|
The dour, hapless and colourless President of the European Central Bank, Wim
Duisenberg, finally announced this week that he would be retiring from his
position on July 9, 2005, three years before the end of his term. The battle
to succeed him is expected to be an increasingly open and probably bitter one
in the coming months. The French are expected to assert their droit de seigneur
to the position by nominating Banque de France Governor Jean Claude Trichet,
or whichever enarque emerges from their secretive internal processes.
Political horse trading along national lines and a case of 'Buggins turn'
are likely to determine the process, rather than the interests of the institution
and the 300 million consumers and producers who will have to live with its
decisions. The institution's uncertain stature will not be enhanced.
Duisenberg, a Dutchman, the first President of the European Central Bank took
the position in 1998 prior to the introduction of the Euro as a virtual currency
in January 1999. His election was allegedly part of a Franco-German backroom
deal whereby the ECB would be located in Frankfurt and the French would get
the presidency, but only after a decent interval in order to make the stitch-up
not too obvious. The Germans, who wanted the ECB to be a clone of their revered
Bundesbank, saw Duisenberg as the closest thing they could get to a German
without having the passport and someone who could build a reputation for the
ECB in the markets. (He has built the reputation; unfortunately, it is the
wrong one.)
The eighteen months period before the position becomes available is convenient
for the French. M. Trichet is under investigation for his involvement in the
scandals that rocked Credit Lyonnais in the early 1990s where he was a Senior
Director. The period will give him time to clear his name. It would not be
acceptable to have an incoming President with a cloud over his name as to his
honestly and probity. In the event Trichet fails to make the grade the French
will have a number of identikit candidates with a grande ecole education and
experience in the French bureaucracy, including Jean Lemieux, the current President
of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
The French vice president of the ECB, Christian Noyer, will conveniently step
down from the ECB Board in May 2002 and could therefore be another candidate
should Trichet fail to make the grade. (The President and Vice President cannot
be of the same nationality and the Vice President cannot be directly appointed
to the Presidency.)
Franco-German relations may not be what they were but it is unlikely that
the Germans will in the end not honour whatever understanding they had with
the French. However, the other ten members of the ECB are unlikely to accept
this axis without at least a symbolic fight. Candidates of other nationalities
will undoubtedly emerge. They include the Finnish< Spanish and Italian board
members. Intriguingly, Eddie George, Governor of the Bank of England would
be available since he retires from the Old Lady on 1 July 2003.
But the undoubted infighting that lies ahead belies the greater question:
what does the ECB need to establish its credibility in the markets. It is seen,
fairly or unfairly, as an inflexible, undemocratic and unaccountable body that
has presided over a decline in the Euro's exchange rate of almost 30 percent
since the Euro was floated in January 1999. It is an unwieldy, inward looking,
bureaucratic institution that is perpetually behind the curve in its policy
responses.
Whilst it urgently needs to trim down and become more nimble, the internal
contradictions about its mission make long term success unlikely. Whilst it
enjoys autonomy on monetary affairs, the member states are unlikely to yield
sufficient fiscal powers to Brussels to bring in common fiscal policies and
make the Euro a success. Absent these fiscal balancing measures and flexible
work practices and labour mobility, the one-size-fits-all interest rate policy
is bound to create inflationary pressures in some parts of the union and deflationary
pressures elsewhere. The Eurozone does not at this time classify as an optimal
currency area. The entry of the Eastern European states will only distort this
further and make the job of the ECB harder.
The Latin Monetary Union lasted 41 years from 1873 to 1914. Bretton Woods
lasted twenty-five years from 1946 to 1971. The ECB and the Euro will be lucky
to last as long.
Market implications
The Euro is, for good reasons, the Rodney Dangerfield of major currencies:
'it just don't get no respect'. Capital flight from Europe to North America
has been massive in recent years accounting for much of the currency's weakness
in the foreign exchange markets. But with the US dollar being managed like
the Argentine Peso what about the future?
Well, every dog has its day and a broken clock tells the correct time twice
in every 24 hours. We expect the USD to peak finally in the coming weeks as
faith in the markets weakens and the economic recovery is weaker than the happy-clappy
cheer leading consensus hopes. So long as the Euro can hold above its 2000
low of US 0.82 we would expect it to recover slowly during the course of 2002
and perhaps eventually reach close to a dollar.
However, the real story of 2002 may be the growing loss of faith in currencies
generally. We see this in Japan currently where the populace frightened by
the withdrawal of deposit insurance on bank deposits on 1 April is turning
to holding gold in a major way.
Gold is after all the financial sector's equivalent of the miners' canary
in the cage. It can produce a signal about the health - or lack thereof - of
the system. It is the only asset that is no-ones liability. It has stood the
test of time and, indeed, has performed credibly against all currencies except
the USD in the last few years.
If Far Eastern buying continues after Chinese New Year then there
could be a slow turn towards gold globally. After all, the gold mining sector
was the best performing sector in 2001 and the sector is capitalised at less
than USD 50 billion, less than many busted high tech US companies.
A small reallocation of global assets to this undervalued sector would have
an explosive impact on valuations. We remain very positive medium term although
there will be short-term profit taking. We maintain our position that, in these
difficult times, most investors should have some exposure to this sector, at
the very least as portfolio insurance.
|