|
I couldn't help but get a sense of déjà vu all over again with
Jim Puplava's interview
of Matt Simmons this weekend, Aug. 6, 2005, on the Financial Sense News
Hour. That would be Matthew Simmons - Chairman of Simmons & Company International
and author of " Twilight
in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy." Specifically
- what got my goat, so to speak, was Matt's revelations regarding two years
of service he put in on an energy supply workshop a few years back - at the
behest of energy analysts at the CIA - whose purpose was to 'model' or predict
world oil output/supply by geographical region going forward.
Simmons reveals the methodology employed by the other 9 experts on that panel
as it related to China's future oil production. These experts had Chinese oil
production rising with demand in future years. That Chinese oil production
would increase - was simply assumed! This prompted Simmons to ask questions
like; how anyone knew for a fact that China could increase supply? And could
anyone making these claims even identify the top two or three oil fields in
China? As you might have already guessed, no one had answers to these questions.
There was no provable basis for the assumptions that China would be able to
increase oil production. This got Simmons thinking more about the bigger picture
and he wanted to know if there existed a list of, say, the top 20 largest oil
field in the world? He was astonished to learn that no such list had ever been
compiled.
This led Simmons, in 2001, to begin compiling a list of the largest oil fields
in the world. In doing so, he arbitrarily used 100,000 barrels of production
per day as a cut off point as to what large is. His study found that there
are roughly 120 oil wells in the world that meet this description and together
they constitute roughly 49% of the world's oil supply [approx. 84ish million
barrels per day]. Furthermore, the top 14 of the illustrious 120 wells that
produce more than 500,000 barrels per day constituted 20% of the world's supply
and the average age of these magnificent 14 wells was in excess of 50 years.
Then, when focusing on Middle Eastern oil producers, he found that each producing
country had somewhere between 3 and 5 major wells that accounted for approximately
90% of its production.
The fact is, contrary to much opinion, that the Arabian Peninsula has been
very heavily explored for oil using the most sophisticated technologies known
to man. At the end of the day, the Arabian Peninsula has 5 super giant oil
fields that account for 90% of current production [approx. 8 - 9 million barrels
per day] - most of which have been in production for 50 years or more. Furthermore,
60% of Saudi output [5 million or so barrels per day] comes from one field
alone - Ghawar. The fact is there have been virtually no new discoveries since
1980 that are capable of producing more 250,000 - 300,000 barrels of oil per
day.
Prior to conducting this research, Simmons had mistakenly assumed that the
Middle East was 'littered' with 'scores' of producing oil wells. The other
thing that stuck out like a sore thumb regarding these significant wells was
their age. It is a given fact that as oil wells age, their flow rates first
peak and then as their reserves are diminished or depleted, their flow rates
lessen - hence the term 'Peak Oil'. To put this into context, oil was
discovered in the 1960's in the North Sea, Alaska and Siberia [ Russia]. North
Sea production of crude peaked at 6 million barrels per day in 1999 and is
now approx 4.5 million. Alaskan oil output peaked in the 1990's at 2 million
barrels and is now approx. 900,000, and Siberia peaked at 9 million and is
currently producing about 5 million barrels per day.
Saudi oil production has historically swung between, say, 5 million barrels
per day on the natural 'let nature take its course' flow rate to about 10.5
million barrels per day utilizing technological methods such as sea water injection
- which metaphorically allows one to 'milk the cow faster.' As such, Saudi
Arabia is often referred to within OPEC as the 'swing
producer.' It should be noted and understood that utilizing these technological
methods to increase flow rates from existing wells ultimately speed up the
time frame over which the well's reserve will exhaust itself - since a cow
only has so much milk to give. Simmons generalizes the practices of increasing
flow rates as 'sweeping the cupboards bare.'
What Jim Puplava points out, is that all oil supply modeling done in the world
today is largely predicated on the notion that Saudi Arabia, currently producing
at close to full bore, has vast resources of 'cheap' oil to still be tapped
and can do so in a timely fashion as demand increases. Simmons points out the
amazing thing about these assumptions; they have been made without any supporting
data. The scenario above makes it clear just how 'wishful thinking' these rosy
assumptions are. The cheap easy flowing oil is in increasingly finite supply
and this makes the world more and more dependant on heavier, more expensive,
slower flowing / thicker grades of crude. So while oil supplies will never
run out altogether, new supply is likely to be comprised of much more expensive
oil which by its very nature will not be available at ample flow rates commensurate
with existing stocks that are quickly depleting.
As Simmons points out, pundits who are optimists make claims that over the
next 5 or so years, in response to higher prices, another 16 million barrels
per day of production will come on stream - collapsing the price of oil once
again. Simmons' views regarding Peak Oil are still not universally accepted,
to say the least. Among his detractors is none other than Michael
Economides of the University of Houston, who on a recent appearance on
CBC television claimed that - while he respects Simmons work, increases to
Saudi oil output are possible because in his words,
"I've done the numbers."
What Simmons aptly points out, dear reader, is that,
"There are no numbers to do."
As Simmons suggests, you wouldn't suppose that Mr. Economides has as a client
in his consulting practice Saudi Aramco - would you? Who to believe? Now that's
what I call a conundrum! Simmons goes on to point out that meaningful oil reserve
stats are closely guarded state secrets of Saudi Arabia - a country that has
been pumping 5 - 10 million barrels of oil per day for the past 35+ years without
any draw down on their official reserve estimates - in fact they've only increased.
The amazing thing, dear reader, until Matthew Simmons came along - no one had
ever bothered compiling and analyzing oil data in the manner in which he did
- and the world simply assumed that cheap Saudi and Middle Eastern Oil was
limitless and would last forever. This assumption had simply never been challenged
- or so we would be led to believe.
Simmons
reveals that closed Senate hearings took place in the U.S. in both 1974
and again in 1979 - where high level oil executives were subpoenaed and questioned
about the validity of what amounts to 'the crux of the Saudi peak oil debate.'
The materials garnered through subpoenaed submissions of oil execs in the
1979 hearings were apparently so full of such potentially explosive findings
- they were put under seal by the Senate committee for a period of 50 years.
In essence, by connecting a few dots we can more or less assume that the
peak oil problem was known to politicos some 35 years ago, and the whole
issue was hushed and given a big deep six.
If world demand for oil grows to say, 86 - 88 million barrels per day this
winter heating season [from its current 83 - 84] without a corresponding ramp
in supply, Simmons reckons the price of crude could spiral up in the magnitude
of 5 or 10 times.
I have gone on enough about oil, but did so because in many regards, I feel
the oil story parallels the same type of unsustainable structure we are currently
facing in the world's fiat money regime. Too much un-backed money and credit
is being produced for currency to maintain its value. Amazingly, there has
been no credible audit of
the U.S. sovereign gold reserve alleged to be largely stored at Fort Knox,
West Point and the Denver Mint - for 50 years, coincidence ehh? The bulk
of mainstream economists and media 'have always assumed' the Wizard - Easy
Al Greenspan has everything under control and the Federal Reserve is really
an inflation fighting do good organization. Great efforts are made on the
part of officialdom to marginalize folks who challenge these long held views.
Gold bugs contend that officialdom is selling gold - rigging its price to perpetuate
an unsustainable fiat money system that is doomed to fail and obscuring their
actions through obfuscation including everything from creative accounting to
fudging numbers to outright lies and deceit. The claims from officialdom center
on their proclamations that 'they too have done the numbers and everything
looks fine' - with official reports of a strong economy, low unemployment and
low levels of inflation. If the bugs are correct, officialdom has done the
number alright, and the Achilles heel in the illicit rigging game is officialdom's
bleeding stocks of physical metal required to perpetuate the game. If history
is a guide and the fiat game plays out in the same manner as the oil game,
officialdom will sweep the gold cupboard bare - right to the last bar - before
they say uncle. If this is really what is happening, by the time the game is
over, the price of gold will categorically go up geometrically. Count on it.
|