|
The Federal Reserve announced on November 10th, without explanation,
and I quote, "On March 23, 2006, the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System will cease the publication of the M-3 monetary aggregate. It
will also cease publishing the following components: large-denomination time
deposits, RPs, and Eurodollars. The Board will continue to publish institutional
money market mutual funds as a memorandum item on this release."
Why? It's simple, really. So that the Plunge Protection Team can hide
its market manipulative, equity buying activities. You see, one
of the key differences between M-2 (which it appears they will report)
and M-3, is repurchase agreements. This is perhaps the most obvious reporting
item where PPT market buying transactions show up. If they no longer report
this item, folks like us who monitor the growth of M-3 for clues as to
when the PPT is likely to buy the market, will have a harder time reporting
that fact before, or even as, the PPT buys. Investors will be left more
in the dark as to any secret rigging of the stock market. Why now?
Apparently the Federal Reserve (a key member of the Working Group, a.k.a.
Plunge Protection Team) sees a coming need to buy - or facilitate the buying
- of markets, including the equity market, incognito. Apparently,
they don't want investors knowing they are the ones doing the buying, keeping
prices up, or pushing them higher.
We have continuously demonstrated the high correlation between growth in M-3
and a rising stock market. We have also demonstrated that when M-3 either declines
or stays the same, the stock market is prone to decline. The Fed knows its
hypocritical hyperinflationary expansion of the money supply recently has been
publicized by Fed watchers, and that 12 percent annualized growth in M-3 during
a time when the Fed is raising short-term interest rates aggressively, and
jawboning a determination to stop inflation, is nothing short of illogical,
bizarre Fed behavior. The reason for the dichotomy is quite simple. The
Fed can electronically print money and hand it over to the PPT to buy this
stock market. That has to be why all the extra M-3 growth over the past several
months.
When we presented the Hindenburg Omen analysis several weeks
ago, we warned that the PPT would likely buy this market to stop the higher-than-normal
probability that the market could crash. Why did we warn that the PPT
would likely buy this market, and stop any potential crash? Because of the
M-3 numbers. We could see there was too much money being created.
We know that the way money gets into the economy is by the Fed buying securities.
Inflation is too much money (M-3) chasing goods. Well, GDP (goods and services)
is growing annually around 3.8 percent, yet M-3 was being pumped at three times
that rate of growth. The difference had to go somewhere. It did. Into markets,
and very probably equity markets.
Why all the M-3? Undoubtedly because the PPT wanted to manipulate
markets at this time for reasons that are secret to everyone but them. We are
left to speculate as to those reasons. Is the economy closer to the brink
than anyone realizes? Or, is it politically expedient to goose markets? Do
the corporatist elitists want the big payback for backing the powers that be,
and insist upon a rising market into year end? Does Greenspan have an all-encompassing,
overriding desire to ensure his legacy by seeing the Dow Industrials at an
all-time high when he retires in January? We aren't privy to the reasons
because the Master Planners do not believe in the forthright flow of information.
They believe that bad news cannot be handled by the flock, that confidence
must be boosted at all costs, even if it entails manipulating the markets.
Don't let the dead be honored, instead sneaking them into Dover at night. Don't
let the real jobless figures be released, goose them with a phony birth/death
adjustment, and so on. Now we can kiss goodbye the most important Fed statistic
computed. Do you see what is happening folks? The Unpatriotic Act steals your
civil liberties. Three young girls from Kansas cannot board an Amtrak train
to New York unless they have a government issued photo ID. Not some futuristic
sci-fi plot. Now. It is called Corporatist Fascism. Next could be freedom of
speech. Then martial law. A computer chip under your skin. Eventually, your
right to vote. Then it is all over, game set and match.
Not a peep from Congress on the massacre of M-3. Oh the figure
will be calculated. We just won't be allowed to know it anymore. Really begs
the question, once again, why? Obviously because the Master Planners
expect to have to increase the Money Supply very rapidly, to extraordinary
levels next year. Obviously because they believe they are going to
need to buy equity and bond markets aggressively next year. Do they see a catastrophe
coming that will require hyperinflation to bail the U.S. out? Maybe. Every
time we've had a tragic event of mass proportions in 2005, the equity markets
have mysteriously risen out of the blue, sharply, taking shorts to the cleaners.
London bombing, Katrina, Rita, indictment of a top administration official,
etc... Yes, the Master Planners have learned that they have the wherewithal
and the gall to buy the markets - and get away with it. They have learned that
at those times when markets are at greatest risk, when shorts have their positions
lined up, a little S&P futures index buying, a select few large cap stock
buys, a leak to the trading floor that their golden boy trader is buying is
enough to send the shorts scurrying for cover and buy the market. You
see, the PPT only needs to kick start the buying. Then the shorts buy. Then
the Hedge Funds jump on the bandwagon in search of that elusive trend - either
up or down - deciding it is going to be up, and keep the rally going. But
by the time the Hedgies are buying, the PPT is able to get out (and their Wall
Street friends who took the risk and bought with them early) at a nice profit,
the shorts are out licking their losses, and we watch a waning rally with low
upside volume, low advance/decline ratios, and a high number of New Lows -
kinda like right now.
Yes, don't let the technical analysts and Fed watchers know when the PPT is
coming in. That will spook the shorts out and the PPT needs the shorts
in. But the March 2006 M-3 announcement makes one wonder. What
in the world are they going to be up to next year, that will require hiding
the growth of money supply from the U.S. citizenry who used to own this country,
who elected this outfit? War? A big-time war? Martial law? Could it
be as simple and corporatist as merely wanting to drive equity markets higher
so weak political ratings improve? Maybe nothing to do with national security
at all? These are the types of questions every thinking man and woman needs
to ask themselves and their congressional representatives, given the Fed announcement.
Remember, the original mandate of the Fed was to ensure a stable currency.
Money. So now they aren't going to release their measure of money to the public? One
thing that can be agreed upon, based upon our technical analysis work, is that
we are sitting upon an incredibly fragile moment in the markets, one that is
in no shape to psychologically withstand a catastrophic event on its own. It
would thus appear that the Federal Reserve, in tandem with the Master Planner
Team, is taking steps to prepare for the worst, and unfortunately that requires
secrecy from the people. Secrecy about how much money is going into the economy.
Secrecy.
Where does that leave us as investors? Well for one thing, it makes it incredibly
difficult to short, or buy puts, and expect a return on your money. If every
time the market should drop, the Master Planners are going to dip into
their secret M-3 stash and buy the markets, well, shorts might as well lift
the cap up, and shove their money down the sewer riser. That is the psych-ops
objective of the Master Planners.
We developed our buy/sell signals for many reasons, but one of the key
reasons was because of the PPT. The PPT stopped a crash in April/May
2004 (the last time we had a cluster of Hindenburg Omens prior to now).
Heavy doses of M-3 were thrust upon the economy back then, and markets
were mysteriously supported before panic selling could occur. Then M-3
growth settled down to a reasonable level until recently. Again, huge M-3
growth coincident with Hindenburg Omens and deteriorating technicals. But, the
buy/sell signals did not get trapped. They turned to "buys" soon after
the PPT did their initial buying, soon after the shorts did their buying,
and the Hedgies took over to start a multiweek rising trend. Elliott
Wave analysis is more predictive in an environment without active PPT involvement.
It still works with PPT involvement, but not as predicatively. It is stuck
describing the past. Interestingly, PPT activity does not thwart EW analysis,
it simply forces a change of labeling. But Elliott's rules still apply,
labeling still follows EW principles, and the past can be mapped fully
in spite of PPT intervention. But, at least this practitioner has noted,
the predictive capacity of EW analysis is muted to some extent during interventionist
periods - which up until now have not been perpetual, but rather selected
moments, most notably whenever we reached the precipice of a significant
degree wave three down. Since especially 2003, at those moments, the PPT
- also fully aware of deteriorating technicals and the set-up for a wave
three down - intervenes. Intervention does not seem to be important
at any other time. That may be about to change given the hiding of M-3. Once
intervention completes its course, from PPT initial buying, through short-covering
buying, until final Hedge-fund buying burns the rally out, EW is usually
left with a complex corrective wave two of higher degree, or a completing
wave five up. This would seem to mean that the PPT is only effective
in postponing wave three down, not delivering mankind from it.
We remain believers in Elliott Wave analysis, and find terrific navigational
value in it. EW is wonderful for letting us know where we've been, and
where we are scheduled to go.

Our Stochastic and Purchasing Power Indicators are trained trend-finders. It
doesn't matter whether the PPT jumps in or not. These signals will identify
trend-changes that have high probability of extending in points and time. That
is why we spend so much time presenting them. They are not fooled. Maybe
for a day or two or three, but not for long. Those of you who have been
following them since we introduced them can attest. The point here is, until
these signals agree with other technical analysis studies we present,
we would be hesitant to expect the timing of an outcome painted by other
technical analysis tools to appear. When in doubt, lean on the signals
for the best guidance. And, should the signals agree and
generate "sells," be mindful we are no longer in a free market environment,
but a centrally planned one, and thus you must be aware of serious risks
of going short, as at any given time, the PPT can jump in and change
the trend. This will probably remain the case until either so catastrophic
an event occurs as to overwhelm central planning efforts - such as the
decline Russia experienced under its central planning experiment - or
until an action of Congress puts a stop to the ever-widening usurpation
of the Working Group's originally intended charge.
Why is Plunge Protection Team intervention so wrong? There are
probably fifty reasons, but I want to focus on one ironic and critical reason. PPT
intervention destroys one of the most timetested, conservative easy-to-understand
investment strategies ever devised, that is guaranteed to make money over the
long-haul for both the professional and the novice. It is Joe six pack's
chance at a nest egg for retirement. It works for people who know very little
about investing, and is fabulous for 401(k) plans. Dollar Cost Averaging. What
happens here is simple. A person sticks the same amount of money into a stock
market investment at regular intervals, no matter how high or low the market
is. There's no thinking. Just saving. If this discipline is kept up, the
reason it works is because stock prices decline from time to time. It
is the drops in prices that produce the highest returns for the overall portfolio
over the long-term. Let's examine. Suppose that in ten years, if
the PPT intervenes, the Dow Industrials rise to 20,000, however if the PPT
does not intervene, the Dow Industrials end up only at 15,000. But between
then and now, in a free markets environment, we see volatility where the DJIA
drops and rises, and drops and rises, whereas the PPT scenario has the market
going straight up. Let's see under which scenario our unsophisticated investor
does best. Assume our investor invests $5,000 per year in the market in shares
of the DIA, an exchange traded fund representing the Dow Industrials, where
one share equals a value of 1/100th the DJIA index value.
| |
No PPT Intervention |
PPT Market Manipulation |
| |
DJIA
Scenario A
Free Markets |
Annual
Purchased
# Shares DIA |
Cumulative
# Shares
Owned |
DJIA
Scenario B
Planned Markets |
Annual
Purchased
# Shares DIA |
Cumulative
# Shares
Owned |
 |
 |
 |
| 2006 |
9,200 |
|
54.34 |
|
54.34 |
|
11,000 |
|
45.45 |
|
45.45 |
|
| 2007 |
8,700 |
|
57.47 |
|
111.81 |
|
12,000 |
|
41.66 |
|
87.11 |
|
| 2008 |
7,000 |
|
71.42 |
|
184.23 |
|
13,000 |
|
38.46 |
|
125.57 |
|
| 2009 |
9,100 |
|
54.94 |
|
239.17 |
|
14,000 |
|
35.71 |
|
161.28 |
|
| 2010 |
10,800 |
|
46.29 |
|
285.46 |
|
15,000 |
|
33.33 |
|
194.61 |
|
| 2011 |
12,100 |
|
41.32 |
|
326.78 |
|
16,000 |
|
31.25 |
|
225.86 |
|
| 2012 |
11,500 |
|
43.47 |
|
370.25 |
|
17,000 |
|
29.41 |
|
255.27 |
|
| 2013 |
12,800 |
|
39.06 |
|
409.31 |
|
18,000 |
|
27.77 |
|
283.04 |
|
| 2014 |
13,900 |
|
35.97 |
|
445.28 |
|
19,000 |
|
26.31 |
|
309.31 |
|
| 2015 |
15,000 |
|
33.33 |
|
478.61 |
|
20,000 |
|
25.00 |
|
334.31 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
Total Value: $71,791
(478.61 shares x $150/sh) |
Total Value: $66,862
(334.31 shares x $200/sh) |
 |
 |
 |
Even if under free markets, the Dow Industrials climbs only 63 percent over
ten years, while the manipulated market climbs 100 percent, our unsophisticated
investor comes out ahead under free markets. He gained his greatest return
power from the periods of time the market dipped. Further, if under
free markets, the DJIA caught up with manipulated markets by year 15, and both
were at DJIA 25,000, the above shares in his/her portfolio would have grown
to a value of $119,656 under free markets versus $83,577 under manipulated
markets. The point is, from the investor's perspective, stock market declines
are a good thing, creating buying opportunities that have a huge impact on
long-term returns. Problem is, the Master Planners are not looking out
for the investor.They are looking out for Corporations and their own
political hives - Corporatist Fascism. It is when instead of eliminating the Alternative
Minimum Tax (that eliminates basic deductions on incomes that were
originally considered to be rich, but because of the massive monetary
inflation under the Greenspan Fed, now has pushed millions of middle income
taxpayers into this onerous tax), the Master Planners instead elect
to increase the corporate investment tax credit. It means further, in addition
to offering tax breaks to corporations at the expense of individuals, the Master
Planners outright buy that corporation's stock to keep it from falling, thereby
helping CEOs keep their jobs, the same CEOs who round up political contributions
for the Master Planners. It means encouraging Joe and Jane Middle Class
to borrow up to their eyeballs in debt to pay for basic necessities after their
family job was exported overseas, and then once Joe gets on his feet again
with a new lower paying job, yanking a huge chunk of the interest deduction
on all the home equity debt he was encouraged to acquire so he has
to bear a larger share of the nation's tax burden so Corporations can keep
their breaks, and even get new ones. It's called allowing pharmaceutical companies
to push drugs people don't really need or want subliminally on television during
Desperate Housewives or the ballgame so we can have everyone in America on
4.7 pills at a time, and at the same time watch Congress sit on their
hands while the FDA prepares to unilaterally pass a law that requires a prescription
to buy a bottle of vitamin C, and the FTC arrests/sues anyone who claims vitamin
C can heal an ailment, even if it is true, because the FDA has unilaterally
created a law (outside of Congress) declaring that only drugs can heal ailments,
not vitamins or herbs - in fact, the FTC just trumped up a similar claim against
Kevin Trudeau for using his First Amendment right to free speech about natural
health claims on an infomercial according to the Author's Guild (check
out Kevin Trudeau's best selling book, Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You
To Know About, available in most bookstores). Where's George Washington,
Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, or Ronald Reagan when
you need him? Where's the leadership that is going to stand up for Americans
and say, "Enough already!" How about you, Rick Santorum? Or you, Jim Bunning?
Or do the Master Planners have some secret file hanging over your head, ready
to be sprung the second you step to the plate. Yes, the Fed will no longer
let the American taxpayer know how much money it is creating. It is none
of your business.
If you would like a Free
30 day Trial Subscription to check out our remarkable buy/sell
signals on the blue chip Dow Industrials and S&P 500, NASDAQ 100,
or HUI Amex Gold Bugs Index, simply go to www.technicalindicatorindex.com,
and click on the "Contact Us" button, and email us with your request,
including a password you would prefer to use to access our site. A
subscription gains you access to index buy/sell signals, our thrice
weekly Market Analysis Newsletters, Traders Corner, Guest Articles,
and our Archives. On October 13th, 2005
we closed out our latest Trader's Corner transaction with a 51.8 percent
profit over a 21 trading day period (this is not an annualized figure).
The prior trade garnered a 34 percent profit. These
signals are working.
"And he causes all, the small and the great, and the
rich
and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a
mark on their right hand, or on their forehead,
and he provides that no one should be able to buy or to sell,
except the one who has the mark, either the name of
the beast or the number of his name.
Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate
the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man;
and his number is six hundred and sixty-six."
Revelation 13:16-18
|