|
The
Economist magazine had the Buttonwood blog titled "Law of Easy Money", which
immediately gets your hopes up that there is such a thing as "easy money",
which actually exists (just ask Connecticut's Senator Chris Dodd!), but unfortunately
not for guys like you and me who don't have the political power and grease
to extort money and skim taxpayers, which is gratuitously rude and scandalous,
I agree, but which only shows the depth of my contempt for the huge, huge,
cancerously huge, ridiculously and dangerously incompetent, ignorant and stupid
system of governments in America, as exemplified by the despicable Congress
and the even more despicable Senator Dodd.
But it turns out that "Law of Easy Money" was just a clever play on words,
and was the story of how John Law talked France's king, Louis XIV, who had
borrowed and spent France to bankruptcy, into letting him start a bank and
force everyone to pay their taxes with a new kind of paper money that Mr. Law's
bank would create and, soon enough, loaning more gigantic supplies of paper
money to finance the development of the king's colonies in the New World, a
fiasco now known as the Mississippi Bubble, an economic bubble where everybody
got wiped out financially, the country was ruined and the aristocracy had their
heads chopped off, which I am sure was not in the prospectus or brochure that
the king got from Mr. Law.
However, the essay is not about how the French in the 18th century were a
bunch of buttheads who didn't know any better, or how we are a bigger bunch
of buttheads who should have known better in the 20th century, or even about
how we are going to suffer in the 21st century for knowing better but not acting
better, but about, as the subhead says, "A 300-year-old example of quantitative
easing."
Of course, if you had to read A Tale of Two Cities in high school where all
you learned was that it opens with the immortal line "It was the best of times,
it was the worst of times", or if you have ever seen a movie on TV about the
French Revolution, you know it ends Very, Very Badly (VVB).
The blog admits that "the parallels with today are not exact", which is true
in that we seem to dress a lot worse in the ruffled-shirt and hat-with-feathery-plumes
department, a grim sartorial fact which is not mentioned, but two differences
which are mentioned are "Law's system took just four years to collapse; today's
fiat money regime has been running for nearly 40 years", and "the growth in
money supply has been less excessive this time."
Lest you take any cheer from that, beware that the summation says, "But one
lesson from Law's sorry tale endures: attempts to maintain asset prices above
their fundamental value are eventually doomed to failure."
And what big failures they are going to be, too, as I gather from The Wall
Street Journal reporting that "Much to their dismay, Americans learned last
year that they 'owned' Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Well, meet their cousin,
Ginnie Mae or the Government National Mortgage Association, which will soon
join them as a trillion-dollar packager of subprime mortgages." Trillion-dollar!
In case you didn't know, "Ginnie's mission is to bundle, guarantee and then
sell mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration, which is Uncle
Sam's home mortgage shop. Ginnie's growth is a by-product of the FHA's spectacular
growth. The FHA now insures $560 billion of mortgages - quadruple the amount
in 2006."
Now, the scam has gotten so huge that "Among the FHA, Ginnie, Fannie and Freddie,
nearly nine of every 10 new mortgages in America now carry a federal taxpayer
guarantee"! Yikes! 90 percent of mortgages!
This probably explains why "Only last week, Ginnie announced that it issued
a monthly record of $43 billion in mortgage-backed securities in June", which
is pretty astonishing when you multiply $43 billion in one month by 12 months
in a year, and I suggest you not do it because the answer will scare you to
death.
Not so astonishing, then, is the news that "Ginnie Mae's mortgage exposure
is expected to top $1 trillion by the end of next year - or far more than double
the dollar amount of 2007."
And all of this money, all these trillions and trillions in new money, must
come, directly or indirectly, from the Federal Reserve creating it, which means
that A Lot Of New Money (ALONM) is being jammed into the economy, which means
(if you are a Junior Mogambo Ranger (JMR)) that the government is acting like
irresponsible halfwit scumbags, and doubly so in letting the Federal Reserve
do it, and that history has shown that the only thing that is going to save
your proletariat butt in the inevitable collapse is gold.
History is not quite as convincing about armored bunkers in one's backyard
or the efficacy of sheer firepower against the sustained assault of hordes
of desperate, angry, starving people in a decidedly "nothing to lose" mood
who are outraged that they were betrayed when they trusted the value of the
dollar and the Federal Reserve supposedly maintaining its purchasing power
via monetary policy, and they trusted the Congress to handle fiscal policy
wisely and who had the power to control the Federal Reserve's handling of monetary
policy, but we'll soon see!
But at least we have the safety and security of gold!
|