|
The good news is:
• Seasonally next week has been one of the strongest of the year.
Short Term
I will start with a happy chart.
The chart below covers the past 100 trading days showing the S&P 500 (SPX)
in red and a 10% trend (19 day EMA) of NYSE new highs (NY NH) in green. Dashed
vertical lines have been drawn on the 1st trading day of each month. The indicator
hit a multi month high on Thursday suggesting prices are heading higher.
Unfortunately there is a problem with NYSE data. Over the years the number
of fixed income issues on the NYSE has been increasing. Without outside influence
(such as changing interest rates) fixed income issues accumulate value daily
until they pay their dividend (monthly or quarterly) when they decline in value
by the amount of the dividend. Over the past 29 years that I have been watching
the NYSE breadth indicators I have seen them go from having a slightly negatively
bias to a wildly positive bias.

The next chart is similar to the one above except is shows the NASADAQ composite
(OTC) in blue and the indicator (OTC NH) calculated from NASDAQ new highs in
green.
OTC NH is unremarkable.

The next chart is pretty ugly, it shows the Russell 2000 (!RUT - R2K) in red
and an indicator showing new lows calculated from the component issues of the
R2K (NL) over the past 15 trading days in blue. NL has been plotted on an inverted
Y axis so decreasing new lows move the indicator upward (up is good). Unfortunately
NL has been trending downward.

Intermediate term
The next chart is also an update of one I have shown for the past 2 weeks
covering the past 100 trading days showing the OTC in blue and an indicator
showing a 40% trend (4day EMA) of the ratio of NASDAQ new highs to new lows
(NH / (NH + NL)) in blue. Dashed horizontal lines have been drawn at 10% levels
for the indicator; the line is solid at the 50% level. The indicator fell on
Thursday after rising in the early part of the week. Nothing really bad is
likely to happen as long as the indicator is above the 50% level.

Seasonality
Next week includes the 5 trading days prior to the 2nd Friday of July during
the 1st year of the Presidential Cycle.
The tables show the daily return on a percentage basis for the 5 trading days
prior to the 2nd Friday of July during the 1st year of the Presidential Cycle.
OTC data covers the period from 1963 - 2008 and S&P 500 (SPX) data from
1953 - 2008. Prior to 1953 the market traded 6 days a week so that data has
been ignored. There are summaries for both the 1st year of the Presidential
Cycle and all years combined.
The coming week has to be one of the best of the year. The averages have been
up by all measures over the coming week and the OTC has only been down only
once during the 1st year of the Presidential Cycle, in 1969.
Report for the week before the 2nd Friday of July.
The number following the year is the position in the presidential cycle.
Daily returns from Monday to 2nd Friday.
| OTC Presidential Year 1 |
| Year |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thur |
Fri |
Totals |
| 1965-1 |
0.00% |
0.82% |
-0.28% |
-0.06% |
0.83% |
1.31% |
| |
| 1969-1 |
-0.01% |
-0.87% |
-0.44% |
0.37% |
0.79% |
-0.15% |
| 1973-1 |
0.53% |
1.17% |
1.49% |
0.47% |
-0.14% |
3.53% |
| 1977-1 |
0.00% |
0.22% |
-0.16% |
0.32% |
0.53% |
0.91% |
| 1981-1 |
0.15% |
-0.46% |
0.46% |
0.56% |
0.35% |
1.05% |
| 1985-1 |
-0.26% |
-0.22% |
0.46% |
0.67% |
0.62% |
1.27% |
| Avg |
0.10% |
-0.03% |
0.36% |
0.48% |
0.43% |
1.32% |
| |
| 1989-1 |
0.06% |
0.41% |
0.52% |
0.24% |
0.23% |
1.46% |
| 1993-1 |
0.00% |
-0.32% |
-0.49% |
0.56% |
0.44% |
0.19% |
| 1997-1 |
1.42% |
1.19% |
2.50% |
-0.74% |
-1.33% |
3.04% |
| 2001-1 |
1.13% |
-3.15% |
0.47% |
5.26% |
0.44% |
4.14% |
| 2005-1 |
0.00% |
1.04% |
-0.49% |
0.34% |
1.79% |
2.69% |
| Avg |
0.87% |
-0.17% |
0.50% |
1.13% |
0.31% |
2.30% |
| |
| OTC summary for Presidential Year 1 1965 - 2005 |
| Avg |
0.43% |
-0.02% |
0.37% |
0.73% |
0.41% |
1.77% |
| Win% |
71% |
55% |
55% |
82% |
82% |
91% |
| |
| OTC summary for all years 1963 - 2008 |
| Avg |
-0.02% |
-0.13% |
0.24% |
0.26% |
0.37% |
0.72% |
| Win% |
67% |
48% |
58% |
65% |
74% |
65% |
| |
| SPX Presidential Year 1 |
| Year |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thur |
Fri |
Totals |
| 1953-1 |
0.08% |
0.53% |
-0.04% |
-0.29% |
-0.08% |
0.21% |
| 1957-1 |
0.43% |
-0.37% |
0.68% |
-0.39% |
0.45% |
0.80% |
| 1961-1 |
-0.09% |
-0.03% |
-0.56% |
-0.70% |
0.65% |
-0.74% |
| 1965-1 |
0.00% |
-0.20% |
-0.38% |
0.85% |
0.37% |
0.65% |
| |
| 1969-1 |
-1.27% |
-0.33% |
1.00% |
0.61% |
-0.85% |
-0.84% |
| 1973-1 |
0.85% |
1.35% |
2.20% |
-0.28% |
-1.34% |
2.78% |
| 1977-1 |
0.00% |
-0.01% |
-0.51% |
0.35% |
-0.14% |
-0.31% |
| 1981-1 |
0.21% |
0.01% |
0.46% |
0.07% |
0.32% |
1.07% |
| 1985-1 |
-0.31% |
-0.46% |
0.69% |
0.30% |
0.18% |
0.40% |
| Avg |
-0.13% |
0.11% |
0.77% |
0.21% |
-0.36% |
0.62% |
| |
| 1989-1 |
0.65% |
0.54% |
0.31% |
0.04% |
0.57% |
2.12% |
| 1993-1 |
0.00% |
-0.99% |
0.32% |
1.31% |
-0.11% |
0.53% |
| 1997-1 |
0.19% |
0.80% |
1.17% |
-0.53% |
-1.75% |
-0.12% |
| 2001-1 |
0.69% |
-1.44% |
-0.11% |
2.37% |
0.62% |
2.13% |
| 2005-1 |
0.00% |
0.88% |
-0.83% |
0.25% |
1.17% |
1.46% |
| Avg |
0.51% |
-0.04% |
0.17% |
0.69% |
0.10% |
1.22% |
| |
| SPX summary for Presidential Year 1 1953 - 2005 |
| Avg |
0.14% |
0.02% |
0.31% |
0.28% |
0.01% |
0.72% |
| Win% |
70% |
43% |
57% |
64% |
57% |
71% |
| SPX summary for all years 1953 - 2008 |
| Avg |
-0.05% |
-0.04% |
0.18% |
0.13% |
0.27% |
0.49% |
| Win% |
58% |
45% |
56% |
60% |
68% |
64% |
Money supply (M2)
The money supply chart was provided by Gordon Harms. Money supply growth turned
down last week.


Conclusion
Brief sharp declines occur in up markets and, although nasty, I think that
is what Thursday's move was. Seasonally the pattern for next week has been
a little weakness early in the week with a strong finish. I think the seasonal
pattern is likely to be followed.
I expect the major indices to be higher on Friday July 10 than they were on
Thursday July 2.
Last weeks positive forecast was a miss. This report is free to anyone who
wants it, so please tell your friends. They can sign up at: http://alphaim.net/signup.html If
it is not for you, reply with REMOVE in the subject line.
Thank you,
|