|
For the sixth time since September 2002 the USA has issued an Orange Alert,
the second highest of the 5 level colour-coded terrorist alert system. Since
inception in March 2002 there have only been two alerts, Yellow and Orange.
The lowest two, Blue and Green, and the highest, Red have never been issued.
Red alert would effectively mean martial law if executed and would only occur
if an attack were under way or occurred.
Curiously to date the Orange alerts have come at interesting points in time.
The first one was issued around the one year anniversary of September 11, 2001
at a time when the Enron scandals were boiling over noting possible George
Bush involvement; the second in February 2003 when Colin Powell was to speak
to the UN urging rapid movement against Iraq; the third in March 2003 just
prior to the actual invasion of Iraq; the fourth in May 2003 just following
Bush's "Mission Accomplished" and following a wave of attacks in Saudi Arabia
and Morocco; the fifth in December 2004/January 2005 surrounding the outbreak
of Mad Cow disease; and finally the current one just as the Democratic Convention
ended and the Democrats were looking for a convention boost.
It was revealed that the information for this Orange Alert was actually primarily
based on information 3 to 4 years old. That of course has raised many questions
as to the basis for the alerts keeping in mind that the record of the current
administration is not good when it comes to intelligence information (see invasion
of Iraq based on WMD as an example). While there has been nary one terrorist
attack it has managed to both increase fear and cynicism about the nature of
the alerts. And it does amongst the accusations raise the throwback of "I told
you so" if something actually happened. But none of that has stopped the fear
mongering including at least one pundit we listened to on National TV declare
that a terrorist attack will happen prior to the November 2004 election.
But certainly one can not deny the fear that this generates. As we note in
our title "Booga, Booga". While specific obvious targets were cited such as
the Federal Reserve, the NYSE, the IMF and World Bank in fact an attack could
in theory come just about anywhere. So this results in closed roads, blocked
access to buildings, car searches, holding people, and riot clad police everywhere.
Security though is not cheap. And all of the cost no matter whether it is supplied
by government employees (police, army) or private guards all come at a cost
to the public purse either from the Federal Government or the States.
With a budget deficit already approaching a half a trillion dollars and many
states remaining in constant deficit, the cost of the war in Iraq, the maintenance
of US military presence in more than 130 countries and the growing cost of
domestic security are becoming astronomical. All of this is taking place against
the backdrop of ongoing cries to cut government but what is suffering and being
cut is education, health, environment etc. while military and security grow
in leaps and bounds. US global military expenditures are already almost larger
than everyone else combined.
And there is a cost to the massive deficits as upwards of half of US public
debt is now in the hands of foreigners primarily China and Japan. While the
US Treasury Department does not see this as a problem it should be viewed with
higher alarm, as effectively the US is dependent upon the largesse of other
countries to finance their ongoing military adventures that are contributing
to the budgetary deficits as well as the trade deficits as a result of massive
imports. The question is will the foreign holders of debt continue to be "buy
and hold" investors? At the rate we are going is foreigners holding even higher
levels of US debt possible? What does it mean for US Foreign Policy if foreigners
are providing the financing for military adventures?
And none of this takes into account the non-financial ramifications of an
ongoing assault on guaranteed constitutional freedoms such as speech, assembly,
association etc. The recent Democratic Convention was a case in point where
the "free speech" zone was under a freeway under construction, in a pen that
could only hold 1000 people with one entrance, surrounded by barbwire and riot
clad police. In parts of America today even legitimate dissent can now be considered
terrorism.
Why do we mention all of this and what does it mean for the financial markets?
Well all of this casts a pall over the markets. And this despite the constant
cry to "don't worry", "go about your business". And the business of America
is to shop. But if the local Mall might be a terrorist target why would you
want to go to the Mall? The most recent retail sales numbers were much lower
than expected and 2nd quarter GDP was also lower than expected.
But in keeping with the mixed nature of recent economic numbers others have
been on expectations or better and consumer confidence surprisingly remains
firm. That may be soon changing.
So just how has the stock market acted when Orange Alert was in effect? We
took a look at it and summarize the following on the S&P 500.
| Orange Alert |
S&P 500 |
| September 10-24, 2002 |
Down 83.6 points or 9.2% |
| February 7-27, 2003 |
Down 0.85 points or 0.1% |
| March 17-April 16, 2003 |
Up 46.65 points or 5.6% |
| May 20-30, 2003 |
Up 42.85 points or 4.6% |
| December 21, 2003 - January 9, 2004 |
Up 33.2 points or 3% |
| August 1, 2004 - |
Down 37.8 points thus far or 3.4% |
The mixed record on Orange Alert to date tells us that the issuance of the
alert may not be all that meaningful but it certainly cannot be ignored. The
current drop in the market is due as much to the recent rise in oil prices
as anything else. Oil prices have been spurred by the Yukos affair and by the
ongoing attacks in Iraq. Adding fuel to the fire was the non-farm payroll numbers
that came out on August 6. The sharply lower numbers coupled with the downward
revisions of earlier months is a very serious slap in the face to the White
House Administration and even more so to the market that has been lulled into
believing the economy was improving. But it had for months been the sense that
there was something wrong with the employment numbers as the overall sense
was that while the numbers looked good it did not match the reality being seen
and heard out on Main Street.
With a mixed record for the market on orange alerts the focus maybe should
be on who benefits from an Orange Alert and heightened security. Companies
that may benefit from the increased security and policing are security firms,
equipment suppliers to police and firms specializing in gadgetry for security
such as biometrics. Here we find that over time a number of firms have definitely
benefited. Some that come to mind are Armor Holdings Inc. (AH-NYSE) up 32%
YTD, DHB Industries Inc. (DHB-NYSE) up 112% YTD, Mine Safety Appliances (MSA-NYSE)
up 38% YTD, Lakeland Industries Inc. (LAKE-NASDAQ) up 15% YTD and Taser International
(TASR-NASDAQ) down 2.3% YTD although at one point it was up 332% so it is extremely
volatile and now has problems because of the deaths of a number of people after
being subdued by a Taser baton.
While these firms (and others) have done exceptionally well in the era of
heightened security watching their sales grow immensely and their stock price
soar there is one company above all others that has benefited not so much from
the heightened homeland security but overall because of the war on terror and
the invasion of Iraq. That company is Halliburton Co. (HAL-NYSE). This is the
company that was headed during the 1990's by now Vice President Dick Cheney.
VP Cheney has been one of the prime architects behind the invasion of Iraq
even before September 11, 2001. VP Cheney has repeatedly defended the invasion
of Iraq and the reasons for the invasion of WMD and al Qaeda connections even
as they have been proven to be false. VP Cheney has defended the torture of
prisoners at Abu Ghraib, that the treatment of prisoners under the Geneva Convention
was no longer applicable, and that prisoners at Guantanamo Bay even if they
were put on trial, which they haven't yet nor have they been charged, but if
some day they were on trial and found innocent they still may not be released.
We point this out because of the stamp of Halliburton is all through the oil
regions of Central Asia and the Middle East during the 1990's. But Halliburton
is now under criminal investigation for activities during the Cheney years
of bribery charges and misappropriation of funds. Reports have surfaced largely
in international news sources of "misuse of corporate funds", "corruption of
foreign agents" and Cheney's "alleged complicity in the abuse of corporate
assets" (Sydney Morning Herald, London Times and Le Figaro). Halliburton is
also under investigation by the SEC for similar activities.
Cheney has been under investigation in Congress as well for his deferred compensation
packages, unexercised stock options and continuing financing from Halliburton.
Halliburton has been awarded more then $2 billion in contracts in Iraq including
one worth $1.2 billion on a non-competitive basis. The continuing financial
interests and options may be in defiance of federal ethics laws. There have
also been findings that Halliburton inflated fuel prices and phantom shipments
that have bilked the US Taxpayer for millions. Halliburton has also been heavily
behind the hiring of private security firms to provide armed security in Iraq.
This is also charged to the US Taxpayer at a far higher cost then regular army.
Despite all the largesse directed at Halliburton the stock remains well off
its highs seen in 1997. As well throughout 2004 Halliburton has been caught
in a drifting trading range as the allegations against the company mount. We
suspect that like the broader market Halliburton is about to fall sharply.
Halliburton appears to be forming a symmetrical triangle and appears to have
penetrated the lower end on the close Friday August 6. Despite that we remain
above the 40-week MA so major support lies just below. The real danger will
get underway if that level breaks from the probable topping pattern.
For several months now the market has been in a major drift. This drift is
similar to what was seen through the summer of 2000 and again in late 2001
and the early part of 2002 following the rally that followed the 9/11 attacks.
Investors should take heed because what followed was effectively a long hard
crash. And now not only do investors have to deal with a far less than robust
economy that never was, sharply rising oil prices that are clearly negative
for the economy, an over indebted consumer, increased insurgency and revolts
in Iraq, threats against Iran, ongoing destruction in Gaza but as well Orange
Alerts and the real threat of a terrorist attack going into the November elections.
Booga, Booga.
|