|
This is a response to Gold to $200, Silver $3.50 by Steve Moyer. While I think
Mr. Moyer almost hits on some important points, he has confused a lot of effects
with their causes, and I whole-heartedly disagree with his targets for the
prices of gold and silver. I will address his points one by one. I have omitted
some small and trivial parts from his comments, indicated by ellipsis. Parentheses
indicate my comments inserted into Moyer's writing.
Moyer: As soon as gold and silver prices drop, as they continue to do as we
speak, the conspiracy theories begin. Enter the court jesters, the jugglers,
the monkey grinders and the clowns with the pants that fall down (GATA and
gold bugs in general, I guess). You fellows really should take a step back
and read your own stuff. It's downright vaudevillian.
Culver: Well, gold is down from highs that it hasn't seen for many a blue
moon, but it is holding up pretty well in my opinion, especially given the
gloomy investor sentiment in the sector. Commercial short interest is a little
troubling, but has backed off slightly. Technically, the picture is mixed but
not particularly bearish for bullion, so right off I disagree with his characterization
of the gold price situation.
As far as conspiracy theories, how does Mr. Moyer explain Greenspan's testimony
before Congress in 1998 that "...central banks stand ready to lease gold in
increasing quantities should the price rise." The Gold Antitrust Action Committee
(GATA)'s rhetoric may indeed be over the top at times, but they do have facts
such as the just mentioned Greenspan testimony to back up their allegations.
Anybody who hasn't made up their mind one way or the other should check out
GATA's website, www.gata.org.
Moyer: IF "they" ... are so hell-bent on controlling the price of gold and
silver; IF ...They...are willing to use all of these underhanded and illegal
market means to shoot your precious metals investments in the foot; IF these
markets are so easily manipulated... WHY ON EARTH WOULD YOU SIT HERE TELLING
US DAY AFTER DAY THAT WE SHOULD PUT OUR HARD-EARNED MONEY INTO THESE INVESTMENTS?...
Culver: There is no telling when exactly the paper game in precious metals
will end very badly for the manipulators, when actual physical demand will
overwhelm false paper supply. But certainly the near doubling of the gold price
in the last four years proves that the manipulators' control of the market
is not absolute. Furthermore, no gold bugs I know of have said that the princes
of fiat can permanently slay the dragon of market forces. All of us must believe
that one day honest money will prevail or why would be gold bugs?
Moyer: If the conspiracy theorists would take a valium and relax for a minute,
they might learn that Robert Prechter, Jr., Steve Hochberg, Pete Kendall and
everyone else at Elliottt Wave International (E.W.I.) have been quietly, steadily
tracking the price action of the metals during the recent, lovely metals run.
Fact is, they've pretty much nailed it thus far.
Culver: Hmmmmm. I remember hearing Robert Prechter -- no doubt a brilliant
man -- on Financial Sense Newshour some time back -- I believe it was the fall
of '03-- and when asked what it would take for him to change his mind on gold
eventually breaking previous lows, he said that a sustained rise over $400
might do it. Presumably he didn't think that was in the cards. Well, it has
now been over $400 for the better part of the time from then until now. So
much for him nailing that one.
Moyer: They (E.W.I.) are calling for a significant downturn... the Elliottt
boys have been calling for the metals to take the same hit other assets will
in the coming credit contraction and liquidity crisis (gold to just over $200,
silver to $3.50 or below), which type of credit crunch/liquidity crisis deflation
is consistent with what has occurred post-investment-mania each and every time
over the past, oh, 500 years or so.
Like clockwork.
Culver: That's only part right. Looking at the most recent example of what
he is talking about, after the collapse of the margin credit induced stock
market bubble in '29 there WAS serious deflation, but since paper money was
gold backed at that time, that means the value of gold certainly increased
not decreased. Supposedly being off the gold standard will make it different
this time. Yes, I agree, but in my opinion the difference will be that while
gold gains in value, paper money will get trashed as I will explain later.
Moyer: The sluggishness in the world economy is representative of a coming,
slow-moving deflationary elephant, not hyperinflation. Money supply contraction
points to deflation.
Culver: Money supply contraction? What planet does this guy live on? From
what I know the money supply has more than doubled in the past ten years alone.
Sure, there has been some small contraction recently, but that already appears
to be turning around.
Moyer: The flattening of the bond yield curve points to recession and deflation.
The Alan Greenspan "Conundrum," as to why interest rates are not following
the Fed's 200 basis point-raised lead, points to deflation.
Culver: Not necessarily, it could simply be that the bond market is the only
one big enough to absorb the huge quantities of money that have been created
in recent years as foreign central banks have to have somewhere to put the
excess dollars they have been accumulating due to the huge trade surpluses
with the U.S.
As for "The Conundrum", quite simply the Fed has more control over the short
end than the long end of the yield curve, hence the flattening curve. This
doesn't change the fact that a bond bubble is the result of inflation, NOT
deflation; i.e, INFLATED prices equal low yields.
Moyer: Lack of pricing power for producers, squeezed by a rise in commodity
prices, is a symptom of deflation.
Culver: No, that is not a symptom of deflation; it is symptom of overcapacity.
This can also be attributed to inflation; that is, as the flood of liquidity
from the U.S. Fed went overseas in the form of trade deficits and investment
to take advantage of cheap labor, it led to manufacturing supply overcapacity.
Moyer: The breakdowns in the HUI and XAU anticipate metals price drops, which
would be indicative of deflation.
Culver: It could also indicate that the manipulated prices of precious metals
have simply not kept pace with the inflating costs of production combined with
the rise in the currencies of commodity countries. Gold production not being
particularly profitable at present prices can only lead to more upward pressure
and higher, not lower prices in the long run.
Moyer: Even rising oil and gas prices point to deflation, as producers and
consumers get squeezed and the economy bears the brunt of it. (Interestingly
enough, however, now even the energy markets are taking their hits as deflationary
forces show even broader signs of taking hold).
Culver: It remains to be seen whether recent reversals in commodity prices
represent them having made long-term, short-term or intermediate term tops.
I reckon they are short to medium, not long-term.
Moyer: If deflation is soon to be upon us, ... there is little to no chance
the metals will avoid taking the same hit all other asset classes will. That's
what a post-bubble shakeout does, my friends.
So sell your metals. Sell your metals stocks. Put those chips in your pocket
for the time being, then whip them out in a few years when few others have
much cash to buy much of anything. The good news is, when the time comes, those
same Elliottt boys are calling for gold and silver to go through the roof.
I'm looking forward to it.
Culver: Well, in my opinion he will be waiting all the way through one of
the most spectacular gold bull markets in history.
Perhaps Mr. Moyer should consider that those following Prechter's advice missed
a good part of the 90's stock bull market. To be fair they missed the ensuing
crash also, but...
All that being said and despite the fact that Mr. Moyer seems to confuse cause
and effect quite a bit in his piece, he nevertheless, as I mentioned before
gets near to revealing a very interesting phenomenon, i.e., the way in which
monetary inflation, which I deem to be still quite alive, actually IS spawning
deflationary pressures.
For example trade deficits fund the building of production overcapacity in
developing countries; that low cost production in turn kills pricing power
for U.S. producers and laborers; lack of pricing power combined with materials
price inflation squeezes manufacturing profit margins, and higher oil prices
pinch consumers spending power.
For in depth analysis of this phenomenon see Jim Willie's excellent work at
www.goldenjackass.com
The fact that the most aggressive reflationary effort in history has lead
to the weakest recovery in the post depression era IS powerful testimony that
Kondratieff was on to something and that we are now in the winter phase of
his proposed cycle. Nevertheless, I am not sure that things will play out completely
according to script, as being in a pure fiat money regime puts us in uncharted
waters that Kondratieff, as far as I know, did not predict.
For this reason, I would take likely Greenspan successor, Ben Bernake, at
his word and suspect that at least one more round of monetary inflation is
just around the corner. Of course I don't believe it will save the real economy
from a world of pain, but I do believe it will cause another round of asset
inflation. Only this time I believe it will be precious metals and possibly
other hard assets that will blow through the roof as the paper markets crash
and the fiat dollar standard is shocked.
Sorry Mr. Moyer, you won't be getting my gold at $200, nor my silver at $3.50.
Even if I am wrong and they somehow inexplicably end up at those prices, I'll
simply hold and wait for the new "golden age" for precious metals that even
the "Elliott Boys" are predicting.
|