|
So, we didn't get our liftoff last week exactly as expected, or perhaps it's
still playing out, but the issue for the bigger picture in gold remains. Remember,
what has to be decided is whether this is the middle part of a corrective pattern
from the 2006 highs or the start of a new impulsive bull leg. Ultimately, silver
will probably take its general direction from whichever outcome is decided
for gold, leaving a very bullish future with the possibility of one more correction
first. $14 ... remains a psychological resistance level. The Street seemed
to shrug off the much higher than expected PPI data last week, but it is unlikely
to do so again if CPI comes in above expectations. Expectations for further
rate cuts in the US, though decreasing, persist. The greatest risk to the rally
in gold ... falling expectations for another cut. ~ Precious Points: Liftoff? October
13, 2007
It was the liftoff indeed as gold's bounce off the triangle trendline described
here last week extended over $770 in the front month futures contract. Any
question as to the short term direction for precious metals was settled Monday
night with Chairman Bernanke's recounting of recent financial turmoil to the
Economics Club of New York, wherein he asserted that inflation readings would
continue to be "favorable" as housing drags on the overall economy through
at least the first half of 2008.

As if echoing this portion of Bernanke's remarks, Sectary of the Treasury
Henry Paulson said in a high profile speech the following day housing would
drag on the economy longer than expected. Though falling housing prices and
the writedowns suffered by owners of asset-backed derivatives suggest a deflationary
spiral, these comments seemed to renew Bernanke's pre-chairmanship promise
that any deflationary period would be mild and short lived, and his speech
had the overall effect of opening the door to the idea of further rate cuts
on October 31 and, of course, to further weakness in the dollar and further
strength in precious metals.
This was somewhat of a reversal from last week, which saw decreasing likelihood
for a another rate cut which threatened to spark a rally in the dollar. Instead,
as comments in the TTC forums indicate, the dovish posture from the U.S.'s
top economic and monetary policy makers clearly tipped the scales in favor
of further advances for gold and silver - enough so that we at last entered
the target area for this advance according to the corrective pattern from the
May 2006 high scenario. Remember that theory would have a seemingly impulsive
move make new highs, fail, and retrace the advance well below $700. As this
update has maintained for weeks, the current advance in metals, and gold in
particular, has been almost entirely based on currency rates, and these hinge
on relative economic strength as well as the degree to which the Fed remains
dovish and the ECB hawkish.
The only real scare came as Bernanke spoke about "uncertainty" Friday morning,
seeming to suggesting at first glance that any premium built upon rate cutting
expectations were unfounded. But, upon further inspection, however, it could
be reasonably argued Bernanke was actually further establishing the foundation
for another cut in October. Though he had acknowledged the Fed's success at
on Monday in stabilizing financial markets, a fact that is supported by recent
indicators, his attention began to shift towards the larger economy on Monday
and this shift was fully realized in Friday's address to the St. Louis conference.
In complex, technical jargon, Bernanke's speech essentially traced the history
of a certain line of thinking related to economic uncertainty as it pertained
to the Fed's choice of policy instrument. Previous editions of this update
spotlighted the current interest-rate targeting regime, calling it Bernanke's
beautiful machine, and noted its relative benefits for inflation-sensitive
commodities like precious metals compared to the alternative approach of dictating
money supply growth. If Bernanke is in fact, acknowledging the inherent difficulties
of maintaining an interest rate target in uncertain economic terrain and therefore
contemplating abandoning a fixed Fed funds target rate in favor of a controlled
rate for money supply growth, this will have uncertain effects on gold, but
will probably be negative in the balance.
However, the much more likely interpretation, at this juncture, of the chairman's
admission that "intuition suggests that stronger action by the central bank
may be warranted to prevent particularly costly outcomes" is that Gentle Ben
is preparing the ground for another rate cut. Though the market is becoming
increasingly dubious of the Fed's ability to smooth out the business cycle
and save a receding economy, it's difficult to imagine anything but an enthusiastic
response from precious metals markets to further policy accommodations.
And then, of course, there's inflation. Bernanke explicitly affirmed the assertion
here last week it was utter foolishness to assume the Fed no longer cared about
inflation. To the contrary, Bernanke explicitly said uncertain times like these
make the Fed's ability to anchor inflation expectations, that is to create
a sense of trust in the general public as to the Fed's inflation fighting abilities,
central to designing effective monetary policy. And how is that accomplished
in the face of steadily rising oil and gold and a sinking dollar? The Fed is
able to point to declines in its core CPI, where declines in the average cost
of college tuition, landline telephones and automobiles outweigh rises in housing
costs as an overall reduction in the expenses of the typical American consumer.
And of course the higher costs of gas and food don't factor at all. So, to
the Fed, you can own a new or used car, but you can't drive it enough for the
cost of gas to factor into your monthly expenditures. Sound like anybody you
know? Me either.
Still, the Fed can probably depend on falling housing prices and the consequently
weakening economy to keep a lid on aggregate demand and inflation for the time
being, making their "favorable" inflation expectations at least credible. But
in the face of such a fragile situation, and with at least one presidential
candidate calling for the outright dismantling of the Federal Reserve System,
the role of Federal Reserve chairman will not be easy and Bernanke is probably
wise to remain the humble academic. And as his fate and that of his institution
unfolds, the dollar price of precious metals will be a key factor in shaping
public perception and political exigency.

For several months, this update has held the 5-week simple moving average
in gold as a sort of barometer for the short term health of the gold bull market.
In most cases, two consecutive weekly closes above this level have a high correlation
with extended rallies of $40-$60 or more. This level has been explicitly mentioned
in the TTC forums and chatroom as the bare minimum for confirmation of a reversal,
even now that we're in the target range for the corrective pattern. It's therefore
a bit surprising that so many continue to take short positions in gold. After
Friday's developments, near term volatility is virtually guaranteed, but without
even a retest of the 5-week moving average, it's impossible to expect anything
but a consolidation leading to new highs. Before long, if this proves to be
the case, the corrective pattern will be invalidated altogether. But it isn't
yet.

|