|
Of the earth's 57.4
million square miles of land mass, roughly 20 million square miles [about
one third] of this land mass is located in the southern hemisphere.

The World's Top Ten [Known] Oil Resources:
| Rank |
Country |
Proved reserves
(billion barrels) |
| 1. |
Saudi Arabia |
261.9 |
| 2. |
Canada |
178.81 |
| 3. |
Iran |
125.8 |
| 4. |
Iraq |
115.0 |
| 5. |
Kuwait |
101.5 |
| 6. |
United Arab Emirates |
97.8 |
| 7. |
Venezuela |
77.2 |
| 8. |
Russia |
60.0 |
| 9. |
Libya |
39.0 |
| 10. |
Nigeria |
35.3 |
I've taken the liberty of adding the U.S. [former reserves], Mexico, Alaska
and Norway [North Sea]:

World's Oil
The World's Gold Resources:
Now, if we take a look at the way that the world's
gold production is distributed circa 1985, 1995 & 2004:

Now let's take a look at where the world's significant gold reserves happen
to be located on the world map along side the world's oil reserves [here, I've
taken the liberty of including Mexico - historically known as a gold producing
nation]:

World's Oil and World's Gold
Note how the geographic distribution of the world's gold is "relatively dispersed" while
the world's oil seems to be exclusively located in the northern hemisphere
unless one seriously considers the known reserves of such small players as Ecuador or
Bolivia, where it has been duly
noted,
"..where there is oil there is an excess of politics. Currently Bolivia's
oil is controlled by foreign powers and revenues pour out of the country."
Strange eh?
Stranger yet, or perhaps not, when one stops and looks at the CIA's assessment
of the "resource potential" in the Pacific Ocean [which occupies a huge swath
of the total area of the southern hemisphere] - they list it as being naturally endowed
in the following:
"oil and gas fields, poly-metallic nodules, sand and gravel aggregates,
placer deposits, fish."
From this, should one expect to see at least one globally significant identifiable
oil resource located somewhere in the southern hemisphere?
The blue dots -representing gold - in the southern hemisphere on the map above
certainly attest to the widely dispersed presence of "poly-metallic nodules" [ie.
precious metals]. It's
a well known fact that more than 40,000 tons of gold have been mined from
South Africa alone [representing roughly one third of all gold ever mined in
the world]. Oil must be different?
Now, it's been long held that hydro carbons are formed within the crust of
the earth. Scientists think that the bodies of prehistoric sea animals and
plants became trapped in sediments. After millions of years, heat and pressure
changed them into crude oil and natural gas. Crude oil and natural gas are
usually found together in the crust of the earth.
Perhaps plants and prehistoric sea animals and the like did not live in the
southern hemisphere?
So, it would appear that an investigation of exactly where these prehistoric
sea animals and plants were situated is now in order. As a proxy for pre-historic
life form, let's consider for a moment when
the dinosaurs lived:
Dinosaurs lived throughout the Mesozoic Era, which began 245 million
years ago and lasted for 180 million years. It is sometimes called the Age
of the Reptiles. The era is divided into three periods.
TRIASSIC
245 to 208 million years ago
- During the Triassic period, all land on Earth
existed as one enormous mass. It was called Pangaea. The
super-continent slowly began to break up during the Triassic Period.
- Some reptiles, frogs, turtles and crocodiles existed earlier, but dinosaurs
didn't appear until late in the Triassic period.
- The period marked the rise of small, lightly built dinosaurs.
- The first mammals evolved during the Triassic period.
- Most of the plants that existed were evergreens.
- The period ended with a mass extinction that wiped out most animals
and reptiles. An entire order of plants or animals dies out in a mass extinction.
The dinosaurs that survived flourished in the next period, the Jurassic.

Pangaea
So clearly, fossil evidence supports the contention that prehistoric life
did exist in at least Africa and South America - and I'm going to go out on
a limb and bet it did too in Australia.
Now, if you've read this far - are you too beginning to ask questions like;
why is the worlds gold relatively evenly geographically distributed while the
world's oil is empirically only found above the equator - or viewing planet
earth as a ball - "exclusively in the top half of the ball"? What would you
suppose the real odds are of this occurring? What if we "flip" the word like
this?

Where is all the oil now? Does this look natural? Seem plausible?
Twilight In the Desert or Dawn In the Southern Hemisphere?
The empirical realities outlined above have given me cause to view things
differently. The notion that the world's southern hemisphere contains "virtually
no oil" is, in my mind, implausible if not impossible. At the same time, I
have no doubt and do not deny that known oil reserves in the northern hemisphere
are factually depleting. The real question becomes this; Why are NEW RESERVES that
undoubtedly exist, not being tapped in the southern hemisphere? Better yet,
would anyone be surprised if the answer to this perplexing question involved
money - perhaps even the very foundation of FIAT money. Remember folks, gold
has been around for approximately 6,000 years - oil for only the past 100.
Let me explain.
As I have often stated in papers I've written, INFLATION IS INDEED THE
LIFEBLOOD OF ANY FIAT MONEY SYSTEM. Understanding the true meaning of
this statement is vital and key to understanding so much of what we empirically
experience in day to day life.
In a nutshell, in a fiat money system all "new money" is loaned into existence.
Therefore, a continuously expanding monetary base is, in fact, REQUIRED to
service the accumulating debt.
I've written about this before:

MZM Exponential Growth vs. Fed Funds Rate
The light blue vertical lines are just to point out the relationship between
rates and MZM...
Rates rise and MZM contracts...Rates are lowered and MZM expands...
Debt backed by debt fractional reserve banking, to be sustained from this
point means that MZM growth must grow faster and faster exponentially like
it has been since the early 60's...
Can rates be dropped past zero faster and faster exponentially faster and
faster?
The answer is NO...that is impossible...
But to sustain the current reality MZM must begin moving straight up...forever...
1776 to 1991 MZM growth 2 Trillion in 215 years
1991 to 2000 MZM growth 2 Trillion in 9 years
2000 to 2003 MZM growth 2 Trillion in 3 years
So from now until the end of 2004 MZM must grow by
2 Trillion and after that it must grow by 2 Trillion in 3 months
then 1 month then 1 week then 3 days then 1 day then 8 hours then 2 hours
then less than an hour and so on and so forth until we are down to nanoseconds
and beyond...
Or the System will collapse...the end
While interest rates have empirically risen at the short end of the curve
[in the face of impossible-to-cloak rising inflation] - the liquidity pump
[via repos, monetization of the debt etc.] has only accelerated. The upward
sloping MZM line in the graph above IS THE CRITICAL COMPONENT. Let's
review how this manifests itself in the real world:
We experienced a miraculous "Technology Boom" in the late 1990's. Higher equity
prices, the associated leverage and multiple expansions served as life blood
embellishing the monetary base.
The Fed recently discontinued its reporting of M3 money supply aggregates.
This lends support as to why the Fed and its partners [The
Bank of England et al] are printing their own fiat currencies to enable
them to buy ever increasing amounts of U.S. debt. New money [debt] MUST
CONSTANTLY BE CREATED OR THE CURRENT DOLLAR CENTRIC MONETARY SYSTEM FAILS.
This also answers another one of the world's most perplexing conundrums; namely,
why Western capital was deployed to "seed" the great industrialization miracle
now underway in China. What has occurred in China has resulted from money expansion
[debt] in the West - which was exported from the U.S. so as to neutralize its
deleterious inflationary effects in the domestic market. It worked for a while
too.
But alas, the money supply - as outlined above - still requires additional
near-geometric growth - so oil prices were "SELECTED" to rise, because
oil transactions settle in U.S dollars, thus DEFACTO increasing or heavily
priming the monetary base for still more growth. You see folks; the story that
we are imminently going to run out of arguably finite fossil fuels is just
a backdrop against which the monetary base is expanded. The story is as believable
as the notion that two aircraft brought down the World Trade Centre in that
you can readily find "experts" that would swear both are impossibilities.
To achieve the intended end - armies have been deployed [justification for
yet more debt creation] to oil producing regions to inject a risk premium to
existing oil stocks. Consider the money that would not be spent if armies stayed
home or if new reserves of oil were being "DISCOVERED OR BROUGHT ON LINE" all
over the world? Not only would military deployments and the associated spending
on the military industrial complex cease - oil prices would not rise - in fact,
they might decline. This is why we've been given the hard sell of "Peak
Oil" - that the world's oil supplies are 'running out'. This assertion
is so believable because it has 'strands of truth' to it but has been artfully
deployed as cover since traditional "known" supplies - namely oil located in
the northern hemisphere - are indeed running out.
The suggestion that oil resources located in the southern hemisphere would
actually be withheld from the market by "BIG OIL" would, of course,
necessarily suggest a conspiracy or partnership between big business and big
government.
There are precedents,
however, for exactly this type of working relationship.
Is it a coincidence that chief Peak Oil proponent/point-man, Matthew
Simmons is a member of the Council
On Foreign Relations [CFR]? Is it also a coincidence that the mantra
of the CFR has long been One-World
Government?
The notion that multinational oil companies [largely Anglo American] would
be compelled to bring new petroleum resources on line due to high oil prices
and profits holds as much weight as the manner in which J.P. Morgan, Goldman
Sachs et al sell precious metal. They do so by backing-up-the-truck [especially
in thin markets], selling increasing tonnage of gold [to insatiable buyers
like China, Russia, Iran etc.] in a market that has been rising for 7 years.
More often than not, these sales are conducted in a manner which is completely
inconsistent with maximizing profit?
Not to be outdone, Western Central Banks pre announce gold sales and even
go as far as making public pronouncements that they "might sell gold"? The
effect of this publicity serves to "mark down" the value of their existing
[sovereign?] vaulted stocks. How much clearer can it get that some players/participants
in the game of geopolitical financial affairs are not playing for profit as
we know it [ie. maximizing revenue]?
The painful side effects of what is occurring right under everyone's noses
has been economic dislocations and asset bubbles, punishment of prudent behavior
[saving] and the deteriorating purchasing power of the currency unit we all
refer to as the DOLLAR. Tell tales that this is all occurring has historically
been signified by a rising gold price. This is why the price of gold has been
so vehemently suppressed.
Masking these ill effects has also required the sheer explosion and exponential
growth of derivatives - in the realm of the unregulated - at the behest of
the Fed. With institutions such as J.P. Morgan Chase now sporting an UTTERLY
OBSCENE derivatives book in excess of 48
trillion in notional value [pg. 20 of 27], it begs the question; where
does it all end?
One only need examine material already written and published [circa 1976]
to ascertain the direct linear relationship between the Fed, The Bank of England
and J.P. Morgan Chase to get a "sniff" or a sense of the scope of the complicity
between these players:
"Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank
of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal
Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary
firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York,
J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn, Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the
Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who
directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into
law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal
officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal
Advisory Council in 1914......"
Let's not forget that as a public company, if [any of?] J.P. Morgan Chase's
lines of business are determined
to be in the "National Interest"
"The President just delegated authority to John Negroponte that allows him
to exempt any publicly traded corporation that is working on national defense
issues or national security issues from the reporting and accounting requirements
under the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act. It's basically the rules and
regulations that require companies to keep accurate records, accurate books,
accurate accounting . . . and then disclose those projects and that information
to investors......"
We've been 'strung' the hollow line that this colossus provides necessary "flexibility".
Better stated, it provides a huge black curtain, behind which the biggest financial
fraud ever perpetrated on mankind is being plied. Behind this black curtain,
strategic commodities like oil, gas and precious metals are manipulated through
the use of futures and options and an interest rate swap edifice has been concocted
which serves to hold interest rates and the bond market in check.
Make no mistake; everything mentioned above only underscores how utterly
toxic ANY PETRO TRADE in any currency other than dollars is to
the existing world U.S. dollar centric monetary order.
History is replete with examples of how all pure fiat money systems succumb
to hyperinflationary induced failure. Make no mistake; this is the Dollar's
fate.
|