|
Recently, stock markets appear to have experienced an almost euphoric phase,
seemingly shrugging off most negative news flow day after day. Whether or not
you believe in the so-called "green shoots" of economic recovery, a significant
economic rebound, or a continued decline in economic activity, one thing seems
abundantly clear: investors have been becoming less risk averse. The most commonly
followed "fear indicator", the VIX index, has retracted (likewise, other commonly
followed indicators such as the TED
spread has tightened and OIS
spreads have reverted to levels not seen since the Lehman Brothers collapse),
three month T-bill yields have recently risen and equity markets around the
world have rebounded from March lows.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves just yet though. We consider the impetus
for the recent stock market rally has been news flow and data pointing to economic
stabilization in the U.S., not an economic rebound. Negative news flow
and data still seems to predominate, though it appears to be dissipating. As
such, we may well be nearing an economic trough, as the rate of decline of
economic growth (also referred to as the second derivative of economic growth),
appears to be slowing. That said, positive news flow continues to be conspicuous
in its absence. Hence, we would caution against misinterpreting current data
as a precursor to a looming economic recovery. Indeed, significant economic
overhang and headwinds remain, while an economic stabilization, in and of itself,
does not portend an imminent economic reboun.
Merk
Insights provide the Merk Perspective on currencies, global imbalances,
the trade deficit, the socio-economic impact of the U.S. administration's
policies and more.
Don't miss an Insight:
Sign up for our Newsletter
The Archive:
Read past Merk
Insights
In our opinion, it is unlikely that economic growth will exhibit a "hockey
stick" rebound because so many issues must still be worked through, many of
which may curtail economic growth for an extended period of time. For instance,
numerous mortgage holders who bought homes around the peak of the housing bubble
are yet to refinance their loans, the unemployment rate continues to climb,
and de-leveraging is likely to continue at both the corporate and personal
levels. All of which will constrain consumer spending, the main driving force
behind economic growth. Moreover, the ambiguousness of the present administration's
intentions and policies creates a heightened level of investment uncertainty,
while the inflationary implications of present Federal Reserve interventions
is increasingly worrying (please see our previous newsletter entitled (Un)Intended
Consequences: Uncertainty, Inflation & Inflexibility).
Nonetheless, we may be entering a phase of lower market volatility and a reversal
of risk aversion trades. With the onset of the financial crisis, many investors
pulled their money out of investment positions in international markets and
into the U.S. dollar in a perceived "flight to safety". We consider this phenomenon
transient in nature - most of these funds did not flow to "sticky" long-term
asset classes (in light of the capitulation in U.S. stock markets, it certainly
doesn't appear much ended up in equities). Just witness the yield squeeze exhibited
by short-term U.S. T-bills during the crisis. Thus much of this money may be
set for imminent redeployment. We believe a reversal of these positions bodes
well for many international currencies.
In our opinion, investor risk appetite will remain at an elevated level relative
to those seen at the height of the crisis, in part due to a misinterpretation
of current data as "green shoots" of economic recovery (a more apt analogy
might be of spring sun counteracting the growing size of an out of control
snowball racing towards a village), but also due to the generally held view
that the worst is behind us. Indeed, the market recently shrugged off the very
real prospect of a global pandemic in the swine flu. While we continue to see
challenges ahead, we nevertheless consider present dynamics augur well for
many currencies outside of the U.S. dollar. In light of present expectations,
we consider investors are increasingly likely to redeploy funds internationally,
reversing their "flight to safety" trades. We believe certain countries may
be better placed than others, particularly China, which can actually afford
its stimulus, and whose growth outlook, in our opinion, appears more favorable.
Much of Asia may benefit too, while those countries that benefit from a rise
in commodity prices, such as Australia, Norway, New Zealand, and to a lesser
extent Canada (we consider its close proximity and inter-dependence with the
U.S. economy as a drawback) are also likely to benefit from increased investment
flows.
Additionally, we consider gold will be a net beneficiary of current policies
and market interventions. As previously noted, we believe present initiatives
are creating significant latent inflationary pressures. This inflationary overhang
appears to have already spooked the market: the spread between long-term TIPS and
equivalent maturity Treasury bonds has widened, and the price of gold has appreciated.
We consider that the evolution and transpiration of economic ramifications,
brought about by present initiatives, will act as a catalyst in underpinning
the strength in the price of gold going forward.
The flip side of all this begs the question - if investors increasingly move
towards riskier assets, and away from government issues, who will be left (or,
more to the point, willing) to purchase the government bonds required to fund
the administration's unprecedented level of spending? Especially given the
low yields on these securities, a factor compounded by the Fed's intervention
in the market. Indeed, the Fed may have to ramp up purchases of these securities
if others abstain, monetizing government debt, and driving the price of these
assets further from "fair" market value, compounding inflationary pressures
in the process.
In light of these dynamics, investors may want to consider whether a basket
of hard or Asian currencies would be a beneficial addition to their portfolios.
We manage the Merk Hard and Asian Currency Funds, no-load mutual funds seeking
to protect against a decline in the dollar by investing in baskets of hard
and Asian currencies, respectively. To learn more about the Funds, or to subscribe
to our free newsletter, please visit www.merkfund.com.
|
Kieran Osborne
Merk Mutual Funds
Kieran
Osborne is Senior Analyst and member of the portfolio management group at Merk
Investments; he is an expert on macro trends and currencies and has significant
international market experience. Prior to Merk Investments, Mr. Osborne was
an equity analyst at Brook Asset Management, where he worked in both the Australian
and New Zealand markets. He has also worked in New York for MCM Associates,
a U.S. hedge fund.
The Merk Asian Currency Fund invests in a basket of Asian
currencies. Asian currencies the Fund may invest in include, but are not limited
to, the currencies of China, Hong Kong, Japan, India, Indonesia, Malaysia,
the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand.
The Merk Hard Currency Fund invests in a basket of hard
currencies. Hard currencies are currencies backed by sound monetary policy;
sound monetary policy focuses on price stability.
The Funds may be appropriate for you if you are pursuing
a long-term goal with a hard or Asian currency component to your portfolio;
are willing to tolerate the risks associated with investments in foreign currencies;
or are looking for a way to potentially mitigate downside risk in or profit
from a secular bear market. For more information on the Funds and to download
a prospectus, please visit www.merkfund.com.
Investors should consider the investment objectives,
risks and charges and expenses of the Merk Funds carefully before investing.
This and other information is in the prospectus, a copy of which may be obtained
by visiting the Funds' website at www.merkfund.com or calling 866-MERK FUND.
Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.
The Funds primarily invest in foreign currencies and
as such, changes in currency exchange rates will affect the value of what
the Funds own and the price of the Funds' shares. Investing in foreign instruments
bears a greater risk than investing in domestic instruments for reasons such
as volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic
focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets.
The Funds are subject to interest rate risk which is the risk that debt securities
in the Funds' portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market
interest rates. The Funds may also invest in derivative securities which
can be volatile and involve various types and degrees of risk. As a non-diversified
fund, the Merk Hard Currency Fund will be subject to more investment risk
and potential for volatility than a diversified fund because its portfolio
may, at times, focus on a limited number of issuers. For a more complete
discussion of these and other Fund risks please refer to the Funds' prospectuses.
The views in this article were those of Kieran Osborne
as of the newsletter's publication date and may not reflect his views at any
time thereafter. These views and opinions should not be construed as investment
advice. Mr. Osborne is Senior Analyst and part of the portfolio management
group at Merk Investments LLC. Merk Investments LLC manages the Merk Hard and
Asian Currency Funds. Foreside Fund Services, LLC, distributor.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|