|
Although I cannot be sure exactly where, I'm certain I read somewhere a famous
quote that's attributable to one of the swashbuckling pirates [either Blackbeard
or Greenbeard, perhaps?] of yore, namely, that "your word is your bond." In
this case the quote evokes connotations of there being honor among thieves,
if you will, in that cads who earn a living through illicit means generally
tend to stick together when the going gets tough cause after all - it's a brotherhood.
Way back in yesteryear, some of these notorious pilfering cads used to take
refuge in the largely uninhabited and virtually lawless Isles of the Caribbean.
Apart from the obvious benefits of offering a warm climate and convenient place
to hide and store booty, they offered any would be pirate the added convenience
of proximity to world shipping lanes - or a steady and growing supply of unwitting
victims. But suffice to say, that historically, the Caribbean has served as
a convenient and preferred place for some of the worlds most illustrious and
celebrated criminals and profiteers to both base their operations and/or hide
their illicit gains harvested from their adventurism on the high seas.
There is branch, or discipline, within modern economics that encompasses a
somewhat artful [even if it is a little dodgy] discipline known as technical
analysis. At its core, this discipline involves careful study and measure of
events that have occurred in the past and utilizing historic recurring patterns
of how events unfolded to predict how events [economic occurrences] might unfold
in the future. Followers, or believers, of the predictive powers of technical
analysis are generally devout in their belief that history tends to repeat
itself. As such, if this is true, I would argue mankind is subject or condemned
to repeat reprehensible conduct, be it profligacy or outright currency debasing
fraud and theft by officialdom since history is replete with examples of the
same.
Speaking of "your word being your bond" generally and bonds, specifically
- I decided to take a look at yesterday's TIC numbers published jointly by
the US Treasury and Federal Reserve.
MAJOR FOREIGN HOLDERS OF TREASURY SECURITIES
(in billions of dollars)
HOLDINGS 1 / AT END OF PERIOD |
| COUNTRY |
2005
Jan |
2004
Dec |
2004
Nov |
2004
Oct |
2004
Sept |
2004
Aug |
2004
July |
2004
June |
2004
May |
2004
April |
2004
Mar |
2004
Feb |
2004
Jan |
| Japan |
701.6 |
711.8 |
714.9 |
714.2 |
719.2 |
721.3 |
697.2 |
689.0 |
667.0 |
652.4 |
645.9 |
613.8 |
583.2 |
| Mainland China |
194.5 |
193.8 |
191.1 |
185.7 |
180.4 |
172.6 |
167.4 |
165.2 |
164.4 |
162.5 |
157.3 |
153.7 |
156.2 |
| United Kingdom |
163.0 |
163.7 |
152.5 |
135.6 |
129.4 |
129.4 |
124.9 |
121.1 |
114.8 |
115.5 |
100.8 |
94.8 |
91.8 |
| Caribbean Banks 2/ |
92.5 |
69.5 |
77.4 |
98.5 |
100.5 |
96.5 |
95.4 |
100.1 |
76.4 |
60.8 |
62.3 |
51.8 |
48.1 |
| Korea |
67.7 |
69.0 |
69.3 |
63.7 |
64.5 |
61.4 |
59.4 |
58.76 |
57.0 |
57.6 |
58.9 |
57.1 |
59.6 |
| OPEC |
64.7 |
59.8 |
60.6 |
59.7 |
55.0 |
49.3 |
54.6 |
51.5 |
45.6 |
44.9 |
43.0 |
41.1 |
43.4 |
| Taiwan |
59.2 |
58.8 |
58.1 |
57.6 |
57.5 |
56.4 |
57.7 |
58.0 |
57.3 |
56.8 |
54.9 |
55.8 |
53.1 |
| Germany |
57.1 |
53.6 |
55.9 |
52.5 |
51.3 |
48.5 |
49.1 |
47.9 |
49.9 |
50.2 |
45.9 |
46.0 |
47.5 |
| Hong Kong |
59.2 |
52.7 |
50.0 |
50.9 |
50.6 |
50.4 |
51.5 |
53.4 |
53.4 |
53.4 |
51.8 |
53.8 |
54.8 |
| Switzerland |
50.0 |
51.1 |
51.0 |
51.4 |
49.1 |
49.5 |
48.6 |
50.2 |
49.3 |
51.1 |
48.6 |
48.3 |
45.1 |
| Canada |
43.4 |
41.2 |
40.2 |
34.5 |
34.1 |
33.6 |
33.8 |
31.1 |
33.5 |
33.7 |
31.0 |
28.5 |
26.2 |
| Mexico |
41.1 |
40.3 |
41.0 |
40.7 |
41.6 |
43.5 |
42.2 |
45.9 |
36.5 |
30.6 |
28.9 |
28.4 |
27.5 |
| Luxembourg |
29.3 |
29.0 |
28.0 |
27.9 |
27.2 |
27.2 |
27.1 |
27.2 |
25.6 |
26.3 |
27.8 |
27.7 |
26.1 |
| Singapore |
27.6 |
28.0 |
28.1 |
26.1 |
23.8 |
28.9 |
26.0 |
27.0 |
26.2 |
27.1 |
26.7 |
25.8 |
23.2 |
| Ireland |
21.0 |
21.7 |
22.5 |
20.7 |
20.1 |
21.1 |
20.3 |
17.9 |
19.7 |
14.9 |
14.6 |
16.0 |
14.8 |
| Belgium |
16.5 |
16.7 |
16.5 |
15.7 |
15.6 |
15.5 |
15.7 |
16.1 |
13.6 |
13.2 |
12.8 |
12.6 |
14.6 |
| Israel |
16.0 |
14.7 |
14.3 |
11.7 |
13.6 |
12.3 |
13.8 |
18.1 |
18.0 |
15.5 |
16.4 |
14.1 |
10.5 |
| Thailand |
15.8 |
15.0 |
15.4 |
14.6 |
13.6 |
14.7 |
13.8 |
11.4 |
10.9 |
10.7 |
11.9 |
15.3 |
13.5 |
| Italy |
14.9 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
14.2 |
14.4 |
14.3 |
15.2 |
15.5 |
15.6 |
15.3 |
14.6 |
13.0 |
14.7 |
| India |
13.9 |
12.9 |
13.5 |
13.9 |
12.8 |
14.2 |
15.2 |
16.1 |
16.1 |
16.2 |
13.8 |
13.5 |
15.7 |
| Turkey |
12.8 |
11.9 |
14.4 |
16.0 |
16.8 |
16.4 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
15.7 |
16.3 |
14.9 |
14.2 |
14.5 |
| Spain |
12.2 |
11.8 |
11.8 |
8.9 |
9.6 |
9.0 |
10.1 |
10.4 |
10.0 |
11.0 |
9.3 |
9.6 |
10.8 |
| Brazil |
12.2 |
13.4 |
13.6 |
13.9 |
14.6 |
15.1 |
15.0 |
12.1 |
12.1 |
12.2 |
13.1 |
11.3 |
10.7 |
| Sweden |
11.6 |
12.8 |
11.8 |
11.5 |
10.5 |
10.3 |
9.6 |
9.9 |
11.3 |
9.7 |
10.3 |
10.5 |
9.6 |
| Australia |
9.7 |
10.5 |
8.8 |
7.1 |
6.7 |
7.0 |
7.8 |
7.3 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
10.2 |
12.7 |
10.8 |
| France |
9.2 |
8.0 |
7.5 |
7.8 |
10.1 |
10.1 |
11.8 |
11.1 |
11.0 |
12.2 |
16.4 |
12.2 |
16.0 |
| Netherlands |
8.7 |
9.7 |
8.2 |
8.5 |
9.8 |
7.1 |
14.4 |
14.4 |
13.4 |
15.2 |
12.2 |
12.4 |
13.2 |
| All Other |
141.3 |
139.8 |
142.2 |
136.8 |
126.7 |
120.3 |
125.3 |
119.7 |
116.5 |
122.4 |
119.4 |
116.6 |
115.7 |
| Grand Totals |
1960.3 |
1935.9 |
1933.5 |
1900.4 |
1879.1 |
1855.9 |
1837.9 |
1821.2 |
1748.3 |
1715.3 |
1673.7 |
1610.6 |
1570.9 |
| |
| Of which official |
1177.9 |
1172.9 |
1177.3 |
1159.8 |
1144.1 |
1127.4 |
1109.6 |
1101.5 |
1068.7 |
1051.4 |
1034.9 |
994.9 |
967.3 |
| Bills |
242.1 |
244.6 |
256.0 |
259.5 |
259.5 |
253.7 |
251.3 |
248.9 |
232.9 |
224.8 |
231.6 |
225.6 |
214.5 |
| Bonds and Notes |
935.9 |
928.4 |
921.4 |
900.3 |
884.7 |
873.8 |
858.3 |
852.6 |
835.8 |
826.6 |
803.3 |
769.2 |
752.8 |
Department of the Treasury/Federal Reserve Board, March 15, 2005
1) Estimated foreign holdings of U.S. Treasury marketable and nonmarketable bills,
bonds and notes are based on Treasury Foreign Portfolio Investment Survey
benchmarks and on monthly data reported under the Treasury International Capital
(TIC) reporting system. 2) Includes Bahamas, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Netherlands
Antilles, and Panama. [emphasis added]
http://www.ustreas.gov/tic/mfh.txt
In doing so, one might choose to notice how America's traditional financiers
[Japan, China and Korea] have actually reduced their holdings of US debt obligations
but our new best friends, the Pirates [hedge funds?] of the Caribbean have
dramatically stood in for the debt fatigued Asians in accumulating a walloping
23 billion in additional US debt in the latest reporting month [Jan. 05]. Go
figure, ehh, who would have ever thought that pirates could or would ever be
so charitable?
Upon further examination of the red line in the table above depicting the
Caribbean banking centre and their holdings of US securities; what stands out
above all else is that this line, unlike any other jurisdiction in the world,
looks contrived, lacks continuity and its erratic fluctuations give the appearance
that this line is being used as a "plug". Actually, the term 'skullduggery'
comes to mind. It should be remembered that other jurisdictions in the world
are home to hedge funds also, yet none of them exhibit such wild fluctuations
in their monthly reporting. Strange, ehh?
You see folks, it's officialdom and their Wall Street shills themselves that
would have us believe that Caribbean based hedge funds have actually 'picked
up the slack' so to speak [if you want to call 23 billion slack], and anted
up this enormous amount of investment capital to float the American government's
profligacy pontoon boat. They also tell us that there is a shortage of "long
term" paper in the market and this has been the primary cause for long term
rates remaining so stubbornly low. Upon further examination of the detailed
TIC data supplied, compliments of the good folks at the Treasury, here:
http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/js2314.htm
We find that, indeed [and admittedly counter intuitively to me], foreigners
have been seemingly snapping up securities - massively favoring the long end
of the [interest rate] curve versus the short end. This is evidenced by this
quote on the U.S. Treasury's web site [link above]:
Net Long-Term Securities Flows
"Net foreign purchases of both domestic and foreign
long-term securities from U.S. residents were $91.5 billion in January
compared with $60.7 billion in December."
With such being the case, here is a somewhat simplistic but I would argue
accurate depiction as to what has happened to these friendly and extremely
generous Caribbean based hedge funds in the past month and a half:
*10 yr. 4.00 % cpn. gov't bond in the month of Jan. yielding 4.00 % = price
of 100.00
*Same bond in March with a yield of 4.5 % = price of 96.03 [4%
loss]
Remember folks: Hedge Funds typically employ leverage when they "invest".
10 dollars in bets for every 1 dollar in equity [shareholder's contributions]
is perhaps a conservative measure in assessing leverage employed by hedge funds
engaged in the Bond Trade. [Using LTCM as a well documented benchmark, they
used leverage of roughly 100:1 whilst plying their trade in supposedly much
riskier Russian bonds].
So using this conservative metric of 10:1, anyone can see that in the past
six weeks alone, Hedge Fund losses on their acquisition
of 23 billion in additional US debt has likely resulted in losses in the neighborhood
of 40 % of the principal allocated to acquire the position. In such
case, this would represent nothing short of mortal body blow to their capital
invested in these bonds. [Utilizing 25:1 leverage in
the same example, their equity capital would have been completely wiped out]
If such were the case, this would surely be front page news in the main stream
financial press now wouldn't it? But we all know this is not the case, since
nothing to this effect has been widely reported, or even under reported in
our responsible main stream financial press.
In fact, the only story relating to hedge funds to receive any press whatsoever,
in the past six weeks has been from relatively obscure KL Financial, based
in Florida.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp19117.pdf
It has been reported that one of KL's founders and head trader, John Kim's
aggressive trading led to the KL's demise - no mention of bonds. KL's various
troubled funds [rumored to be 200 - 300 million in aggregate] that regulators
have swooped in on seizing and freezing are all mainland U.S. based and have
nothing to do, whatsoever, with the Caribbean? So what else could it be?
How about the Carry Trade? In the carry trade, hedge funds would naturally
buy the long end of the curve and fund at the short end. With the yield curve
flattening as much as it has, the effects of such a strategy would have been
doubly disastrous.
The foregoing suggests that hedge funds categorically did not buy these securities.
The explanations being offered up as plausible by officialdom and fed to us
by the main steam financial press are not consistent with empirical facts or
market observations. There are no wide spread or significant losses being reported
by the hedge fund community from ill gotten losses in the Treasury market.
The answer to the question posed above, dear reader, rests with one determining
who else in the world has pockets that deep, to buy 23 billion bucks worth
of securities in a single month? One might surmise that a printing press would
be required to come up with that kind of cash on such short notice, ehhh? Observing
my surroundings, I can see rapidly rising prices for virtually everything.
Look at the CRB index. Look at the price of oil. Look at the price of houses.
Look at the sorry state of the dollar and listen to its biggest holders complain
that they are holding too many of them? Weigh all of this against the claims
from officialdom that inflation is not a concern - citing doctored CPI, PPI
and an anemic gold price level long suspected of being rigged. Once again,
the numbers being reported by officialdom are quite simply inconsistent with
empirical realities. This is all highly suggestive that someone, somewhere,
is working overtime creating [printing perhaps?] a little, no - a lot, of extra
ca$h. Who would or possibly could do such a thing?
While I do not put too much faith in technical analysis, my suggestion to
you, dear reader, is that history is indeed repeating itself and maybe Pirates
still inhabit the Caribbean. Perhaps they are aided and abetted in their modern
day financial piracy by Wizards and Snowmen, with printing presses, who reside
in Washington? Could it be that the booty they have confiscated from us all
is nothing more than the diluted purchasing power of the currency we all work
for? If so, true to form - like the days of yore, these cads are sworn to secrecy
as they pillage and harvest our wealth for their own self serving, grand illusion,
fiat preserving ends.
From where I sit, it all looks like pilfering pirates profiteering, pushing
phony paper, purposely positioning people - portending a perilous plunge from
the proverbial plank.

Image courtesy of
http://subvertise.org/
|