|
"Not until Thursdays' productivity report is there a significant chance of
domestic economics driving a rally in metals… The path upward has been
reopened for gold and silver to drift higher towards a retest of the recent
highs, which will provide significant resistance. Just as many speculative
traders go long, the threat is that a failure from the $700 area would either
appear to be a double top or be labeled a corrective move up before a new impulsive
wave down." ~ Precious Points: Why Not Gold?, April 28, 2007
Expectations were uncertain going into the productivity report, but Thursday's
numbers came in better than expected and provided the anticipated rally in
metals, though not before a somewhat harrowing selloff through recent support.
Unfortunately, despite the run over S&P 1500, Friday's anemic job growth
and higher unemployment tempered optimism and left the overall outlook unclear
and little changed for the week.
Little has changed and what has been changing does not bode particularly well
for metals. With little exception, most of the inflation related data released
over the last two weeks has been tame, and this has gone a long way towards
putting something of a floor under the dollar and limiting investor interest
in metals - particularly when there's large-cap tech stocks to buy and M&A
on which to speculate. Though it's likely to start with a few real sleepers,
next week starts a new round of inflation data with PCI and the latest on M2.
But with the next FOMC meeting now only days away, it's now impossible to
keep Wednesday's statement out of the trading outlook. The Fed's recent statements
have consistently come out in favor of gold and gold stocks, primarily because
of an inflation-fighting bias, and there's finally starting to be reason to
believe this next meeting will be different in outlook, if not immediate result.
The last statement and the corresponding minutes revealed a growing willingness
of the committee members to entertain the idea of cutting rates if the housing
market continues to weaken, but nothing in the last two months has made it
any more likely that they'll actually offer rate accommodations this year.
The yield curve, in fact, has since signaled not only a slightly more optimistic
view of the economy, but also decreasing inflation concerns. Realists, therefore,
are not expecting any significant change in the Fed's language.
Last week, this update highlighted a very real change in the form of the Fed's
fairly atypical reverse transactions, which actually drain money from the banking
system. Since then, despite starting with a large repo on Monday, the week
ended with a net reverse of $3.25 billion. Over the same period, the StreetTracks
gold ETF, GLD, has seen near record redemptions, which could possibly be a
related liquidity issue. More likely however, the redemptions reflect the growing
realization that seasonality is beginning to turn against metals, and the chances
of a stratospheric, parabolic rise like last year's is becoming less and less
likely, at least in forward months.
The concept of liquidity has become so central to the metals and the money
markets in general that it's been a subject of scrutiny for some time. Though
liquidity is quantifiable in terms of money supply expansion, rate spreads,
carry trades, and other more or less significant numbers, the emerging consensus
seems to be that liquidity is mostly a state of mind. In other words, markets
can remain highly liquid until suddenly they are not. Corporate paper, for
example, is highly liquid until there's a default that sends money fleeing,
even as most companies remain sound investments.
The global nature of markets today means such a perceived threat could come
from almost any quarter and cause severe dislocations even if the damage is
not systemic or rational. Though such a hiccup in liquidity could spell disaster
for metals virtually overnight, there aren't any currently significant fundamental
obstacles to a rise in gold and silver. Even the uptick in central bank sales
will still probably remain below the total annual sales quota, and gold miners
are still avoiding forward hedging like a plague.
Instead, as stated last week, metals could run afoul of technical analysts
if they rally close to recent or even last year's highs but fail to reach significant
new levels. Even if the Fed ignites a rally on Wednesday, as it has in recent
months, profit-taking, instead of frenetic new buying, is still the most probable
ultimate result.
The much more pleasant alternative is illustrated by the gold chart below
which shows the return of a multi-year trendline as support. If the situation
does not deteriorate, and ennui remains the greatest challenge, then any selloff
in metals will probably be limited to the support levels mentioned here for
months, though that means a return to the lower channel.

Chart by Dominick
As investors debate the merit of the perennial "Sell in May" adage and try
to muster enough casual interest to stay in one of the hottest stock rallies
in history, metals simply aren't attracting the interest of currency enriched
foreign investors or of revenue-seeking private capital. But, the Fed's statement
next week is unlikely to be inconsistent with the data being released later
in the week and therefore, as long as the markets get it right on Wednesday,
any upward push provided by the FOMC could probably be sustained through the
week. If this is enough to quiet the critics and get the recent sellers back
on board, then a genuine breakout could be in the cards. Otherwise, if the
Fed chooses to emphasize the recent decline in inflation and this is supported
by the subsequent data, it's liable to be a long, boring summer for the precious
metals.
|