|
With S&P 500 bank/financial stocks the worst performing sectors so far
in 2007, it is becoming clear that the inverted yield curve has damaged investor
confidence in the group. Conversely, with utility stocks the best performing
sector this year, it is obvious that investors have continued their defensive
hunt for yield. Suffice to say, given that financial stocks typically outperform
early in the cycle and utilities tend to beat other sectors late (or in the
down cycle), the action in 2007 would seem to suggest that the bear is growling.
The only problem with the above 'cycle' logic is that it doesn't take into
account actual performance numbers. To be sure, with utility stocks already
up a whopping 16.2% year-to-date (as measured by the XLU index) and financial
stocks also in the black, sector analysis has become vain in the face of one
simple conclusion: bull! In other words, it doesn't matter that gains have
been stronger in defensive yield plays, because these gains are not arriving
at the expense of other groups.
Incidentally, what has gone wrong for bearish forecasts thus far in 2007 isn't
exactly a secret: corporate earnings have climbed faster than expected. And
although many bears are quick to warn of the growing disconnect between strong
corporate earnings growth and sluggish U.S. economic growth, that nearly 50%
of S&P 500 earnings was generated from abroad in 2006 is reason enough
to give any prognosticator pause. As silly as this may have sounded only a
few months ago, U.S. economic activity could flatten and corporate earnings
could still continue to rise, at least until the unstable moorings underpinning
global growth are shaken...
When Will Confidence in Utilities Be Shaken?
As the timely and profitable Wish List position in Great Plains Energy highlighted,
as recently as last year there were some opportunities in the utilities group.
Moreover, with a long-term approach some potentially attractive opportunities
can still be talked about today (for example, former Wish List stock, Hawaiian
Electric, yields 4.9%, and given its regulatory successes could be a desirable
covered call consideration). Nevertheless, what cannot be ignored when studying
the diverse utilities group is that the stocks, on average, yield less than cash
does in some savings accounts, let alone a 1-year money market fund. Moreover,
and as the recent activity in REITs can attest to, stretched fundamentals along
with less than attractive yields can lead to a devastating fallout when the
selling starts (REITs have been crashing on a relative basis in recent weeks
~ pg.
2 PDF).
But when will the selling start? Last year around this time we released our
top-30 utility takeover targets and - not including the one company that has
been acquired - the average gain since has been 31.2%, or double the average
gain in the utilities group. Given that no set of fundamentals has backed this
surge, these gains comment well on previous sentiments; that this has been
a historic rally in anything with yield, and, apparently, any yield will do.
In short, exactly when the investor rush into utilities will reverse course
is a difficult question to answer. Indeed, in a financial world keyed on the
earnings mirror and nondescript liquidity dealings rather than actual business
fundamentals and the myriad of ominous obstacles that may lurk ahead, there
is no sundial to timely measure future changes in investor sentiment. But make
no mistake: utilities, as measured by annual appreciation in the XLU since
2003, have little chance of generating 25+% annual returns before dividends
going forward, and the contrarian conclusion that a reckoning is near draws
deeper tones with every move higher in the group. The question is, how many
utility enthusiasts have been fooled into believing that their dividends offer
protection during a bear market?
Disclosure: No one at FallStreet.com has any investment
position in the companies mentioned above.

|