|
As the deflation versus inflation debate rages on, both sides present reasonable
arguments that sound plausible. I am in the camp that believes stocks, commodities,
corporate bonds and real estate have much further to fall. Now falling prices
are not the same thing as deflation, but they are a visible symptom. To be
honest, I am a pragmatist. I am not as concerned about getting my exact definitions
right as I am understanding what to do with my savings.
I believe all major asset classes are deflating in value relative to Gold
and will continue to do so for at least a few more years. Cash in the form
of US Dollars, since it is the reserve currency of the world (for now), should
do fine as well for a while but presents significant risk as the deflation
grinds on. This all goes back to a concept I have embraced known as Exter's
liquidity pyramid. See
here for some background info and below is a reproduction of a common rendering
of this pyramid floating around in cyberspace:

When you think about the end stages of this deflation/liquidity pyramid, you
realize how similar deflationists and hyperinflationists are in an idealized
model. When a fiat credit bubble pops, assets at the top of the pyramid decline
in value and "liquidity" flees these asset classes and scrambles down the pyramid
towards the apex for safety. The moves are not always orderly, but as deflation
intensifies, physical cash in the form of currency notes and Gold become highly
valuable relative to standard investment asset classes like stocks, commodities,
real estate and corporate bonds.
This fits with the classic saying "cash is king" during deflation. The problem
is that you have to hold the right kind of cash. Almost no one alive today
has lived under a true Gold standard where paper cash notes could readily be
converted into physical Gold in the same manner that paper dollars can now
be converted into quarters and dimes. I don't mean buying Gold at a coin shop,
I mean exchanging paper notes for Gold at a bank or government office without
incurring fees or paying a premium.
Now many scoff at this notion and think it is antiquated/quaint, restrictive
or just plain bat shit crazy as a monetary system. The fact that otherwise
rational and sane people laugh at the concept of Gold as money just goes to
show how truly off course and ignorant America in particular has become regarding
monetary issues. There are very few who don't experience at least some cognitive
dissonance when the government keeps spending more and more money it doesn't
have and promising more and more things we can't afford as a nation. These
things happen because we have decreed as a nation that paper promises are the
same as money and indeed they function this way for day to day transactions
and will continue to do so for quite some time.
And during a bad deflation, paradoxically, the value of this intrinsically
worthless paper becomes more valuable. In a sense, it is a cyclical bull market
for cash in the midst of a perpetual secular bear market that characterizes
all fiat currencies. No market moves in a straight line. It is not so much
that cash is more intrinsically valuable, it simply falls in value slower than
other asset classes so that cash can buy more assets.
For the saver and investor, it is thus prudent during deflation to hoard cash,
as that cash can buy a greater number of assets later. In other words, if one
moved to cash before the housing crash started, then one could buy a bigger
house than 2 years ago. House prices are deflating relative to cash. Again,
there is monetary inflation and deflation and there is asset price inflation
and deflation. While they are not the same, I am not a high level economist
in the academic world. I am trying to figure out where to keep my savings and
investment money. If oil goes down to $20/barrel, does it really matter if
the inflationists are technically right because the base money supply continues
to expand through it all?
So, unlike many who harp on the subject, I am not as concerned with getting
the academic concept correct as making sure my money is betting on the right
asset classes over the next 5 years. So, in a sense, I actually am more interested
in the symptoms rather than the underlying disease when it comes to investing.
Having said that, I still think we are in a strong net deflationary environment
right now. A modern fiat system is credit based and credit was functioning
as a money substitute during the previous bubble. Now that credit is contracting
at a scary pace, it is overwhelming the bureaucratic efforts to "reflate" the
system.
Where the argument of the deflationists and hyperinflationists come together
is at the very apex of the pyramid. Those who shun the notion of Gold as money
are going to feel the pain when history repeats yet again. Because in the final
painful layer of deflation, people flee paper fiat notes for true non-debasable
and non-debt based cash. That's where only Gold comes in handy. You see, at
the apex of Exter's pyramid, paper fiat cash notes deflate relative to Gold,
which is paradoxically inflationary in a sense as it requires more paper cash
to buy Gold if this phase comes to fruition (and I believe it will).
In a sense, this is somewhat akin to itulip's "ka-poom" theory where a deflationary
crash (they call it "disinflationary," but whatever) is followed by a currency
crisis that re-ignites inflation in a hurry. This is also somewhat akin to
Trace Mayer at runtogold.com talking about fiat currency evaporating as the
credit contraction intensifies. In the 1930s (the last deflationary/credit
contractionary depression the United States went through), this event occurred
via a re-pegging of the US Dollar to Gold after making private Gold ownership
illegal. Overnight,
by government decree, people's savings we re-valued lower by 70%!
So in the end, both the deflationists and inflationists will be proven right
in a pragmatic sense, but I think we have to go through further deflationary
pain before the step of a one-time rapid currency debasement occurs. Now this
debasement could occur intentionally by government decree or via capital flight
from the United States and either is possible. One of the reasons this is predictable
in my opinion is because every wave of deflation is followed by more and more
intense fiscal stimulus that is less and less able to be supported by underlying
economic reality. In the end, something's gotta give.
This is not gloom and doom and I don't think the world is going to end. This
is an actionable thesis that is worthy of investment consideration. Gold provides
portfolio insurance that is growing more valuable by the day. Maybe this time
is different. Maybe Obama and Ben Bernanke are so amazing that they can go
ahead and spend another $1,000 trillion and no one will care and the rest of
the world will buy our paper promises with an increasingly rabid appetite.
Maybe unrealistic paper promises can be made ad infinitum and all economic
realities will be suspended forever. Maybe we can re-inflate the credit bubble
again and everyone can have a house, a car and a plane with no money down regardless
of income and plus get a $1 million signing bonus at the time of closing. I'm
guessing not, though.
Switching some of one's savings into physical (not paper) Gold now, while
it can still be readily found, provides insurance against what is now an almost
unavoidable future currency debasement event. Only the timing is still unclear
in my mind, but you can bet that such an event won't be announced in advance
and you won't be able to find physical Gold as a retail investor when it happens.
Cash will ultimately deflate further relative to Gold and when it happens,
the move will likely be fast and powerful. I think a dip of the Gold price
to the low 900s or high 800s is dead ahead and will provide another great buying
opportunity.
|