|

Hank Paulson's nomination as Treasury Secretary may provide some temporary
relief for the sliding dollar owing to Paulson's prominent status as a former
of a top Wall Street firm. But we doubt that Paulson's role at the Treasury
in the next 2½ years will alter the current and emerging fundamental
challenges to the US currency.
Considering Paulson's Wall Street experience and credibility, we regard
his appointment more of a defensive measure to prevent the dollar's downtrend
from accelerating into an uncontrollable pace, considering the endogenous
and exogenous factors starting to weigh on the US currency. Similarly, the
Paulson choice should also prevent the already sliding stock market from
succumbing to further pressures -- pre-midterm election uncertainty, risk
of renewed policy tightening by the Fed and an expected decline in US growth
(we expect Q2 GDP growth to slow to 2.5-2.7%).
Just as the Bernanke Fed is conscious of the dollar repercussions of communicating
an explicit conclusion to the 2-year old policy tightening campaign, the
US administration has grown conscious of the market realities acting against
the US dollar, leaving it no choice but to resort to a figure of credibility.
This is not to say that the US Administration will pursue a strong dollar
policy in both practice and preach as was under the Clinton-Rubin-Summers
years, but will instead aim at pursuing a competitive currency without lacking
in confidence.
The chart above shows the overwhelming relation between the backgrounds of
former US Treasury Secretaries and the value of the US dollar during their
terms. While former US Treasuries with a Wall Street background served during
periods of dollar strength (Bill Simon of Salomon Bros in 74-77, Donald Regan
of Merrill Lynch 81-85 and Robert Rubin of Goldman Sachs 95-99).
The general rationale has been for Secretaries with considerable experience
in Wall Street have supported or served during a period of a strong dollar,
which is in line with shoring up foreign interest in US assets. Treasury secretaries
emerging from an industrial background, or those with considerable policy experience
have generally preferred a weaker dollar so as to boost the priorities of local
industry and employment.
Considering Paulson's international experience, his selection also reflects
the White House increased prioritization to international finance considerations
(pressing on China FX revel before the midterm elections, working with G7 on
imbalances) rather than on domestic policies (failed pension privatization,
passed tax cuts), a Secretary with an international pedigree would be essential.
|