|
In an April 28, 2005 news release, GFMS announced that the year-end price
of gold could reach a 22 year high of US$500. With the price of precious metals
in a trading range and mining stocks experiencing double digit declines this
announcement comes as a surprise to many gold bugs and analysts. It is particularly
noteworthy, since GFMS is notoriously conservative when it comes to predicting
future gold price trends.
Of even greater significance are the two main reasons behind GFMS's position.
First, GFMS states first that growing US deficits, a weakening US dollar and
the prospect of a marked US economic slowdown will push up the market value
of gold bullion this year and next. Ally that with an event driven rally in
the oil price then gold heading for the $500 mark no longer looks fanciful.
Second, the downside for the gold price is negligible. This is because of a "robust
demand" for physical bullion, and an increased willingness on the part of investors
to buy gold on price weakness.
In its Gold Survey 2005, GFMS mentions several developments that together
show an increasing interest in physical gold ownership.
- Gold coin fabrication rose 7.0 percent in 2004.
- Bar hoarding rose a whopping 38 percent in 2004.
- Producer de-hedging rose to record levels of just over 440 tonnes in 2004.
- Gold mine production fell by 5 percent.
- Net official sector sales dropped 23 percent to a five-year low.
- Scrap gold supply fell to a three-year low of just 828 tonnes.
Based on my own research, which dates back to 1997, I concluded that precious
metals were about to begin a new bull market that would likely last for decades
and surpass the previous bull market of the 1970s. This conclusion was based
primarily on the growing money supply in most western economies, but especially
in the US, as well as the unsustainable mountain of debt at every level.
In three recent presentations to the US congress Chairman Greenspan warned
that the great American growth machine may be in trouble and admonished government
officials to reduce today's massive spending and trade deficits, or face a
marked slowdown in economic growth.
Previously, Greenspan's warnings have included the many other vulnerabilities
looming over the US economy, such as derivatives, Fannie Mae, Social Security,
Medicare, consumer credit, consumer savings, energy costs, and costs incurred
by the ongoing conflict in Iraq.
Others, such as former Fed Chairman Paul Volker, Congressman Ron Paul and
Stephen Roach have issued similar warnings:
"I think we are skating on increasingly thin ice. On the present trajectory,
the deficits and imbalances will increase. At some point, the sense of confidence
in capital markets that today so benignly supports the flow of funds to the
United States and the growing world economy could fade. Then some event, or
combination of events, could come along to disturb markets, with damaging volatility
in both exchange markets and interest rates. We had a taste of that in the
stagflation of the 1970s -- a volatile and depressed dollar, inflationary pressures,
a sudden increase in interest rates and a couple of big recessions."
Paul Volker
Congressman Ron Paul recently warned:
"The economic situation today is reminiscent of the 1970s. The economic
malaise of that era resulted from the profligacy of the 1960s, when Congress
wildly expanded the welfare state and fought an expensive war in south
east Asia. Large federal deficits led to stagflation-- a combination of
high price inflation, high interest rates, high unemployment, and stagnant
economic growth. I fear that today's economic fundamentals are worse than
the 1970s: federal deficits are higher, the supply of fiat dollars is much
greater, and personal savings rates are much lower. If the federal government
won't stop spending, borrowing, printing, and taxing, we may find ourselves
in far worse shape than 30 years ago."
Morgan Stanley Chief Economist and Director of Global Economic Analysis, Stephen
Roach, paints an equally dismal picture of future American economic growth.
In a recent article entitled Trapped, Roach calls what some politicians refer
to as another economic "soft patch" a very real "ongoing post-bubble shakeout
of the U.S. economy."
Roach believes that overly generous fiscal and monetary policy has left the
US economy without effective and sufficient policy stimulus. Highly accommodative
interest rate and tax refund policies over the past few years have depleted
the government's ability to prod the economy into higher, sustained productivity.
Roach says:
"It was a great ride on the US growth front for a while. But post-bubble
excesses have only been compounded during this cyclical respite. An unprecedented
drawdown of saving and an ominous build-up of debt, in conjunction with
a lasting shortfall of organic income generation [employment and wage growth],
solidified the emergence of the Asset Economy. If the US economy were truly
healthy, the Fed should target the federal funds rate in the 5% to 5.5%
zone. However, with America's cyclical impetus fading, post-bubble fault
lines could deepen - making it all but impossible for the Fed to normalize
real interest rates. Under those circumstances, this week could mark the
Fed's last rate hike of this cycle."
US financial markets have not yet fully accounted for this highly possible
prospect of economic stagnation. If Roach's observations are correct, this
situation will put corporate growth and earnings expectations at risk and cause
stock markets to fall. Another equity market rout would cripple US economic
growth for years and cause chaos in investment markets worldwide. This is bad
news for stock investors.
However, it is good news for precious metals. As history is fond of reminding
us, gold prices tend to rise as economic growth declines. This occurs because
people purchase more gold bullion to help protect purchasing power as other
assets and asset classes decline in value.
As the world's reserve currency continues its decline other nations will be
forced to take measures to reduce their currencies against the US dollar in
order to maintain export competitiveness. Eventually all paper currencies will
decline against precious metals. As the price of imported goods and services
rises, the US Federal Reserve will be forced to increase interest rates. This
will result in higher debt service costs to governments, corporations and individuals
while at the same time curtailing consumer demand. If the Fed looses control
this could easily lead to a prolonged period of stagflation.
As long as today's economic vulnerabilities continue, or become worse, the
bull market in precious metals is not over but is only in it's first phase.
As it experiences the cyclical corrections and pullbacks, typical of any bull
market, many investors, will misunderstand these corrections and sell their
holdings.
Richard Russell, editor of the Dow Theory Letters, has said that bull markets
are like a rodeo bull.
When you are in a long-term bull market it will do everything in its power
to throw you off and make you leave prematurely. The safest, easiest way to
accumulate real wealth in these conditions is to hang on until the ride is
over.
|