|
When
it was learned that the Treasury was to support the sale of 400 tonnes of gold
all were surprised. We realized that Congress would still have to be asked
to approve the sale. When the mist cleared and we saw in sharp focus what lay
ahead we realized that much more needed to be done before the sales became
a reality. These are the steps still to be overcome for these sales to take
place:
- The I.M.F. must trim their staff, by 15%. This is not a quick action?
- The U.S.A. must get the approval of Congress; an approval that was denied
them in the past.
- They must get the approval of 85% of their members and the U.S.A. accounts
for 17% of the votes. They must find another 68% of their members
in favor.
- They must organize their sales as below.
Should these obstacles be overcome at some point in the future, the proceeds
would then be used to finance an expected income gap in this fiscal year of
about U.S.$224m and the balance be placed in a fund from which the income can
be used to fund the I.M.F.'s overheads.
What Type of Sales Will These Be?
The Second Amendment to the Articles of Agreement in April 1978 required that
the IMF:
- When dealing in gold, avoid managing its price or establishing a fixed
price.
- The IMF may sell gold outright on the basis of prevailing market prices,
and may accept gold in the discharge of a member's obligations at an agreed
price, based on market prices at the time of acceptance.
- The IMF does not have the authority to engage in any other gold transactions
-- such as loans, leases, swaps, or use of gold as collateral -- nor does
it have the authority to buy gold.
- The IMF has a systemic responsibility to avoid causing disruptions to the
functioning of the gold market.
- Profits from any gold sales should be used whenever feasible to create
an investment fund, of which only the income should be used.
How will it achieve this? It is thought that the I.M.F. will only sell to
another Central Bank, but we don't see any such stipulation in their articles,
but it is one of their options. In the past they have used the auction method
of selling gold [at the highest offered price], but again this is not stipulated
in their Articles. They also have the right to choose one or more bidders at
this price. The fact that the Central Bank Gold Agreement was mentioned implies
that they could sell in the same manner and on the "open" market. In a background
paper, the IMF said if the gold was sold on the 'open' market, as opposed to
off-market transactions, the sales would be phased over time to avoid market
disruptions. This gives us direction on how the sales will occur. The current
European agreement limits banks' gold sales to no more than 500 tonnes a year.
Central Bank sales over the next 19 months to reduce by 400 tonnes, replaced
by I.M.F. sales?
Perhaps the most important, if somewhat vague statement coming from the I.M.F.
at the end of January meeting said, "Secondly, the sale should take place
within the existing Central Bank Gold Agreement, that is to say it would not
be additional to sales already programmed by central banks, but would be accommodated
by reductions in the amounts of gold that the central banks might sell under
the Central Bank Gold Agreement. And thirdly, we have emphasized that the
sale should be undertaken in a very careful way in terms of their periodicity
amounts and manner of sale such as not to disturb the market."
We sat and stared at this for a while making sure the words did actually mean
what they said and were not the writers mistake, but there it is, no mistake!
They are saying, "it would not be additional to sales already programmed
by central banks, but would be accomodated by REDUCTIONS in the amount of gold
that the central banks might sell under the Central Bank Gold Agreement"!
By
our reckoning there are only 537± tonnes left of the "announced sales" plus
a possible Spanish 100 tonnes of "unannounced sales" left to sell. If we interpret
their words correctly, the 400 tonnes from the I.M.F. would replace 400 of
these tonnes, leaving the signatories to the agreement possibly selling another
139 tonnes of "announced sales" and a possible 100 tonnes of "unannounced sales" over
the next 19 months? Perhaps this is why the sales pace under the agreement
has slowed down so much? Bear in mind the I.M.F. proposed sales, if it can
hudle the remaining obstacles, may be some time away still. There's no hurry
for the signatories to sell the little left, so they can afford to wait still?
Will the Sales Impact the Gold Price?
Perhaps these obstacles can be overcome by September 26th, 2008, at which
point these proposed sales - were they to occur thereafter over the next year.
With the statement above from Crocker of the I.M.F. we see that the full compliment
of gold sales from the C.B.G.A. will not be met, and will fall to around 239
tonnes over the next 19 months. Add the 400 tonnes of the I.M.F. and the amount
to sell over 19 months remains the same [plus a potential 100 tonnes from Spain]
still only 8.4 tonnes a week, if indeed they will sell what they announced?
- The 'ceiling' of 500 tonnes ensures that all "Official" sales will not
affect the gold price.
- The I.M.F. have said they will not disturb the gold price.
- Lower sales than the "ceiling" of 500 tonnes would actually spur the gold
price higher still.
- And against this positive picture, all the sales of the European Central
Bank in the past [the "Washington Agreement" from 2000 to 2004 and the Central
Bank Gold Agreement 2005 to 2009] have not prevented the gold price from
nearly quadrupling.
This is extremely positive for the gold price!
If they went, instead, to the auction method it would simply be an open invitation
to Russia or China or another Central Bank to bid in the knowledge that they
will get the gold without driving up the gold price. Once it is known they
achieved the purchase, it will be known that gold is being sought after by
Central Banks. Add to that the fact that the sales will be limited to 400 tonnes. This
removes the so-called Central Bank gold sales "overhang" from the market.
It is clear that there is a spirit, quite rightly, that is within "Official
Circles" that does not like to further gold sales.
If
they sell direct to a Central Bank then their attempts to abandon the use of
gold in the monetary system will in reality, if not in theory, be undermined.
This can only be positive for the gold price!
"So any which way you look at it these potential sales if they come
to pass, will, in reality, have a positive impact on the gold price."
This is a snippet from the recent issue of the weekly newsletter from: www.GoldForecaster.com.
For the entire report, please visit www.GoldForecaster.com.
|