|
5.5 Trillion's worth of business sure isn't what it used to be. I mean, where
I come from people normally celebrate, hold news conferences or a ticker tape
parades perhaps - on occasions such as conducting RECORD 5.5 TRILLION new
business in one quarter! But no, not the humble guys and gals over at J.P.
Morgan; they accomplish this Houdini-esque feat, and their accomplishment get BURIED in
what amounts to "minutes" of a two bit obscure publication of the Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency? Who would have ever thought such an accomplishment
could "come and go" without a congratulatory howdy-doodle and a little face
time for those responsible from the Wall Street Journal or CNBC?
Ripley's Believe It or Not?
According to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for the U.S.A.
in their Quarterly Derivative
Fact Sheet claim that J.P. Morgan Chase's derivatives book grew from 48.26
Trillion notional at Q4/05 to 53.76 Trillion at Q1/06. That's RECORD new
growth of 5.5 TRILLION notional folks!
Let's first try to quantify just how much a 5.5 TRILLION build in a
derivatives trading book over a three month period really is, shall we?
The first quarter of 2006 contained 65 business days [64 excluding Presidents
Day]. 5.5 Trillion divided by 65 equals 84.6 Billion per day in NEW
BUSINESS - forgetting rollover of existing business which, in itself, must
be massive. But earth shattering records like this should leave a little bit
bigger footprint than an oblique mention in a seldom read trade journal, ehhh?
Records this big, one might expect SOMEONE to do a little bit of chest
thumping, ehh? Well low and behold, the New York Mercantile Exchange [NYMEX]
- where a good deal of the world's precious metals and energy derivatives are
traded - were
doing just that, crowing about a parade of trading volume records of their
own:
Rising Tides [and Big Parades] Float Many Boats [host many floats]
Funny thing, I'm certain I read somewhere that J.P. Morgan only began trading
Natural Gas Derivatives in December of 2005? Not a big worry, either they did
or they did not and if it's the former - it lends even more credence to my
line of thought.
There's a very strong correlation between J.P. Morgan's explosive derivatives
growth and successive volume records at NYMEX - particularly in the
electronic NYMEX ClearPort® trading
system which is largely used to trade Natural Gas.
We know for a fact, that J.P. Morgan's involvement in these derivatives is
not being motivated by "end user demand" because the Comptroller of the Currency's Quartery
Derivative Report tells us end user demand for derivatives is all but
non existent [on pg. 10 of 33],
Aggregate End User Notionals for all derivatives have gone from 1.4 TRILLION
in Q1/95 to an AGGREGATE 2.6 TRILLION as of Q1/06. Meanwhile AGGREGATE DEALER
NOTIONALS [of the 5 largest dealers] have spiraled from 15.9 TRILLION to
102 TRILLION over the same time period.
So at very best, they are speculating; but what could their true motivation
be? Who would want to risk their own capital to "trade" something, like natural
gas, that is difficult to store with well documented reports abounding that
all storage facilities are already full - and there's no where left to put
the stuff? It's beyond me. But then again, maybe I just underestimate? These
guys at ole J.P. Morgan really are good. After all, they can pull 5.5 Trillion
rabbits out of their hats, can't they?
We DO KNOW that the derivatives books of both Citibank and Bank of
America, while not to compare with J.P. Morgan's, have grown in magnitudes
measured in Trillions too. Does this not have all the earmarks of a massive "shell
game"?
In case anyone's interested, here's what happened to the price of Natural
Gas in the first quarter of 2006;

If anyone is surprised by any of this, you should not be. This type of guffaw
goes on constantly with respect to Goldman Sachs and gold futures [and I suspect
silver too] - which likely, at least partly explains the headlines above regarding
volume records in gold and silver futures and options over the same period
of time.
Of course then again, maybe J.P. Morgan's blow out quarter where they conducted
5.5 Trillion new notional in derivatives had nothing to do with the precipitous
drop in the price of natural gas at all. Maybe, it's just like authorities
say, that storage facilities [that no one can practically see or measure] really
are full. Maybe J.P. Morgan conducted all that trade to benefit shareholders.
But I've got a sinking feeling that we'd never be told the difference if things
didn't work out that way. That became abundantly clear when Dawn Kopecki reported
in BusinessWeek Online in a piece titled, Intelligence
Czar Can Waive SEC Rules,
"President George W. Bush has bestowed on his intelligence czar, John Negroponte,
broad authority, in the name of national security, to excuse publicly traded
companies from their usual accounting and securities-disclosure obligations.
Notice of the development came in a brief entry in the Federal Register,
dated May 5, 2006, that was opaque to the untrained eye."
So let's just say, if J.P. Morgan were manipulating markets deemed to be "strategic" or
in-the-national-interest, they would likely be "excused" from proper or adequate
disclosure to shareholders should their "bets" or schemes not work out quite
as intended.
At very least, trading growth of 5.5 Trillion at ANY FINANCIAL INSTITUTION in
one quarter, one might think, would be more than reason enough for a Royal
Commission or a Congressional Investigation. Where I come from anything
that grows that quickly is usually cancerous. But somehow, J.P. Morgan pulls
this stunt off and cannot even get interviewed about it by the mainstream financial
press? Give your head a shake!
Let's just remember, that if the Natural Gas market WERE being manipulated,
the regulators that would be charged with investigating then possibly admitting
it; and then sorting it out are the same group at the CFTC that have stonewalled Ted
Butler and his well documented public assertions that the silver market
[COMEX division of NYMEX] is manipulated.
I actually hope and pray my suspicions about natural gas and its price collapse
are wrong, winter is coming soon and I heat my house with natural gas. It would
be a real bummer to flick the furnace on one crisp evening and find out there's
no juice left in the system.
Anyway, it seemed only fitting that there be something to celebrate J.P. Morgan's
record quarter - and doesn't everyone love a parade? Now, if it could only
pass the smell test.

|