|
For those less familiar with technical analysis, markets often pause or
reverse at their 200-day moving average, which can act as strong resistance.

Fundamentals - Stress Tests May Understate Where Unemployment Is Headed: Before
we get into the technicals, on the fundamental side, the bank stress tests
are obviously big for the markets. Since the government feels this is a "crisis
of confidence", you can bet the announcements will err on the side of building
confidence. If they tell us everything is "ok", does that really mean everything
is "ok"? The baseline stress scenario and the more extreme scenario are not
all that stressful - they most likely underestimate where employment and defaults
are headed. The baseline scenario is quite optimistic with unemployment forecasted
to peak at 8.7% - we are at 8.5% now (www.bls.gov).
The more adverse and "stressful" scenario has unemployment peaking at 10.4%
in Q4 of 2010, which is more realistic, but may not capture where unemployment
peaks as we continue to move away from a leveraged world - with capacity to
produce goods for a highly leveraged world. From a recent NYT
article:
Regulators say all 19 banks undergoing the exams will pass them. Indeed,
they say this is a test that a bank simply will not fail: if the examiners
determine that a bank needs "exceptional assistance," the government, that
is, taxpayers, will provide it.
From Clusterstock:
At this point, the big stress test at 19 of the nation's largest banks
seems like something of a joke. . . .
From the always bubbly and sentimental Nouriel
Roubini:
But if you look at the actual data today macro data for Q1 on the three
variables used in the stress tests - growth rate, unemployment rate, and
home price depreciation - are already worse than those in FDIC baseline
scenario for 2009 AND even worse than those for the more adverse stressed
scenario for 2009. Thus, the stress test results are meaningless as actual
data are already running worse than the worst case scenario.
Some other comments on the stress tests can be found in the NYT
blog (4/9/2009).
Technicals - Weekly Charts: Charts help us better understand who's
winning the battle between the bulls and bears, which is another way of saying
it helps us monitor the basic relationship between supply and demand. Supply
and demand (or conviction) determine price. In the final analysis, after all
the noise, we care about price. Weekly charts (and monthly) help us take a
step back from shorter-term volatility and better understand the strength of
markets. For example, if a market pulls back, the daily chart will show weakness
in numerous indicators (as we would expect). During the pullback, if the weekly
chart remains healthy, then the correction may be just that - a correction
(or healthy countertrend move). If the weekly chart also deteriorates on a
pullback, then it may signal more than just a normal and healthy correction.
Therefore, as markets rise or fall, the weekly and monthly charts can help
us better understand the odds of higher highs (in an uptrend) or lower lows
(in a downtrend). We always refer to odds and probabilities - not certainties
or forecasts.
In technical analysis, indicators should confirm moves in prices. For example
when prices make a new high, we would like to see numerous technical indicators
make a new high as well. We see some positive confirmations of price via some
of the indicators in the weekly chart of the base metals ETF (DBB).

All charts as of April 14, 2009 close. Green arrows in the charts point
out positive signals - orange arrows point to areas of some concern, and red
arrows highlight areas of possible weakness, which could indicate a weakening
trend.


Daily Charts - Shorter-Term Health: Will the stress test results give
the market the needed push to break through resistance or will they be a disappointment
which keeps resistance and trend channels intact? We will have to monitor the
situation with an open mind.

Retail stocks have been a leader in the current rally. How they perform going
forward could be a proxy for all risk assets. From a fundamental perspective,
you have to pause when considering bets on an over-leveraged consumer, who
may be uncertain about their job security.


When prices make a new high, but an indicator fails to make a new high, we
have what is known as a negative divergence. A negative divergence can be an
early signal that the bulls are losing some of their grip on the bears. A single
negative divergence in a single technical indicator is not all that disconcerting.
However, the negative divergences become more significant when we see them
in numerous indicators, across several markets, and in multiple time frames
(daily, weekly, monthly). Below we present some negative divergences that may
point to further corrections in risk assets. Since many of these divergences
are shown on daily charts, they tell us to be cautious in the short-term. They
do not necessarily send signals that these markets cannot advance after a correction
has run its course.



The lack of clarity in the charts of DBC and the CRB Index (commodities) does
not give a strong vote of confidence to the theory of a V-shaped recovery.
It is possible they are just lagging behind, but their indifference should
be taken into account.


Some of the markets above represent the leaders of the current rally. Their
path at points of potential resistance can be used to monitor the sustainability
of the recent rally in all risk assets. If these markets can breakout in a
convincing manner, we would be much more open to putting cash to work. Conversely,
if we get unhealthy pullbacks at or near current levels, it may signal the
move off the March 2009 lows was just another in a series of powerful bear
market rallies. If we pay attention, these markets will give us some good information
in the coming days, weeks, and months.
The charts and commentary above are for illustrative and educational
purposes only and are not recommendations to buy or sell any security.
|