|
Just as all political careers are supposed to end in failure, all bubbles burst
and the hangovers are usually far worse than the party that pre-ceded them.
A few months ago in the wake of Enron and Argentina's collapse we asked who
would be next. The answer has come weekly: Dynergy, Merrill Lynch, Global Crossing,
Tyco, ImClone, Martha Stewart, WorldCom, Arthur Andersen and Xerox, it's been
the bum of the week to be dragged off in handcuffs, arraigned before the authorities
to personal and corporate disgrace.
No one should be surprised by these developments. The extent and the longevity
of the bubble led to an all-round lowering of standards and conflicts of interest.
Indeed, the system became conflicted from top to bottom, analysts, auditors,
the press, the government and the regulatory authorities, and corporate executives
all conspired, wittingly or unwittingly, to loot the system to the detriment
of the shareholders. There is an almost historical inevitability to the process
as excessive greed enveloped the system in a manner that had not occurred since
the roaring twenties.
As the process continues its inexorable unwinding there will be an equally
inevitable political reaction against the corporate greed as shareholders face
reduced financial futures and constrained pensions. That was the case in the
two previous financial excesses in the twentieth century. Both followed abnormally
long expansionary periods.
The first followed the Civil War and the dis-inflationary impact of the opening
of the prairies and the early industrialisation of the United States and the
rise of the robber barons. After the crash of 1908, the same robber barons
were roped in with anti-trust laws and the Federal Reserve System created.
The second was the expansion of the 1920s in the aftermath of World War I.
Crazy speculation, driven by dreams that new technology would revolutionise
society, coupled with an over-expansionary monetary policy led to the 1929
crash, The policy reaction to the resulting policy-induced economic depression
was the creation of the panoply of regulatory agencies, including the Securities
and Exchange Commission, that increasingly dominated the American economy from
1940-1980.
Regulation followed regulation until by the 1970s the US economy was strangulated
into a low growth stagflationary morass that was only relieved by the deregulatory
and tax cutting actions of the Reagan Administration that liberalised and re-energised
the markets. Thus the long boom was created. For the first eight years the
process was rationale and hugely beneficial. Normally, the expansion would
have been self-correcting, but the end of the Cold War threw further fuel on
the expansion by its impetus to globalisation, which sharply reduced defence
expenditures.
Unfortunately, politics in the form of the Clinton Administration's monetary
and electoral policies gave further boosts to the system after the Mexican,
Russian, LTCM and Y2K bailouts, introduced moral hazard into the system - the
Greenspan put - and fostered the dangerous illusion that 'this time it is really
different'. The Clinton Administration, driven by the 1996 and 2000 elections,
desperately wanted the party to continue long after it should have cooled off.
They succeeded, leaving the Bush Administration to pick up the pieces.
The Bush Administration instead of preparing the public for the long haul
ahead, and blaming its predecessor for the excesses, dithered. As a result,
it is in danger of being blamed for the mess than continues to expose itself
on a weekly basis. As we have stated before, the situation increasingly resembles
that of Japan a decade before.
Disregarding interim rallies, the process has further to run, perhaps much
further, both in time and distance. By traditional measures, the stock market
is still over valued by 30-50 percent. George Soros says the dollar is overvalued
by about 30 percent and the dollar this week reached virtual parity with the
Euro for the first time in almost three years.
In addition, there is a huge property bubble that can be expected to burst
sooner or later, most likely when interest rates begin to rise. If they do
not rise soon - and the Fed may feel the need to continue holding them down
- then they are stoking up even greater problems for the future.
There is one further less generally recognised danger: that of a derivative
scandal. Given all the problems that bread and butter accounting have hidden,
it seems only a matter of time before there are scandals in the esoteric, non-transparent
and inadequately understood area of derivatives. Such a scandal would have
more fundamental systemic dangers to the financial system compared to the mere
overstatement of earnings of some third-rate industrial company.
The public seems to have been philosophical about all the financial shenanigans
till now but, as the process continues, are likely to become increasingly discomfited
and lash out in a populist upsurge at the political incumbents, regardless
whether they are really to blame or not. The Democrats could well get control
of both Houses of Congress in November. They, in turn, can be expected to reinforce
the tendencies that have been in place since 11 September: a new regulatory
upsurge - some undoubtedly justified but likely to go to excess - greater protectionist
policies, following the recent of steel tariffs and new agricultural subsidies,
and greater government spending. These are recipes for increased inflation,
interest rates and ex-growth stock markets.
Whatever happens, the much vaunted and over-hyped American model seems likely
to face its greatest stress in a couple of decades and perhaps its greatest
test since the thirties. On the eve of the fifth anniversary of the Asian crisis,
the much ridiculed crony capitalists there are grinning in their Johnny Walker
Blue Label.
Investment implications
Our opinions remain unchanged. The fundamentals argue that the US market and
the dollar remain substantially overvalued.
Whilst the markets may have reached a temporary point of exhaustion this week,
confidence is fast leaking away from both the stock market and the dollar.
As frequently expected here, the dollar index has broken important support
at 110 and projects on the charts down to 95 and 80, the level from which its
bull markets began in 1995. The Euro presently $0.99 projects to $1.10 and
$ 1.20 and just possibly $ 1.40.
The US stock market, as measured by the S&P 500, projects on the charts
to 350 should 950 be broken! Incredible as that may seem, that would indicate
a multi-year decline comparable to the decline seen in Japan since 1990.
This promises to be a very difficult environment for investors. But the decline
of the dollar may well induce fund flows into the Asian markets that have been
through five years wringing their excesses out. A little money goes a long
way there. The so-called Mango markets of Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines,
for instance, have a combined market capitalisation of less than USD 100 billion,
a fraction of many fallen angels before their denouement. Commodities,
including gold and silver, as we have mentioned many times before, have been
starved of investment for twenty years and should also benefit.
|