|
Last week bond yields on 10 year treasuries fell to their lowest levels since
March 2004. At 3.97% it was still well above the lows of 3.11% seen in June
2003. Long-term bonds (30 years) were even closer to their lows of 2003 at
4.26% versus 4.17%. But it wasn't just US government bonds that were falling
to new yield lows, as other countries were experiencing a similar fall. Canadian
10 year bonds fell to 3.73% their lowest levels in more than 30 years. Long
Canada's were in line with US Treasuries at around 4.22%.
Elsewhere Japanese bonds that were already at ridiculous low levels for several
years fell further having one of their biggest falls in years. In Europe German
10 year bonds at 3.10% were at their lowest levels since the Bundesbank started
tracking records in 1973. Not only that they were the lowest since the time
of Bismarck in the 1880's. Short 2-year bonds at under 2% were actually lower
than short interest rates offered by the European Central Bank. Indeed everywhere
over the past several weeks bonds were falling in yield the fastest since the
Asian flu, Russian default and collapse of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM)
in 1998.
So what's going on? The Fed is raising rates yet long-term rates continue
to fall. Normally short rates and long rates rise and fall in tandem even though
there have been periods like the late 1970's and early 1980's when short rates
rose faster than long rates creating a huge inverted yield curve. Yet here
we have short rates rising even as long rates are falling continuing a narrowing
of the yield curve.
The pat answers that we see regularly are that inflation is low so there is
no need for long rates to rise; by raising short term rates it is setting the
conditions to choke off inflation so long rates are falling in response; rising
short rates are slowing the economy so long rates are falling in anticipation
of a that slowing; huge inflows from foreign central banks purchasing US Treasuries
are continuing to put downward pressure on rates; and, in a period of flat
to down stock markets long bonds offer the best return even at 4%. As to a
slowing of the economy there is some expectation that Central Banks may have
to soon cut short-term interest rates. Swedish prime rates were recently slashed
by 0.50% from 2% to 1.5%. There is speculation that others will soon follow
especially in the moribund economies of the Euro zone.
But that is their problem they all seem too pat and as a result they may not
be explaining other problems that are lurking behind the scenes. The problem
may lurk in hedge funds. There are numerous reports beginning to circulate
that hedge funds may be in trouble or more specifically hedge funds that are
very active in the credit markets (junk bonds etc.). The recent downgrades
of GM and Ford have widened credit spreads between weak credits (junk bonds
etc.) and quality credits (the highest credit quality is of course US Treasuries).
Financial regulators everywhere are stepping up their inspection and attempt
to regulate the burgeoning hedge fund market. We are seeing this not only in
the US but elsewhere as well including Hong Kong, Canada and Europe.
Over the past six years the number of global hedge funds is estimated to have
grown by at least a third while the amount of funds under management has doubled.
Hedge funds are huge traders and they are estimated to account for upwards
to a third to half the volume of trading on the London and NYSE thereby providing
huge liquidity to the markets. While the hedge fund industry is nowhere near
to rivalling the mutual fund industry in sheer dollars under management, hedge
funds are coming increasingly under scrutiny and in the news. And while hedge
funds have traditionally been an investment of choice by the very rich and
sophisticated investors the industry is increasingly taking funds from smaller
and less sophisticated investors usually through the very mutual funds and
pension funds where the small investor has his funds.
Witness the controversy surrounding Portus Investment Asset Management a large
Canadian hedge fund that was ordered to discontinue operations by the Ontario
Securities Commission. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is concerned
that they are unable to monitor and value hedge funds and that fraud and other
misconduct could occur. Problems in hedge funds typically can only be discovered
after the fact when considerable losses have occurred. We emphasize though
that it depends upon the strategy being carried out by the hedge fund and it
is not a blanket statement on all hedge funds. Many studies have shown that
properly managed hedge funds can act as a hedge for a properly managed portfolio
and therefore play an important role in investment management. Hedge funds
are by their nature uncorrelated to other asset classes such as stocks and
bonds.
Even the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) the central banks central
bank is getting into the fray. In its annual report published on June 27, 2005
the BIS noted that two major risks. One was related to the huge and widening
current account deficit in the United States that "could eventual lead to a
disorderly decline of the dollar, associated turmoil in other financial markets,
and even recession. Equally of concern, perhaps closer at hand, it could lead
to a resurgence in protectionist pressure".
But besides the BIS's concern over the US Dollar they are also very concerned
about the credit derivatives market. Credit derivatives have grown 6 fold to
$4.5 trillion since 2001. The recent downgrades of GM and Ford did shake the
credit derivatives market but according to the BIS the worst could be yet to
come. The BIS is concerned about "how the CDS and CDO markets would handle
a string of credit blow-ups or a sharp turn in the credit cycle".
Hedge funds or at least those that are involved heavily in the credit markets
typically use huge leverage in order to obtain their high returns. And the
use of leverage in the credit markets is not just the domain of the hedge funds
industry as the major international banks often have groups on their credit
and derivatives dealing desks that engage in similar strategies. Numerous hedge
fund managers are former bankers who left the dealing desks of the institutional
international banks to form their own funds and using credit supplied by the
same banks and tapping into the same customer base of the international banks
they have built their funds. As the number of hedge funds has grown concern
is growing about the knowledge and quality of the hedge fund managers.
In 1998 the collapse of the hitherto little known hedge fund Long Term Capital
Management (LTCM) almost brought the financial system. Such was the interconnection
between the financial institutions that were funding LTCM. The hedge fund managers
of LTCM were a former bond dealer from an international investment dealer and
internationally known options specialists. There were also a number of hedge
funds that wound up operations in the early part of the decade during the tech
bubble collapse.
So could a huge hedge fund collapse or a series of hedge fund collapses bring
down the financial system? In this interconnected world anything is clearly
possible. The connection between hedge funds and a rallying bond market is
possible sign of strain in the hedge fund markets. One strategy that highly
leveraged hedge funds would run is credit spreads of buying high yield junk
bonds and shorting US Treasuries. In a period of strain such as the downgrade
of GM and Ford hedge fund manager in strategies such as this are forced to
cover their positions as the spread trade goes against them. This would cause
a rally in the high quality credit markets such as government bonds and credit
spreads would widen.
As well while there may be problems in the hedge fund market Central Banks
mitigate this risk through normal open market operations by the purchase of
government securities from the banks thus providing the banking system with
the needed liquidity to deal with possible credit problems elsewhere such as
in the hedge fund industry.
The trouble is what if there was a systemic problem in the system that overwhelmed
even the central bank's ability to provide liquidity to the banking system.
Hedge funds may be allowed to go down but the same would not be said of the
banking system. But at approximately $1 trillion globally the size of the hedge
fund industry appears not to be at the size that could threaten the entire
financial system. Unfortunately that is just assets under management and through
the use of derivatives the actually size could be larger by 10 times or more.
Certainly we see this with the banks themselves where derivatives are often
3 to 4 times or more the asset base. Despite the huge notional value of derivatives,
as a credit risk they represent only a portion of the actual notional value.
The falling yields in government bonds accompanied as it is with a widening
of credit spreads between the top credits and weaker credits bears watching
carefully. The past few years has seen a huge drop in that spread so the current
widening is a concern as it could be signalling more credit problems dead ahead.
The last time that the spreads between short and long term rates was narrowing
at the current pace was not only throughout the latter part of the 1990's but
especially from 2000-2001. That period also saw a considerable widening of
credit spreads that occurred during the collapse of the tech bubble. With the
most recent breakdown it could be signalling that there are further credit
problems ahead and this a potential real risk to global stock markets. A roaring
government bond market is not necessarily all what it appears.


|