|
I found Nicolas Sarkozy's speech last week before a joint session of Congress
to be quite interesting and revealing. "Sarkozy l'Américain" put on
a very moving address, to be sure, proclaiming his admiration and love for
the U.S.
"France will never forget the sacrifice of your children," he said, in reference
to the young Americans who died defending freedom on the beaches of Normandy
and Provence over 60 years ago. He also touched on the currency issues, albeit
briefly. "The dollar cannot remain solely the problem of others," he said,
adding "If we're not careful, monetary disarray could morph into economic war.
We would all be its victims."
Mr. Sarkozy's words are important because they may provide clues to the path
the Europeans might take with their monetary policy. American pundits on popular
business shows have been pounding the table demanding European rate cuts, arguing
such cuts are needed to stop the U.S dollar's decline -- a course of action
that judging from the preponderance of Mr. Sarkozy's speech might very well
be in the cards.
The fact that he too is a politician charged with keeping his citizenry happy,
and fully employed, must surely weigh on which side of the issue not only he
might be on, but also the other major exporting powers in Europe. Choosing
between getting repaid in cheaper dollars by one's friend -- taking one for
the team, as it were -- versus shown the door by one's electorate, may not
prove to be such a difficult decision after all.
Of course a worldwide effort to reduce interest rates means that exchange
rates would look stable to the casual observer. You can always fool some of
the people all of the time. Never mind that this whole charade would be akin
to an out of shape boxer demanding that his opponent enter the ring with a
self-inflicted arm fracture. Monetary policy is not as transparent as a boxing
match, and never will be, despite what we are told.
Such a move by the Europeans would arguably be welcomed by U.S officials as
well, who up to now have had to ward off increased scrutiny of the dollar's
decline. Comments such as not allowing price increases to be passed through
to the consumer, as made by Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke recently,
come to mind. He doesn't tell us how exactly that might be accomplished, although
I suppose crappy Chinese imports can be made crappier still and smaller portions
can effectively prevent food price increases, among other things.
Case in point is a little breakfast treat I pick up for my daughter on the
way to daycare every morning. This past week I noticed that the entire package
now weighs less, which of course means there is a smaller portion in the bag.
In addition, the wrapping also looks to be of lower quality, with the colors
not as bright and full as before. I suppose this kind of thing can continue
until said portions become so small that they get caught between our teeth
instead of quelling our hunger. Perhaps at that point something gives, but
I'm not holding my breath, either way.
Despite what comes to pass in the foreign exchange markets the real gauge
of what is actually happening will be reflected by the price of gold. Gold
has and will continue to perform well in the current environment. From the
Federal Reserve's own inflation adjustment calculator, we can easily ascertain
that using the government's version of inflation today's price of gold should
be about $2129.62, given an $850 price from 1980. I say the 'government's version'
of inflation because anyone that has shopped for life's necessities in the
last few years certainly knows better than to believe those numbers.
If we were to assume an inflation rate of 10% since 2002 -- the point in time
when the Fed's reflation efforts kicked into high gear and oil prices took
off -- we get a gold price today of $3234.58. It should be clear the gold price,
which this morning is at $792 US, has much, much further to run.
|