|
In following with my promise to call out the nations most insolvent, publicly
traded banks, I am publishing part two of my short list of Doo Doo banks. If
you haven't been following this self-perpetuating missive, see:
- The
Doo Doo 32, revisited
- The
FDIC as a catalyst, or the new Doo Doo 32!
- Thoughts
on the June 2009 Case Shiller report: Are prices really improving?
- The
Fed Believes Secrecy is in Our Best Interests. Here are Some of the Secrets
- More
on the FDIC as a Catalyst...
- Discussion
of the 210% Texas Ratio Bank
We have looked into 14 additional banks out of the group previous shortlisted
from the original 869 bank scan (see The
FDIC as a catalyst, or the new Doo Doo 32!) and almost all the banks in
the additional list have better metrics compared with the original list of
8 banks published last week. We have selected two of the 14 banks analyzed
recently based on the banks' loan and investment portfolio, operating metrics
and valuation ratio.
Capitol Bancorp:
-
While the probability of bankruptcy of this bank is relatively high over
the 14 banks analyzed recently, the low absolute share price and low valuation
multiple makes it risky for me to short. The bank has market cap of $93
mn and share price of $5.3 and is trading at Price-to-tangible book value
of 0.37x
-
The banks' Eyles test (a measure of banks loan loss reserve strength)
is the highest among the analyzed 2nd tier of 14 banks at 75.8% (i.e) bank
has negative cushion (NPA's less reserves) of 75.8% over tangible equity.
-
The bank has negative cushion of 60.1% as of June 30, 2009.
-
The banks NPA's to tangible equity as of 2Q09 stood at 147.4% while non
performing loans plus 90 days past due loans to tangible equity stood at
105.8%
-
The banks NPA's to loans is at 8.0% while non performing loans plus 90
days past due loans to loans is at 5.8%.
-
The bank has high adjusted leverage of 22.6x.
-
Efficiency ratio is very high at 108.6% in 2Q09 and the bank has been
reporting losses over the last five quarters
| CAP BANCORP LTD |
| Price (August 27, 2009) |
5.3 |
| Market cap (in mn) |
92.8 |
| P/B |
0.3x |
| P/Tangible BV |
0.4x |
| |
| Loan Loss coverage YTD |
-0.3 |
| Texas ratio |
103.8% |
| Eyles Test |
303643.0 |
| Shortfall from current reserve for loan loss |
189428.0 |
| Shortfall as % of tangible shareholders' equity |
75.8% |
| |
| Cushion (Reserve less NPL+90 days due) |
-60.1% |
| Adjusted leverage |
22.6x |
| |
| NPA / Equity |
147.4% |
| NPA / Total Loans |
8.0% |
| |
| NPL and 90 days due/ Equity |
105.8% |
| NPL and 90 days due/ Total Loans |
5.8% |
| |
| NPL and 90 days due and 30 days due/ Equity |
na |
| NPL and 90 days due and 30 days due/ Total Loans |
na |
| |
| |
| Loan exposure |
| Residential real estate loans to tangible common equity |
3.58x |
| Commercial real estate loans to tangible common equity |
11.21x |
| |
| Investment securities exposure |
| Total investment portfolio to tangible common equity |
0.19x |
| Level 3 assets to tangible common equity |
0.00x |
| |
| AFS break up |
| Level 1 |
0.0% |
| Level 2 |
100.0% |
| Level 3 |
0.0% |
| |
| Unrealized gains (losses) as % of amortized cost |
0.3% |
| After tax unrealized gains (losses) as % tangible equity |
0.0% |
| |
| Troubled Securities exposure |
| Privately issued RMBS to tangible common equity |
na |
| CMBS to tangible common equity |
na |
| AMBS to tangible common equity |
na |
| Other debt securities to tangible common equity |
na |
| Equity securities to tangible common equity |
na |
| Total |
na |
Subscriber Short Candidate 2 (subscribers may download the
summary overview of this company here Doo
Doo Bank Short List, part 2 2009-09-02 00:20:59 752.29 Kb:
- Although in terms of probability of bankruptcy this bank trails
over the four banks identified previously, the bank still has weak balance
sheet metrics compared to most of the 14 additional scanned banks. However
taking into consideration the relatively high liquidity and market cap (over
4 banks identified last week), availability of options with relatively narrow
spreads, poor operating metrics (over rest of 14 banks and industry standards),
high valuation ratio and high absolute share price this bank merits itself
in the final list of 6 banks.
|
Reggie
Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/
Who am I?
Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking
maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis.
I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall
Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my
own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following
the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition,
a contrarian to the nth degree.
Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing
to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is
supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am
not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am
an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and
Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance,
I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available,
regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special
favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and
I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked
collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make
a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and
the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post
and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as
I am and our constituency.
I pay for significant information and data, and am well
aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research
lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own
research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available
- to both individuals and institutions.
So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment
activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I
produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute,
as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author
and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits
annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open
source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and
fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu
of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to
be.
Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics
portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to
deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion
front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which
now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks,
hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who
is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing
spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new
investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and
success to heart.
So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new
media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering,
real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze
and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more
in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to
know more about me.
Visit his blog Boom
Bust Blog.
Copyright © 2007-2009 Reggie Middleton
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|