|
There have certainly been a few things locally and globally that point to
good times ahead for gold and silver.
The first was from that tried and tested source of financial news - my wife.
She rarely if ever mentions precious metals unless they are wrapped around
her fingers, wrists and neck in an ornate and beautiful fashion. But this time
it was different. One of her wealthier associates had been talking to her financial
adviser who was recommending she diversify some money out of property into
gold and silver. If my wife never again said anything about precious metals
investment, this would have been enough.
This told me two things. Firstly, the public is cottoning on to this gold-silver
thing. In other words, we are approaching the endgame for this particular gold-silver
bull phase. When gold and silver begins to be discussed by people who never
mentioned it before, we are on the verge of a blow-off.
Secondly, she was recommended to lighten up on property. We have seen investment
money first chase the stock market up to the year 2000. When that went sour,
the hot money began to diversify into property until recently. Now that is
going sour so where does the fiat money go? You don't need a PhD to see where
a lot of money is going to flow towards in the months ahead. As the gold-silver
bull gains speed, people who did not care for gold before and will not care
afterwards will be jumping onto the "next big thing" and creating a
positive feedback loop for a frenzy of momentum trading.
So far, so good. Meanwhile I read that various governments are not too keen
on dollar refugees parking their cash in their currencies and forcing them
up on the international exchanges. The formula is well known; a more expensive
currency makes exports more expensive and hence distorts the trade balance.
As a result, various capital controls are in force or being devised rather
than going for devaluation at this point (i.e. we like the value our currency
is at, go and bother another currency). Well, that is bullish for gold and
silver too because there is no Central Bank for gold and silver to deter investors.
You can park your dollars in gold and silver without too many obstacles in
your way.
On the subject of central banks, did you know that while selling gold to manage
its price at sensitive times (i.e. not all the time) these guys may be buying
it back on the quiet to reload their guns? At least that is the implication
of a document cited by GATA from the Reserve Bank of Australia. The document
is at http://www.rba.gov.au/
PublicationsAndResearch/RBAAnnualReports/2003/Pdf/operations_financial_markets.pdf
I quote from two parts:
"Foreign currency reserve assets and gold are held primarily to support intervention
in the foreign exchange market."
That is the part GATA quotes. There is another ignored quote before it and
my emphasis is in italics.
"There is a range of operations that the RBA undertakes in the foreign exchange
market on its own account. The most noticeable, though least frequent, outright
transactions are those intended to influence the exchange rate - "intervention" in
common parlance. In these cases, the RBA buys or sells the Australian dollar
in exchange for US dollars, with a view to affecting not only the currency's
short-term price but also expectations about its likely course over the longer
run. Such transactions are typically infrequent, but in fairly substantial
amounts, and may be accompanied by statements making explicit the RBA's views.
Their impact on the domestic money market is fully offset, so that they have
no impact on domestic monetary conditions.
The RBA also undertakes transactions to restore its reserve position
after periods of intervention have occurred. Such transactions are typically
consistent over a period of time, but in small amounts. While they
probably, at the margin, have some impact on the exchange rate, they are
undertaken in ways designed to minimise such effects. Their intention is
to take advantage of a more favourable exchange rate to re-position the
RBA's portfolio."
This raises an interesting question for those who believe central bank gold
reserves are vastly understated. If gold is treated like foreign currencies
in a government's strategy when they sell it then why not when they buy back?
If a government buys back foreign currencies in a quiet, piecemeal fashion
in order to reload, then why not gold as well? If you accept the first quote
then why reject the implication of the second? You cannot pick and choose your
quotes.
That sounds like a valid question to me. Not that it matters, gold and silver
are in bull markets whether central banks have the gold or not.
Further comments can be had by going to my silver blog at http://silveranalyst.blogspot.com where
readers can obtain a free issue of The Silver Analyst and learn about subscription
details. Comments and questions are also invited via email to silveranalysis@yahoo.co.uk.
|