|
The housing market is rapidly deteriorating under the surface. A housing price
collapse is a highly deflationary event because it affects so many banks and
individuals. We
are not close to a bottom in the real estate market and it is essentially
almost impossible for it to come before the 2011-2012 time frame. If our government
insists on continuing to subvert what's left of the free market system in real
estate, it may take another decade to find the bottom.
Here's a recent headline for you: "Nine
years worth of condos flood uptown Charlotte." This is Charlotte, North
Carolina folks. We're not talking about an obvious place like southern Florida,
California, or Las Vegas. We're talking about a fairly typical non-coastal
American city (I mean no offense to those in Charlotte who believe they are
above or below average). Nine years supply at the current sales pace while
credit continues to get tighter and unemployment is still rising?!
Banks
are now hiding foreclosures and refusing to list foreclosed homes on the
market! Even worse, banks
are allowing people who stop paying their mortgage to stay in their homes
for 2 YEARS OR MORE without taking back the house.
This means that there is an absolutely huge pent-up supply of homes that
will need to be sold onto the market eventually. This supply will hit right
as the psychology for "investing" in real estate turns seriously south. People
will be looking to rent, not buy, and yet an absolute flood of homes will need
to be brought to market in this environment. By the way, the ability of people
to buy (due to worsening unemployment and and ever tightening lending standards)
will have decreased further as this supply eventually makes its way to the
market. Many
of these homes will be rented, forcing rents to decline as well (which
in turn lowers the value of a home for a potential investor looking to buy
a rental property).
Real estate is dead. Who can revive it? Government can (NOT). But that won't
stop government from trying. "Stimulus" buying incentives trying to revive
a burst bubble is a waste of people's hard-earned money and won't stop the
slide in real estate prices, but it will destroy taxpayer wealth and lock unsuspecting
citizens into debt on a depreciating asset.
According to an article in the Financial Times, Fannie and Freddie have "backed
more than 70 per cent of new home loans since 2008." These loans, of
course, will go bad in high numbers. Fannie and Freddie also have $5.5 trillion
of outstanding debt and guarantees on securities and a combined $1.5 trillion
of mortgages and mortgage-backed securities on their balance sheets according
to the same article as well as getting heavily involved in the "loan modification" push
from the current administration. The
government is now backing 90% of new mortgages according to a different article
in the Washington Post, since private banks are smart enough to stop
making loans in this environment. So, the taxpayer will get ass-raped (again)
as this house of cards is allowed to gradually collapse and implode. Anyone
with any common sense can see that this is a huge pending disaster that now
cannot be avoided, but I guarantee that politicians will act surprised when
this causes a second (and third) real estate and fiscal crisis.
The moral hazards now in place have staggering implications. If your neighbors
can live in their house for free, why should you pay the mortgage? If you're
going to have to pay for the housing crisis anyway via taxes and looting of
the U.S. Treasury by the banks, why not get something for yourself and/or your
family by living for free and then walking away (might as well trash the place
on the way out, too, just to get even and let off a little steam). I am not
advising such behavior (though walking away may well be the best option for
many individuals depending on state law and specific circumstances and I understand
the frustration behind a "trash out"), but I am saying that such thinking and
actions make sense to a significant portion of those who currently hold a mortgage.
And for those who don't follow such things, this is not a subprime borrower
issue (that's yesterday's news!), this
is a prime borrower issue!
The housing wealth effect in reverse is also a powerful deflationary concept.
People in aggregate can no longer use their homes as ATMs by taking out home
equity lines of credit and other cash-out refinances to fuel consumption. Predictions
that half
of U.S. mortgages will be underwater by 2011 are not one crazy bear's thoughts,
they are mainstream views! People who owe more on their homes than they are
worth feel poorer and act accordingly (in aggregate). This decreases consumption
and the consumer is needed to get "growth" back on track in the U.S.
And what about commercial real estate? Everyone knows this shoe is dropping
right here and right now as retailers, restaurants and real estate-related
businesses (among other types of businesses) see their sales drop off a cliff
and are unable to make lease payments. Here's a brief
summary of some ballpark numbers of the size of the problem, though I note
with amusement that the author of this piece is already calling for a bailout
(when in doubt, put it on the taxpayers' tab!).
All this real estate debt and all the pending defaults that will help lower
the staggering amount of debt outstanding are highly deflationary. They will
ensure a steady and high rate of bank failures for at least the next few years.
To make things worse, the FDIC is essentially bankrupt already and we are just
getting started with the bank failures. The FDIC is also conveniently
ignoring undercapitalized banks for as long as possible (because they are
broke and don't want the bad press of tapping their U.S. Treasury line of credit,
which of course they are going to have to do eventually). This will end up
costing taxpayers even more money when the involved banks are finally placed
into receivership.
With banks unwilling and/or unable to lend (because they are scared and/or
insolvent) and with citizens broke, drowning in debt and fearing a pink slip
every day, the private, non-federal, for-profit federal reserve bank corporation
is not going to be able to spark price inflation in asset classes like stocks,
commodities or corporate bonds. And you can forget real estate. This popped
bubble ain't coming back for at least a generation. Even once we hit bottom,
we will scrape along the bottom for a few (several?) years.
This so-called gloom and doom is good news for savers and renters! Not only
will home prices continue to fall, but rents will fall as well, so it will
be cheaper and cheaper to live on a monthly expense basis and you will be able
to save more money each year to buy a house in the future. This, of course,
assumes that you can keep your job and income level and you put your savings
in a safe place.
Consider putting some of those savings into physical Gold on the next Gold
price drop, as Gold will continue to rise relative to real estate prices and
provides insurance against a currency event that won't stop deflation but will
devalue the U.S. Dollar significantly. Here's a chart stolen from an article
by Adrian Ash at bullionvault.com (and defiled with my scribbles) that shows
how much further housing prices will drop when priced in Gold before we reach "the" bottom
in real estate in the U.S.:

There will be deals of a lifetime in real estate (even
better than this one, which by the way shows that we have moved beyond
the 1st inning in this real estate collapse) over the next decade for those
who are patient and who can maintain some capital. In the mean time, the
ongoing real estate bubble popping is an 800,000 pound deflationary gorilla
that cannot be ignored in the inflation vs. deflation debate.
|