|
Even knowing that the economy is in a recession/depression, it is the kind
of headline that grabs your attention: "Recession Worse Than Prior Estimates,
Revisions Show" by Bob Willis at Bloomberg.com. "The first 12 months of
the US recession," he writes, "saw the economy shrink more than twice as much
as previously estimated, reflecting even bigger declines in consumer spending
and housing, revised figures showed."
By this time I am losing interest, as I suspected as much, and would have
been surprised if things had turned out otherwise. I say this with a certain
haughty-yet-snotty attitude because the Austrian school of economics is so
easy to grasp, so intuitively correct and now so provably correct, that it
is easy to anticipate the long-term when a central bank is creating excessive
amounts of money and credit, especially when the majority of it is used to
expand government spending. Child's play!
So seeing the future clearly in economics is easy, unlike forecasting other
social institutions, like marriage, which I thought meant that I would be happy
for the rest of my life, but which meant that I did not remotely understand
the full ramifications of such an arrangement that was not, and I emphasize
NOT, even hinted at when we were dating, which should be grounds for some kind
of legal action so that I can get my life back, instead of having it wasted
by her, and the stupid kids, and the stupid relatives, and the stupid neighbors,
and the stupid job, and all the stupid stuff you have to do as a result of
being so stupid as to say "Goodbye!" to a life of mindless, selfish hedonism
in the first place where, with any luck, you would be dead by now, lying in
some gutter with a big smile on your stupid face, instead of putting up with
spouses, children, neighbors, et al who are all so stupid that they don't buy
gold, silver and oil even after I always deliberately end the "Happy Birthday" song
with, "And if you're not buying gold, silver and oil, then you are not going
to get your wish because the Wish Fairy knows that you are too stupid to know
what to do with that kinky stuff for which you are secretly wishing."
But this is not about any of that, but about the way that the government has
now "changed the way it accounts for natural disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina," which
ought to make you suspicious, especially as it was done for "eliminating much
of the prior volatility in income calculations", whatever in the hell that
means.
I imagine that the government could use it as an excuse to "find" more
money to spend by reducing accrued costs or disguise the fact that government
is incompetent. Either one.
I personally think it is the latter, and not just because I am a suspicious
and paranoid little rat who thinks that the government is an expensive, disastrous,
giant dead-weight loss that is out to get me, but because another interesting
change is that "Personal income was revised up over the last decade, after
the government boosted its adjustments for the underreporting and non-reporting
of income using more recent data from the Internal Revenue Service."
Of course, I think this is so the government can now say, "Hey! Income was
up over the last decade, so shut up about how we are a bunch of incompetent
and dangerous bunch of arrogant pinheads who actually believe the stupid stuff
we say, like how we say that continual government deficit-spending and continual
expansions of money and credit by the Federal Reserve are some kind of blessing
and not the most stupid things that we could have possibly done!"
The "found money", in case you were wondering, apparently comes from income
increases as a result of the housing boom, and "in the most recent years reflect
gains from rents, interest and proprietors' income", as if that distorted boost
to income is now "the new norm" or something! Hahaha!.
Finally, the Commerce Department "shifted food services, which include
meals purchased at restaurants or served in schools, out of the food category."
Paradoxically, "As a result, the Fed's preferred inflation gauge - which tracks
consumer spending and excludes food and fuel - was pushed up by 0.2 percentage
points for the three-year period from 2006 to 2008."
Later, they explained that "The reason for this is that costs of meals away
from home are not as volatile as fresh food, the government said, and therefore
services should be included in the measure commonly known as the core index."
They now compute inflation in "meals away from home" by disregarding the
cost of the food, which is going up, and look only at the cost of the labor
in preparing the food, which is going up, but not by as much right now because
unemployed people are willing to work for peanuts? Hahaha!
If blatant corruption to disguise inflation and incompetence is not enough
to convince you to buy gold, then there is nothing I can say to change your
mind.
Fortunately, that means more for me, and at lower costs, until the day when
you say "Oops! Oh, woe is me for not having listened to the Wonderful And Wise
Mogambo (WAWM) when he said to buy gold, silver and oil, and now I rue that
fateful day, just as he said I would, and I see that he was right when he said
to buy gold, silver and oil, which would have made me, too, say, 'Whee! This
investing stuff is easy!'"
Until next time,
|