|
Last week I was very pleased that the Financial Services Committee held a
hearing on the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, HR 1207. The bill has 295
cosponsors and there is also strong support for the companion bill in the Senate.
This hearing was a major step forward in getting the bill passed.
I was pleased that the hearing was well-attended, especially considering that
it was held on a Friday at nine o'clock in the morning! I have been talking
about the immense, unchecked power of the Federal Reserve for many years, while
the attention of Congress was always on other things. It was gratifying to
see my colleagues asking probing questions and demonstrating genuine concern
about this important issue as well.
The witness testifying in favor of HR 1207 made some very strong points, which
was no surprise considering the bill is simply common sense. It was also no
surprise that the witness testifying against the bill had no good arguments
as to why a full audit should not be conducted promptly. He attempted to make
the case that the fed is already sufficiently accountable to Congress and that
the current auditing policy is adequate. The fact is that the Fed comes to
Congress and talks about only what it wants to talk about, and the GAO audits
only what the current laws allow to be audited. The really important things
however, are off limits. There are no convincing arguments that it is in the
best interests of the American people for anything the Fed does to be off limits.
It has been argued that full disclosure of details of funding facilities like
TALF and PDCF that enabled massive bailouts of Wall Street would damage the
financial position of those firms and destabilize the economy. In other words,
if the American people knew how rotten the books were at those banks and how
terribly they messed up, they would never willingly invest in them, and they
would fail. Failure is not an option for friends of the Fed. Therefore, the
funds must be stolen from the people in the dark of night. This is not how
a free country works. This is not how free markets work. That is crony corporatism
and instead of being a force for economic stabilization, it totally undermines
it.
If the Fed gave its actual arguments against a full audit, they would not
have mentioned anything about political independence or economic stability.
Instead they would admit they don't want to be audited because they enjoy their
current situation too much. Under the guise of currency control, they are able
to help out powerful allies on Wall Street, in exchange for lucrative jobs
or who-knows-what favors later on. An audit would expose the Fed as a massive
fraud perpetrated on this country, enriching a privileged few bankers at the
top of our economic food chain, and leaving the rest of us with massively devalued
dollars which we are forced to use by law. An audit would make people realize
that, while Bernie Madoff defrauded a lot of investors for a lot of money,
the Fed has defrauded every one of us by destroying the value of our money.
An honest and full accounting of how the money system really works in this
country would mean there is not much of a chance the American people would
stand for it anymore.
|