|
The title of this post is actually a quote from Mr. JP Morgan in the early
1900s during a Congressional hearing in the United States. Big league bankstas
know the role of Gold in the system. Gold is the asset base upon which paper
schemes and leverage are constructed. Gold is not a way to get rich, but it
is savings and it is money.
When paper schemes and scams collapse, he/she who holds the Gold gets to start
and/or participate in the new scheme because he/she has the money! Speculating
in currencies is fine if it is one's interest, but Gold speculation is simply
that. There are many other inflation hedges besides Gold. But to preserve wealth
in US Dollars or any other paper fiat currency is risky over the longer term.
Most people want to multiply their wealth, not preserve it. But for those
who understand the nature of the current economic crisis and the nature of
the typical cyclical government responses (yes, there are even more still ahead)
to combat these unstoppable economic forces, owning at least a little physical
Gold makes sense. If the return on the stock market, real estate and commodities
is negative over the next year and the government is about to get desperate
to once again debase the currency by any means necessary, where is a safe place
to store your money?
This is why the inflation versus deflation debate is so spirited and so important
to those trying to preserve and/or grow their wealth. Gold is a hedge. It is
a fair (not great) inflation hedge and a good deflation hedge and it provides
catastrophe insurance as well. I would never advise anyone to put all their
money in Gold but I also think it's foolish at this point in the economic cycle
(i.e. a Kondratieff Winter or secular credit contraction) not to have at least
5% of one's liquid net worth in physical Gold held outside the system.
This is not doom and gloom, this is being smart and being prepared. If you
end up not needing the insurance, you'll probably make an almost risk free
profit on the price of Gold and you will avoid the inevitable further losses
coming to other asset classes. Yes, most deflationists prefer fiat cash over
Gold, but not me. This is because I also think a coordinated regional or global
response to this crisis could knock the US Dollar down a peg and might dethrone
it. If I am wrong, I will have missed a few percent of yield. If I am right
I will have avoided losing 30-70% of my savings to chase a few percent of yield.
I don't claim to know exactly what's going to happen to the US Dollar over
the next decade but I do know that the Dow
to Gold ratio will reach 2 at a minimum. I am trading the bear market to
make money and patiently waiting to put all of my speculative capital into
Gold stocks from the long side once I think the bear market is almost over.
But Gold is my hedge and my boring savings account in case I'm not as good
a speculator as I'd like to think I've become. I also cannot time bureaucratic
decree as I am not privy to any insider information, so how can I know exactly
when a big apparatchik-decreed currency event is coming when it will almost
certainly be announced out of the blue on a random day known only to insiders?
To end, I'll leave you with a quote I disagree with but the first two sentences
of it are what many central bankstas and governments in effect tell their people
(all the while holding more Gold than anyone):
"Gold is not necessary. I have no interest in [G]old. We will build a
solid state, without an ounce of [G]old behind it. Anyone who sells above
the set prices, let him be marched off to a concentration camp. That's
the bastion of money." - Adolf Hitler
|