|
Below is an excerpt from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on
7th June 2009.
It is clear that a concerted effort is being made to replace the ruptured
private-sector debt bubble with a government debt bubble, although the effort
is generally not labeled as such. Moreover, the dramatic increase in government
debt that we are seeing is really just a symptom of expanding government. In
the case of the US, for example, GW Bush presided over a rapid expansion of
government power and the trend has accelerated under Obama.
As an aside, although President Obama is sometimes referred to as the new
FDR he is probably more like President Herbert Hoover than President FD Roosevelt.
We say this because Hoover -- despite the way he is often portrayed -- was
a strong believer in the ideology of central planning, whereas Roosevelt didn't
believe in anything except the need for him and his party to maintain political
power. Both Hoover and Roosevelt were totally clueless about economics, but
whereas FDR never expended any mental energy contemplating the long-term economic
implications of any policy -- his sole consideration being a policy's vote-winning
potential -- Hoover genuinely believed that a government-managed economy would
be more efficient than a free-market economy if only the government applied
the practices that worked well in the field of project engineering.
Getting back on topic, we can explain why the current trend will lead to
poor economic performance and the severe curtailment of individual freedom,
and, therefore, why it should be stopped. However, when planning our investments
and our lives we must acknowledge the reality that the government's growth
spurt will almost certainly not end anytime soon, because there is very little
resistance to it. That is, we must act based on the way things are, as opposed
to the way they should be, and part of today's reality is an inexorable trend
towards a bigger and more intrusive government.
Something to bear in mind when considering the investment implications of
the current trend is that governments always play favourites. To be more specific,
the governments of today are giant re-distribution machines in that they take
money and resources from some individuals, corporations and economic sectors,
and give them to other individuals, corporations and economic sectors. The
overall economy either grows at a reduced pace or shrinks as a result of this
re-distribution, and in the long run almost everyone loses; but over shorter
timeframes there will be winners as well as losers. The winners will be chosen
by those in power based on perceived vote-gaining potential (the Roosevelt
approach) or the misguided belief that the economy can be improved via the
government-mandated transfer of resources from A to B (the Hoover approach),
although we expect that the biggest winner of all will not be chosen by the
government, but will, instead, arise due to the unintended consequences of
the wealth re-distribution. We expect gold to be the biggest winner.
Other big winners are likely to be companies involved in alternative energy
and companies that benefit from increased spending on infrastructure, but in
general the stocks of non-gold companies will have substantial downside risk
until after the broad stock market becomes attractively valued.
We aren't offering a free trial subscription at this time, but free
samples of our work (excerpts from our regular commentaries) can be viewed
at: http://www.speculative-investor.com/new/freesamples.html.
|