|
A 3-dimensional
approach to technical analysis
Cycles - Structure - Price projections
"By the Law of Periodical Repetition, everything which has
happened once must happen again, and again, and again -- and not capriciously,
but at regular periods, and each thing in its own period, not another's,
and each obeying its own law ... The same Nature which delights in periodical
repetition in the sky is the Nature which orders the affairs of the earth.
Let us not underrate the value of that hint." -- Mark Twain
Current Position of the Market.
SPX: Long-Term Trend - The 12-year and 10-year cycles are still in
their up-phase, and should continue to influence the long-term trend..
SPX: Intermediate Trend - The intermediate move which began on 6/14
could have found a high at 1314, but one more test of that level is likely
over the next 2 weeks, and it would not be surprising if it were exceeded by
a small margin.
Analysis of the short-term trend is done on a daily basis with the
help of hourly charts. It is an important adjunct to the analysis of daily
and weekly charts which determines the course of longer market trends.
Daily
market analysis of the short term trend is reserved for subscribers. If you
would like to sign up for a FREE 6-week trial period of daily comments, please
let me know at ajg@cybertrails.com.
What's Next?
Cycles are extremely helpful in determining market trends, but there are also
times when they can be extremely confusing ... if we let them! This is one
of those times.
Because of its past regularity, the 4-year cycle has set up expectations that
every four years, around October, the stock market would make a low. Historically,
most of these lows have been easy to recognize because they were preceded by
a decline lasting several weeks to several months. But there have been exceptions,
and in 1986, the cycle was non-existent. I believe that attempts at placing
that low in 1987 are flawed, because I attribute the sudden decline which took
place that year to the final phase of the 7-year cycle. The 4-year cycle had
little influence on the market in 1994 as well, only keeping prices in check
until October, but not causing any significant decline.
The periods discussed are shown on the following charts. What they have in
common is a relatively flat pattern which lasted into the end of the year,
after which the long-term uptrend resumed.


This year's price action more closely resembles that of 1994, but since exact
duplications of past formations probably never take place, it is best to free
our minds of all expectations and simply look at what is happening now!
I think that even the die-hards will have to conclude the 4-year cycle is
not going to be a factor this year. But it does not operate in a vacuum! It
interacts with other cycles to form the total market pattern, and just because
it took a vacation this year, it does not mean that all other cyclic activity
will also stop.
In my view, the long-term trend continues to be influenced by the 12-year
and 10-year cycles, and this could continue for another couple of years. The
decline into June/July lows were caused by the 9-m cycle which, since it has
turned up remains in control of the intermediate trend. But the 40-week cycle
(not to be confused with the 9-month) and the 12-month cycle are expected to
make their lows in October, and we should be looking for evidence that they
are beginning to assert themselves and that a short-term top is forming.
The present uptrend can be said to have started either on 6/14, or on 7/28,
but for our purposes, the latter date is more significant because we can use
the basing action of that time frame to establish Point & Figure projections
for a prospective top. Several projections converged at the 1314/1315 level
and brought a halt to the current rally which, coincidentally also turned out
to be the high point of the 6-week cycle. But there are valid projections extending
up to 1332 which should be kept in mind, especially if they are confirmed by
a reaccumulation pattern formed during the current correction. There are also
Fibonacci proportions which appear to confirm that price level and which give
it additional credibility. Does the SPX have to go to 1332 before it ends the
move which started at 1225? Not necessarily, but it will have to show by its
action that it is in the process of reversing its trend.
The 6-week cycle can be an important gauge of determining if the market has
reached a top. If it appears to struggle in its up-phase and displays abnormal
weakness in its down phase, a reasonable assumption can be made that the intermediate
uptrend has come to an end. However, we do not have this condition right now.
In reaching the 1314 target, the short-term cycle showed good strength and,
so far, with 4 or 5 days to go to its ideal low point, it has demonstrated
only moderate weakness. If quite a bit more weakness does not develop by the
end of next week, there is a chance that the next cycle could carry prices
even higher.
The following 30-m chart of the SPX demonstrates the progression of the present
6-week cycle whose ideal low should come about next Thursday or Friday. Adding
to that probability is the fact that this time frame is 90 trading days from
the May top, and that it represents a Bradley turn date.

In the next chart, we'll see how it fits within the daily chart structure
and what effect it is having on the longer
trend.
Cracks are beginning to appear in the uptrend. The most visible are in the
lower (A/D) oscillator which has now broken a 4-month trend line. The upper
one (momentum) is getting ready to do the same, but since it is retracing from
an overbought level where it remained for some time, the retracement is normal
and is not an indication of imminent weakness. Granted, there are similarities
with the May 8th top, but there are also structural differences.
The price chart is showing some deceleration. By connecting the top of the
moves, it is evident that a rounding top is taking shape, and this would be
consistent with the 40-week/12m cycles applying more and more downward pressure
as it approaches its low point. But none of this is enough to state with certainty
that the move which started at 1225 has ended. This will only be determined
if the up-phase of the next 6-week cycle fails to produce a new high.
On a longer time frame, we could also say that it is the May high of 1326
that is being tested and challenged, not just the recent top of 1314. And since,
the next 2 weeks should bring a resolution to this pattern, they should be
watched with a great deal of interest.

Looking past October, it is a little more difficult to foresee exactly what
will take place although, based strictly on cycle analysis, it would seem reasonable
that the long-term uptrend will be extended, but for how long? It is probably
impossible to quantify the degree to which cycles account for market trends
and that which is attributable to economic and geopolitical developments. Or
are these, also, motivated by cyclical forces?
This week, John Mauldin reports that the Fed is still concerned with inflation
and that this could mean additional rate hikes starting in December. He also
mentions shrinking liquidity and other factors which could affect the economy.
He does not present a very optimistic picture for the future, and if he is
right, this should, at some point, be reflected in the behavior of the market.
Summary:
The 4-year cycle can no longer be considered a factor which will influence
stock market action this year, but the 40-week and 12-month cycles which are
due to make their lows in mid-to-late October should bring about a moderate
pull-back.
On a shorter-term basis, after some additional correction, the recent high
of 1314 is likely to be tested and could be exceeded.
|