started collecting valuation data for the
entire HUI. The HUI is not only the world's flagship gold-stock index, but
its 15 component companies vary greatly by size, operations, locations of mines,
and a myriad of other factors. Thus the HUI is a superior and diversified representation
of this sector, unlike any single company. Last month my business partner Scott
Wright wrote a fantastic essay briefly surveying each of the HUI's component
companies. Read it if you'd like to better understand this index's impressive
fundamental breadth.
Unfortunately building a new dataset takes time. For an obscure sector like
gold stocks, most of this data can only be secured in real-time the day it
happens. After that it is lost forever. Data companies only tend to save data
there is considerable demand for, so to the best of my knowledge you can't
even buy historical HUI valuation data. No one cares even now, despite this
being one of this decade's best-performing sectors. Which suggests this gold-stock
stealth bull has a long way higher to run yet!
Like our famous general-stock-market valuation data (charted on our website
for subscribers), we have been compiling the HUI valuation data at the end
of every month. We look at the P/E ratios and dividend yields of each individual
HUI component in order to compute these key valuation metrics for this index
as a whole. We do both simple averages of these metrics as well as market-capitalization-weighted
averages.
I have long thought this MCWA approach is superior for valuation work. Imagine
an index of 2 stocks. One trades at a P/E ratio of 100x while the other is
sporting a 10x multiple. Their simple average is 55x earnings. But if one company
is way bigger than the other, this number is skewed. If the 10x company is
worth $20b, but the 100x company only has a $1b market cap, then the larger
company should have proportionally more influence than the smaller one. After
all, investors have much more capital at stake in it!
So by weighting valuation metrics by the market capitalizations of individual
index components, I believe we get a much sounder view of gold-stock valuations
over the long term. And since the HUI is such a small index, just 15 stocks
compared to the S&P 500's 500 stocks, this MCWA approach also helps reduce
the overall valuation impact of the sometimes wildly-fluctuating earnings results
of the smaller gold miners.
After more than 2 years of painstakingly collecting HUI valuation data each
month, here is the first chart of it. I've been excited to see this for a long
time. As we continue to add to this dataset going forward, it will allow for
superior gold-stock-valuation analysis. And you really could not ask for a
wilder period of time in HUI terms to analyze from a valuation perspective.
This sector has been crazy-volatile.

After hitting an all-time high in March 2008, a staggering 1331% run from
the HUI's bear low of November 2000, this index was ultimately driven to plunge
70.6% by October 2008 in the stock panic. Since those dismal lows, its initial
recovery has already surged 120.5% higher by this week. While gold stock valuations
are gradually contracting, this is still an extremely volatile sector not for
the faint of heart.
But despite this short span of time, and the once-in-a-lifetime stock
panic that drove such wild anomalies, there are still some interesting HUI
valuation observations. For example, in the first two quarters of 2007 the
HUI averaged 335 on close and its MCWA P/E (all P/Es I use from now on will
be MCWA, although both it and simple are shown in this chart) averaged 25.3x
earnings. 25x is really quite reasonable.
Mainstream stock investors usually have no problem paying 20x to 30x earnings
for stocks with outstanding potential for profits growth. And the gold stocks
certainly have this due to the secular
gold bull and their impressive profits
leverage inherent with higher gold prices. To see the elite gold stocks
of the HUI trading in the mid-20s in P/E ratio terms is incredible, it totally
vindicates those of us who bought at far higher valuations yet far lower stock
prices in the early 2000s.
In Q3 2007, the HUI started powering higher in another upleg. Valuations initially
shot up with stock prices, as earnings are always slower to change than stock
prices and they are only reported quarterly for any given stock. But gradually
the higher gold prices translated into higher earnings as expected, dropping
gold-stock valuations. By the end of Q1 2008 the HUI was near the 450s compared
to the 400s at the end of Q3 2007. Yet its valuations remained at similar levels,
gold stocks were growing earnings.
During the first half of 2008 (before the bond and stock panics started),
the HUI averaged 443 on close. It generally consolidated sideways over this
span while the general stock markets ground lower in a strengthening
bear. Yet despite gold-stock prices remaining high, the HUI valuation shrunk
considerably. Trading at 46.6x earnings in January, by July the HUI's P/E had
contracted to 30.7x. This is a microcosm episode of the secular trend of outsized
earnings growth evident in Newmont in the first chart.
Of course the stock panic (and the preceding bond panic which indirectly
hit gold and hence gold stocks) in the second half of last year cast
all the financial markets into unbelievable disarray. The gold-stock investors,
once so brave, panicked too. By late October thanks to the HUI's plunge,
it was trading at an incredible 15.7x earnings! To give you an idea of how
cheap this is, the S&P 500 was trading at 13.9x right then. Gold stocks
were almost as cheap in pure valuation terms as the general stock markets!
Such events almost never happen in high-potential speculative sectors, so
the bargains in gold stocks were obviously immense. In late October we started
aggressively buying gold stocks and silver stocks and recommended our subscription
newsletter subscribers do the same. We not only added short-term trades,
but our first long-term investments in gold stocks in years. As of this week,
our new long-term investments in this sector are up an average of 91.6% since
late October.
Since then, the HUI has recovered back up to early-2007 levels and the latest
valuation read we computed at the end of February is running at 25.7x earnings.
While this is reasonable, I don't expect this situation to persist. Odds are
high that HUI valuations will fall considerably soon after Q1 earnings are
reported. This will make gold stocks even more attractive to investors than
they are today.
Back in Q1 2007 when the HUI last traded consistently at today's levels, gold
averaged $649 on close. But so far in Q1 2009 it is averaging $909, 40.0% higher!
So gold miners are going to have much higher revenue this quarter, and thus
far higher profits, than they did back in early 2007. Further magnifying this
effect, the average oil price this quarter is running 26.6% cheaper than it
did back then. Thus many of gold miners' big energy costs of mining will be
lower this quarter, resulting in even higher operating profits.
So unlike most other sectors in the stock markets that are looking at slow
earnings in this first post-panic quarter, gold miners are likely to announce
excellent profits. This should garner a lot of attention and increase investor
interest in this high-potential sector. And since gold's own future looks so
dazzlingly bullish for many
fundamental reasons, this trend should only accelerate. I fully expect
the next update on this thread of research to show HUI profits growing nicely
on balance.
In addition, many of the world's biggest and best gold miners have been gradually
transitioning from old to new mines over the last few years. This drove much
higher costs (hence lower profits) for miners on a couple fronts. First, as
old mines are depleted their costs are spread over fewer ounces of gold. Second,
as new mines are brought online, their initial production gradually ramps up
which results in costs spread over fewer ounces as well. So when the old mines
are fully retired and the new ones fully up to speed, this industry's profits
should increase markedly.
Conventional valuation analysis like this is critically important for all
long-term stock investors to study. After all, it was looking at market P/E
ratios that warned contrarians way back in
2000 and 2001 that a devastating secular stock bear had been born.
And with the stock markets likely to trade sideways for
17 years after 2000, alternative investments like
commodities were the place to be. Valuation analysis has made fortunes
for us and our subscribers, and I will always keep studying it.
But as I've pondered the specific case of gold-stock valuations in recent
years, I'm gradually becoming convinced an unconventional approach is more
useful than the classic P/E ratio approach. Rather than looking at earnings
themselves, why not look at the one thing that drives gold-stock earnings?
The price of gold, of course! Thus the HUI/Gold Ratio, the HUI index level
divided by the gold price, has proven much more useful for gold-stock trading
decisions than P/E ratio analysis.

It was this HGR
chart, not the low P/E ratios, that led me to aggressively buy and recommend
gold stocks in late October when most traders and analysts were running for
the exits in terror. In the 5 years prior to the stock panic, the HGR had
traded in a tight secular range between 0.46x and 0.56x. Note above that
each time after the HGR neared or pierced support of 0.46x, tradable HUI
rallies soon emerged. Some of these were very large and massively profitable.
Traders buying gold stocks whenever the HGR neared its support, and tightening
stops when it neared resistance, were rewarded with outstandingly profitable
gold-stock investments and speculations. And there is a real fundamental basis
for this relationship since gold-stock prices are ultimately driven by mining
profits, which in turn are ultimately driven by the price of gold. Gold stocks'
innate ability to leverage a gold bull is the very reason people invest in
them in the first place.
The HGR's 5-year pre-panic average was 0.511x, meaning the HUI averaged just
over half the price of gold. To think of this in valuation terms, this
0.5x number is essentially "fair value". When the HUI was trading well over
it gold stocks were getting ahead of themselves, temporarily overbought. But
when the HUI fell well under it, they were lagging gold and not yet reflecting
their true earnings potential.
And then 2008's epic stock panic arrived, shattering this secular trading
range like it did so many other longstanding relationships. Both gold and the
HUI fell in the heart of the panic as the fear bubble climaxed, but the HUI
plunged faster and farther than gold. This meant gold outperformed the HUI,
which of course drove the HGR lower. You can see the resulting deep anomaly
on this chart, as the HGR was driven to unthinkably low levels in the depths
of the panic.
It was this absurd HGR that led me to buy gold stocks in late October. The
HUI was trading at the same place it was when gold was in the $350s, yet gold's worst close
of the entire panic was over twice as high. Even if gold had never recovered,
it made no sense at all for gold stocks to be discounting $350 gold when the
metal itself was in the low $700s. The HGR proved a much more powerful valuation
proxy than classical valuation analysis!
So while I am excited to see how the true HUI P/E ratio valuations play out
in the coming years, I think that looking at the HUI's levels relative to its
primary driver gold also has great "valuation" merit. Odds are the HUI will
gradually return to its historical relationship with gold, which means gold-stock
prices are far too cheap even today. Eventually they will reflect today's
gold price, since it drives their profits.
At Zeal we'll continue our decade-long quest to really understand gold stocks,
and what drives them, at a deep level. Knowledge is power, and as always in
the financial markets the biggest profits over the long term will accrue to
those who are the most diligent in seeking understanding. Yet you can share
in the valuable fruits of our research for an infinitesimal fraction of the
costs we bear. Subscribe today to
our acclaimed monthly newsletter!
We also just finished a deep 3-month study of the universe of junior gold
stocks. These small explorers are the riskiest stocks of the gold realm, many
will totally fail but a few will achieve dazzling success and earn fortunes
for their owners. We painstakingly whittled down the multitudes of junior golds
to our 12 favorites, those we believe have the best prospects for success for
fundamental reasons. And we just published a comprehensive new 25-page report profiling
each of these elite companies. Buy
it today!
The bottom line is gold-stock valuations are indeed gradually contracting
on balance, just as we contrarians expected back in the early 2000s. The secular
gold bull is driving such large profits increases for the gold-mining sector
that valuations have plunged despite radically higher gold-stock prices. As
gold powers higher, this trend should continue. Gold stocks' future earnings
potential in a gold bull is vast.
In addition gold stocks are not only reasonable today in P/E terms, but very
cheap relative to prevailing gold prices. Sooner or later this residual stock-panic
discount will totally vanish. Ultimately over the long term, all stock prices
gravitate to their underlying companies' earnings. And since the gold price
controls the gold miners' future profits, their stocks will continue to follow
and leverage gold as always.
|