|
For a few months now we've been hearing some voices in the investment and
economic communities sound off about the Fed's decision to cease publishing
M3 money supply figures. The publicly stated reason given by the Fed for ending
the public release of M3 data was that it was a cost saving measure. Fine,
but please excuse some of us who feel the move had far more to do with the
fact that the ever growing money supply was starting to have increasingly obvious
effects on prices and values throughout the world economy.
For those who believe that inflation is primarily a monetary event, often
fueled by excessive money and credit creation, the figures regarding the broader measure
of money supply growth reveal an undeniably large pool of liquidity sloshing
through the system. This seems to be the pattern lately throughout the world,
as money supply figures have increased at notable rates (often well above national
GDP growth) in nations across the globe.
Asset prices have been buoyant in many of these economies during the past
few years. After the post-2000 bust in American stocks, and the ensuing retrenchment
of 2001-2002, a new wave of liquidity (brought about, in part, by a pronounced
lowering of interest rates) flooded the nation's economy and found its way
into a new asset class: real estate. This phenomenon was not limited to America;
it has been observed in the other English speaking nations of England and Australia
and in many other nations besides. Building booms in Dubai and Shanghai reveal
the extent to which money is rapidly being put to work in some of the superheated
economies. While the Chinese work to convert their dollar denominated holdings
into tangible commodities and a secured share of energy resources, stock markets
have boomed in the Middle East due to a flood of new money and a post 9/11
repatriation of funds held abroad.
All this speaks to the trend of global liquidity finding its way to commodity
and asset prices, rather than the usual result of increased goods prices, a
theme that is discussed in Marc Faber's book "Tomorrow's
Gold". While a huge shift to manufacturing in low cost nations such as
China and Vietnam has held down prices of manufactured goods, prices for assets,
energy, and a broad array of services have gone kiting upwards. Increased demand
can surely be a contributing factor in some areas of prices increases, as in
the case of energy, but there also seems to be more going on. Companies are
raising prices on goods in the hope of staying one step ahead of rising input
costs and the effects of inflation on their bottom line. Investors increasingly
flock to precious metals in hope of finding a store of value, and buyers of
art in London, New York and Russia seem to be looking to do the same with their purchases.
Meanwhile, demand for investments stays strong despite high market valuations
and the questionable benefits of purchasing long term bonds at prevailing interest
rates.
All this comes back to money supply and our ability to discern, through available
data, how the levels of money existing in the economy are growing in relation
to the demand for it. If excessive amounts of money and credit are continually
pumped into the economy, the sure result will be an increasing level of inflation
and malinvestment, leading to longer term disruptions that will negatively
affect our standard of living, our freedom, and our faith in free markets.
As Congressman Ron Paul questions
the claims of transparency said to be a hallmark of the new Fed Chairman's
administration, some of us are left to wonder: does the announced disappearance
of M3 matter? The shuffling, renaming and reintroducing of figures has occurred
in the past and will likely continue into the future. Perhaps the mass of
Fed watchers and economists will be weaned on a new, "improved" number, much
in the way that we have been overtaken by a new and improved gauge of inflation
(the much loved, "Core" CPI). But maybe this series of events will help push
economic reporting back into the private realm, where politically disinterested
economists attempt to assemble and report the numbers on their own.
|