|
The following is an excerpt from commentary that originally appeared
at Treasure Chests for
the benefit of subscribers on Tuesday, September 15th, 2009.
On one side of the formula we have the continued need for speed in monetary
creation by whatever means, capably characterized by Doug Noland in his weekly
commentary explaining that while it will all end badly, government largesse
will likely get out of control before its all over. The point he is getting
at here is that because of all it's meddling, the government (and us) is locked
in an inflation death grip it necessarily needs to keep building on or face
implosion. So in essence, Doug is alluding to the risk of hyperinflation,
or the closest we will ever come to it on a macro-scale. And he is perfectly
correct in this accounting of our dire circumstances, and the eventual disastrous
effects of all this government intervention to keep the bailout finance bubble
growing. One day this thing is going to pop, like all bubbles do, and it will
be game over for the global economy, US Dollar ($) hegemony, runaway socialism,
and unchecked fiat currency regimes.
And as per our discussion last week, enter Robert
Prechter and his thinking that in spite the need for speed discussed
above, the bureaucracy will fail in its attempts to keep inflating with abandon
because the consumer is about to cave in, scuttling any such attempts, predicated
on the concept the larger Elliott and Kondratiev wave
patterns are suggestive deflation should grip the macro sooner than later.
And this sentiment is also being touted as a timely matter by Harry
Dent right now as well, adding considerable weight to this call, because
he sees the two big D's coming into play - those being deleveraging and demographics.
So the question then arises, which camp is right - the deflation or inflation
camp? Let's take a look at this question to see if we cannot arrive at an
appropriate answer within the increasingly complicated tapestry of our economies.
For me, it's all about deleveraging, where demographic trends will work to
exacerbate the credit contraction trend into the future. Based on this belief,
you might have guessed that I sit in the deflation camp as far as this being
the primary condition of the larger economy, however one would need to be living
in a vacuum not to notice the largesse (inflation) the bureaucracy has and
continues to let loose, so you see there are dual paradigms that exist at the
same time, with the latter designed to counter the former. In the end however,
which for our purposes is fast approaching in a cyclical sense if the deflationists
are correct, one paradigm will consume the other and become the obvious winner,
with inflation's reign under the Keynesian influence most likely to finally
succumb to gravity. We know this to be true because sectors that are not benefiting
from monetization practices are seeing price weakness already, and the rest
will follow when foreigners finally cut our drunken bureaucracy off of cheap
credit.
Even without this things don't look good in the credit markets, where we have
another mortgage
debt implosion scheduled for next year already, one where unless accelerated
monetization and low interest rates are maintained, the bureaucracy will be
unable to keep real
estate loans from joining all other sources of credit contraction, locking
in a deflationary spiral the likes of which has never been witnessed in human
history previously in either scale or scope. And who knows, the larger sequence
could be starting right now formally with an apparent trade
war between the US and China brewing. Is this why China is bringing its
gold reserves back home for safekeeping,
along with implementing a partial
gold standard to protect its economy? If you need to think long about the
answer to that question you are not doing enough reading, where this issue
should be taken very seriously by all because no matter where you live or what
you do.
Escalating trade wars would likely end globalization as we know it much as
the Smoot Hawley
Tariff Act of 1930 did the same over the next decade on a smaller scale.
You had a spend happy democrat in the White House back then, and we have another
one today consistently making history again, where igniting a trade war to
guarantee a decade of Depression was all that was missing from the silhouette.
And now, that piece of the puzzle has fallen into place too, all in good timing
to trigger Chinese reprisals across a variety of markets they influence, with
debt and precious metals topping the list undoubtedly. All they need to do
is cut back further on US debt purchases and push gold comfortably over the
$1,000 mark to send a message to Washington that they 'must be high', not that
the drug addicts (they are hooked on printing money and feel invincible) in
the bureaucracy would notice.
Be that as it may, if something like this were to occur in coming weeks concurrent
to the seasonal
inversion in stocks topping out in extreme timing territory (October /
November), we would have the fundamentals to match the larger degree cycle
turns (think Elliott and Kondratiev waves)
in place, painting a scary picture for equities in 2010. You will remember
this is Prechter's call, that next year would go down in the record books in
the deflationary event department based on the Grand
Supercycle wave structure in stock markets around the world. And based
on the way things are developing this fall to set the trends in motion, it
appears the dominos are all falling right on schedule. Even the September quadruple
witching in the futures markets is helping the cause in this regard in that
put / call ratios are high enough to aid price managers in continuing the low
volume squeeze in stocks, with the trend about to be tested apparently. (See
Figure 1)
Figure 1


There is no more significant test of the trend than the155-exponential moving
average (EMA) on the monthly, the ultimate 'trend definer' in being the optimum
Fibonacci derivative that has proven reliable in measuring profound directional
changes. And as you can see above, the S&P 500 (SPX) is set to test the
trend at 1070, where a break above this key resistance level would put stocks
back into hyper-bubble mode. (I will discuss this further below as well.) In
knowing how the psychology of markets work however, one would know such an
outcome is not likely on an extended basis because once broken, bubbles of
this scale do not return normally, which has been the experience throughout
the ages. (i.e. think the South
Sea Bubble, etc.) The Nikki is a good modern day example of this, and is
likely leading US / global stocks in this regard, where it will probably never
see the 1989 highs ever again.
The world's stock markets are simply more complicated these days, but not
less profound in the sense bubbles associated with the last Grand Supercycle
top in equities was also global in scale, albeit participation levels within
the general population have never reached such extremes before. Even the peasants
of third world countries have gotten involved in the present day mania, suggestive
the hangover will be long lasting and profound even if reorganizations of new
fiat currency based economies were possible, which of course is likely not
the case. Once confidence and cooperation are lost on this scale it does not
come back for generations, not without some new earth-breaking technology to
formulate new economies anchored in geometric efficiency gains. (i.e. think
the wheel, steam power, the microchip, etc.)
So, the next time the SPX falls through the 233-month EMA, as denoted above,
you will know a high probability exists a Grand Supercycle Degree event in
stocks could be unfolding, suggestive stocks could plunge to unimaginable levels
to most. And you will see this same sentiment as it pertains to the SPX seen
above denoted below with respect to the Dow, along with a target crash zone
we should all hope holds. Because if the Dow cannot hold the 3,000 to 4,000-crash
zone, then we could witness a 90% plus retrace, potentially involving a complete
breakdown in modern day society. To hold this support zone with gold able to
rally into the same numeric (a Dow / Gold Ratio of unity) would be a sign that
new currency regimes involving partial gold backing would likely be formulated
and define exchange in trade for a period of time. Again however, this does
not mean the global stock markets will ever return to previous highs. (See
Figure 2)
Figure 2


Unfortunately we cannot carry on past this point, as the remainder of this
analysis is reserved for our subscribers. Of course if the above is the kind
of analysis you are looking for this is easily remedied by visiting our continually
improved web site to
discover more about how our service can help you in not only this regard, but
also in achieving your financial goals. For your information, our newly reconstructed
site includes such improvements as automated subscriptions, improvements to
trend identifying / professionally annotated charts, to the more detailed
quote pages exclusively designed for independent investors who like to
stay on top of things. Here, in addition to improving our advisory service,
our aim is to also provide a resource center, one where you have access to
well presented 'key' information concerning the markets we cover.
And if you have any questions, comments, or criticisms regarding the above,
please feel free to drop
us a line. We very much enjoy hearing from you on these matters.
Good investing all.
|
Captain Hook
TreasureChests.info
Treasure Chests is a market timing service specializing
in value-based position trading in the precious metals and equity markets with
an orientation geared to identifying intermediate-term swing trading opportunities.
Specific opportunities are identified utilizing a combination of fundamental,
technical, and inter-market analysis. This style of investing has proven very
successful for wealthy and sophisticated investors, as it reduces risk and
enhances returns when the methodology is applied effectively. Those interested
in discovering more about how the strategies described above can enhance your
wealth should visit our web site at Treasure
Chests.
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion and
is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived
from sources and utilizing methods believed reliable, but we cannot accept
responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of this analysis.
Comments within the text should not be construed as specific recommendations
to buy or sell securities. Individuals should consult with their broker and
personal financial advisors before engaging in any trading activities. We are
not registered brokers or advisors. Certain statements included herein may
constitute "forward-looking statements" with the meaning of certain securities
legislative measures. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance
or achievements of the above mentioned companies, and / or industry results,
to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Do your own due diligence.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages
are copyrighted by treasurechests.info Inc. No part of these pages, either
text or image may be used for any purpose other than personal use. Therefore,
reproduction, modification, storage in a retrieval system or retransmission,
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, for reasons
other than personal use, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
Copyright © 2003-2010 treasurechests.info
Inc. All rights reserved.
Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2010
SafeHaven.com
ADVERTISEMENTS
« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the
individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven
or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please
visit RSSHelp for instructions. »
|