|
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. The Bankers own the earth.
Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with
the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again.
However, take away that power, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear
-- as they ought to in order to make this a happier and better world to live
in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your
own slavery, then let them continue to create deposits." ~ Sir Josiah Stamp
(1880-1941), one time governor of the Bank of England, in his Commencement
Address at the University of Texas in 1927. Reportedly he was the second wealthiest
individual in Britain.
Make no mistake about it: in this credit collapse we are witnessing the death
throes of irredeemable currency. In vain have governments and their client
banks tried, for hundreds of years, to graft this repulsive and degenerate
bastard on the living organism of society. The result was always the same:
the healthy organism rejected the unnatural implant in its own good time. The
present episode is no different from earlier ones except, perhaps, in the degree
of the conceitedness of the perpetrators, and in their contempt for the native
intelligence of man.
When on August 15, 1971, Richard Nixon defaulted on the gold obligations of
the United States and declared the irredeemable dollar the "ultimate" means
of payments and liquidator of debt, he was relying on the expert advice of
Chicago economist Milton Friedman. Five years later the world's oldest central
bank, the Swedish Riksbank would bestow upon Friedman the prize it established
in memory of Alfred Nobel. The reward would be in recognition of the brilliance
of Friedman's idea that if a central bank robs the people piecemeal (read:
it dilutes the currency at a fixed rate of, say, 3 percent per annum) then
the victims would not cry "we wuz robbed!" They would never notice the robbery.
In all previous episodes shame and disgrace were part and parcel of the government's
default on its promises to pay. Not so in 1971. In this latest experiment with
irredeemable currency there was a new feature: far from being a disgrace, the
default was presented as a scientific breakthrough; conquering "monetary superstition" epitomized
by gold; a triumph of progress. Sycophant governments and central banks overseas
that were victimized by it and had to swallow unprecedented losses due to the
devaluation of the dollar were not even allowed to say "ouch!" They were forced
to celebrate their own undoing and hail the advent of the New Age of synthetic
credit, irredeemable currencies and irredeemable debts.
The regime of the irredeemable dollar was put to the test soon enough. In
1979 the genie escaped from the bottle. The price of oil, silver, and gold
were quoted at twenty times that prior to 1971; in the case of sugar the rate
of increase was more like forty times, so much so that the Coca Cola Company
found it too expensive to put into coke and started using corn syrup instead.
Interest rates were quoted in double digits well past the teens. There was
panic across the land and around the globe. Hoarding of goods became a way
of life. Everybody was expecting the worst.
It was at this time that the notion of "targeting inflation" was invented.
Previously the claims of central bank power were rather modest. Central banks
were supposed to target short-term interest rates. Later they graduated to
targeting the money supply. Now they were claiming supernatural powers of micromanaging
price increases. It was apparently working, and the genie was put back in the
bottle.
In the intervening three decades policymakers and mainstream economists became
ever more confident that in inflation-targeting they have found the holy grail
of irredeemable currency. Professor Frederic Mishkin of Columbia University,
a former governor of the Federal Reserve, published the gospel of inflation
targeting with the title Monetary Policy Strategy in 2007. In his book
he calls inflation targeting "an information-inclusive strategy for the conduct
of monetary policy." Martin Wolf, the chief economic columnist of the Financial
Times of London explains: inflation targeting makes allowance for all relevant
variables -- exchange rates, stock prices, housing prices and long-term bond
prices -- via their impact on activity and prospective inflation. This, then,
is the new modified holy grail. Cast your net wide enough to catch all that
you want to control. If you do it boldly, you will make people believe that
the government can control everything it wants to control. It is amazing how
much can be accomplished by piling prestidigitation upon prestidigitation.
Ironically, disaster struck just at the time when the prophets of inflation-targeting
became cocky beyond any measure of modesty. They actually had a whole debate
going on in American journals, but also English ones. Ben Bernanke, who in
the meantime was made the chairman of the Federal Reserve, contributed the
keynote address and the title to the debate: "The Great Moderation".
Their description, up to and including the beginning of 2007 of what was happening
in the macro economy, was a reduction in the volatility in the trade cycle:
more consistent growth, less bouts of inflation, more stability. The London
Times published a jubilant piece as recently as early 2007 with the title "The
Great Moderation" which began with the line: "History will marvel at the stability
of our era." It was not meant to be a joke. It was meant to be believed. Complacency
about the almighty nature of monetary policy reached its peak. They celebrated
the success of inflation targeting just when it started to unravel. Policymakers,
central bankers, and their lackeys in academia and journalism, felt inordinately
proud of themselves. They thought they held the whole world in their hands.
The celebration and self-congratulation was premature. Bernanke & Co.
did not know that they were about to be humbled by the markets. Blinded by
the glare of their own glory, none of them foresaw the coming disaster.
Martin Wolf in his column on May 7 talks about "this unforeseen crisis" as
an unmitigated disaster for monetary policy. It leaves fiat money with just
one last chance to put its act together and save its hide. He says: "The holy
grail turned out to be a mirage. If fiat money is not made to work better than
it has, who knows what our children might decide to do in desperation. They
might even decide to bring back and embrace gold". Oh horror of horrors! Wolf
still considers the gold standard an absurdity.
It's kind of strange. It is not the regime of irredeemable currency, whereby
governments are supposed to create wealth by sprinkling some ink on little
scraps of paper, that is considered an absurdity. Of course, Mr. Wolf has the
right of wanting to be pilfered and plundered. But he has no right to advocate
that the rest of us be cheated through this crudest form of plunder forever
and ever.
He is also mistaken when he assumes that Bernanke & Co. still has one
more chance. The chance they just blew was the last. We are witnessing
the closing of the regime of irredeemable currency and irredeemable debt. We
may not know how long its death throes will take, but there will be no other
chance. Financial journalists and mainstream economists, in their blind stupor
acting as cheerleaders for the disastrous monetary policy of the government
and the insane credit policy of the banks, have exhausted and destroyed their
own credibility for once and all.
* * *
Martin Wolf, like most of his colleagues, is a victim of brainwashing inspired
by Keynes that has been going on to discredit the gold standard for some 75
years, but which got a new lift after Friedman inspired Nixon to default. Here
are the facts about the gold dollar that should be made available to the world
through the opening of the Mint to gold, as demanded by the U.S. Constitution.
The gold standard is an indispensable prerequisite of freedom. Without it individuals
are helpless in facing the constant and ongoing encroachment of their property
rights by the government and the banks. The right to demand gold in exchange
for bank notes and bank deposits far transcends the mere technicality of exchange
of one form of money for another. It is the only way to check the unlimited
power of the government manifested by the unlimited creation of bank deposits.
The combination of governmental power and the power of the banks to create
deposits is especially dangerous for the freedom of the individual, because
of the double standard involved. The government exempts banks from the effects
of contract law in exchange for the banks' special treatment accorded to government
debt.
Gold hoarding is not a blemish on the gold standard; it is its main excellence.
When a sufficient number of individuals are disturbed by the encroachment of
this combination of powers, or disapprove the monetary policy of the government
and the credit policy of the banks, they are not helpless under a gold standard.
They can withdraw bank reserves, namely gold, from the system, thereby putting
the government and the banks on notice that unless they mend their ways, and
stop their adventures in debt creation, they will find themselves insolvent
and out of power. The gold standard gives people the upper hand.
It is no accident that all dictatorships set out by limiting the people's
access to gold. It makes no difference whether they march under the banner
of national or international socialism. All totalitarian regimes inflict irredeemable
currency on the people as an instrument of servitude and bondage. Martin Wolf
should know this. The ideal of limited government is meaningless unless reinforced
by a gold standard denying to the government the power of issuing unlimited
amounts of currency. There is no other way of doing this than making the promises
of the government redeemable in something other than more promises of the same
shabby kind.
Once the government makes the currency irredeemable, it puts itself in the
position to curtail the rights and freedoms of the people as it sees fit. Constitutional
government is effectively overthrown. Once the government usurps the public
purse, its power becomes uncontrollable. Budget debate in Parliament or in
Congress becomes an annual farce. Nothing stands in the way of unscrupulous
politicians to undermine constitutional government. The purchasing power of
the currency is constantly undermined year in, year out. The banks are freed
from constraints on them exercised by the people under the gold standard. Pandora's
box of corruption is opened and its contents contaminate the nation's economic,
political, and social system.
Governments which employ irredeemable currency grab unconditional control
over foreign trade, exchange rates, foreign investments and travel, even the
amount of currency an individual can take in or out of the country. The more
powerful governments will buy the allegiance of the less powerful. Out of this
feudalistic web of allegiances financed by irredeemable currency come various
adventures in fomenting and waging wars in far-away lands, spilling the blood
of the young people of the nation for causes alien to them.
Under a gold standard prolonged budget deficits and prolonged unfavorable
balance of payments cannot occur. There are forces limiting persistent losses
of gold which tend to correct the underlying distortion. By contrast, under
the regime of irredeemable currency economic distortions can persist indefinitely.
They ultimately become destructive. This is so because government bureaucrats
cannot possibly provide the same level of wisdom that a people free to act
in their own interest can.
As problems in foreign trade mount, governments will find ever more excuses
for ever more controls. There is no end to the expansion of government power
over the individual until the nation regains the benefits of a gold standard,
requiring that the government retire to its proper role of umpire and relinquish
its role as dominant partner and dictator.
A government can take total control of the people either by the use of military
force, or by the use of irredeemable currency. The former is readily understood,
while the latter is a subtle national drug that is not generally recognized
as such. Rather, it is readily embraced by its victims. For these and similar
reasons irredeemable currency is the favorite device of modern governments
that want to bring people under total control. Indeed, it enables the government
to succeed in controlling the masses while, at the same time, earning their
approval and even their enthusiastic support. Irredeemable currency must be
seen as the habit-forming drug that the government uses to intoxicate people.
Under this intoxication people will want more and more national spending, more
and more government control, and more and more debt.
This intoxication obscures the sad end that arrives when the merry-go-round
is coming to a jerky halt, when credit is exhausted or withdrawn, and the kitty
is found empty. The nation is facing a most serious economic disaster followed
by prolonged economic pain. Unfortunately, government economists, university
professors, and financial journalists have taken their share of the fun and
they failed miserably in their duty to forewarn people of the coming disaster.
It is useless to expect a mass movement on behalf of a sound currency. The
daily experiences of people provide them with a warped outlook. They confirm
in their minds the alleged virtues and benefits of an infinitely inflatable
currency. People lack sufficient understanding of monetary science to see that
no currency can be made infinitely inflatable without inviting disaster. Like
a drug addict, people exposed to irredeemable currency do not regard it as
a dangerous and undermining narcotic agent. Even the loss of purchasing power
does not disturb them to any great extent. Their response is to demand more
money, and they take pride in the fact that the government listens sympathetically
to their demand. They welcome the soaring stock indexes and real estate prices,
and put great stores on them. Heavy taxes and burgeoning debt are not regarded
with anxiety. A frequent and common agitation is for ever more government spending.
* * *
If we are to be saved from the ultimate evil consequences of the regime of
irredeemable currency, needed action must come from the leadership of the opposition
party when it is its turn to take over government. The new President and his
Secretary of the Treasury, or the new Prime Minister and his Secretary of the
Exchequer must be statesmen. They must act as informed and tough monetary surgeons,
men who can and will persuade Congress or Parliament to reinstate redeemable
currency.
Once that step is taken, the people should experience a breath of fresh air.
Government would once more be subordinated to the Constitution, bringing greater
freedom to the people. Optimism should be wide-spread, because the currency
of the people would once more had integrity. Business should prosper, domestic
and foreign trade expand. Imbalances in foreign trade should rectify themselves.
Gold should start to circulate and flow in from abroad. The control of the
public purse would be returned to the people where it belongs if human freedom
is to be preserved and responsible government is to be obtained.
But as the last presidential election in the United States has shown, the
needed leadership is lacking. The party of the opposition is just as much in
thrall to the same toxic ideology as the governing party. The last change of
guards took place in the middle of a financial and economic crisis involving
the destruction of quantities of wealth unprecedented in all history, with
more destruction coming. Yet when the new president appointed officials at
the Treasury, confirmed others at the Federal Reserve, and named economic advisors,
they turned out to be the same men who were responsible for the credit collapse
in the first place. Not only do these officials continue the dangerous course
of the previous administration; they increase the stakes by several orders
of magnitude in announcing more bailouts, more stimulus packages, hence more
government spending, more government debt, and more fiat money creation.
The situation is no better in the United Kingdom, another important country
expecting a change of guards, which could take the initiative to put a peaceful
end to the regime of irredeemable currency now in its death throes. Rather
than initiating a national debate on the utter failure of the present financial
system which was supposed to end bank runs, deflations and depressions, serial
bankruptcies and unemployment for once and all, and on the return to sound
money and sound book-keeping, Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition is plotting a
course how to cure the collapse of bad debt with the injection of more bad
debt.
What this means is that there is no hope for change through peaceful means.
When change finally does come, it will be through violence. When the economic
pain inflicted on the people reaches unbearable heights, law and order will
break down, anarchy and chaos will ensue.
Looking at the ruins of our civilization will be a bitter reminder of what
the great monetary tradition of the English-speaking countries, in ruling out
irredeemable currency and mandating a metallic monetary standard, was designed
to prevent.
Acknowledgement
The author has drawn heavily on Walter E. Spahr's article in
the quarterly Modern Age, Summer, 1960, under the title "The Significance
of the Gold Standard", see also www.professorfekete.com,
April 17.
Calendar of Events
San Francisco School of Economics, San Francisco, California,
July 25, August 1 & August 8, 2009
Investment Seminars: Trading Gold, Wealth Management
The Gold and Silver Basis; Backwardation; Trading Gold in the Present Environment;
Wealth Management under the Regime of Irredeemable Currency. Given by Professor
Fekete and Mr. Sandeep Jaitly of Soditic Ltd., London, U.K. Enrolment is limited,
first come first served. For details, check: www.sfschoolofeconomics.com,
contact: ibischoff@sfschoolofeconomics.com
San Francisco School of Economics, San Francisco, California,
July 27-August 7, 2009
Two-week academic course: Money and Banking, taught in person by Professor
Fekete
Enrolment is limited; first come, first served. TheSyllabus for this course
can be seen on the website: www.professorfekete.com,
For further details, check: www.sfschoolofeconomics.com
For enrolment contact: ibischoff@sfschoolofeconomics.com
San Francisco School of Economics, San Francisco, California,
July 23-August 9, 2009
Private consultation with Professor Fekete available
contact: ibischoff@sfschoolofeconomics.com
University House, Australian National University, Canberra:
first week of November, 2009
Peace and Progress through Prosperity: Gold Standard in the 21st Century
This is the first conference organized by the newly formed Gold Standard Institute.
For further information, e-mail: feketeaustralia@gmail.com,
On the Gold Standard Institute, e-mail philipbarton@goldstandardinstitute.com
Professor Fekete on DVD: Professionally produced DVD recording
of the address before the Economic Club of San Francisco on November 4, 2008,
entitled The Revisionist History of the Great Depression: Can It Happen
Again? plus an interview with Professor Fekete. It is available from www.Amazon.com and
from the Club www.economicclubsf.com at
$14.95 each.
DVD's of the Gold Standard University, Session 3 (Adam
Smith's Real Bills Doctrine and Its Relevance Today); Session 4 (The Bond Market
and the Markey Process Determining the Rate of Interest); Session 5 (A Primer
ont he Gold and Silver Basis) are now available. For details, see the
announcement on the website www.professorfekete.com.
DVD's of the other Sessions will also be available soon.
|