|
Ben Bernanke has attacked the threat of deflation with great zeal. We knew
that he would. But what we don't know is how Mr. Bernanke will respond to today's
stagflationary pressures, if at all, and/or whether or not the slumping dollar
will eventually ignite a monetary policy response. Yes, Mr. Bernanke has assured
policy makers and investors that fighting recession is higher on the Fed's
check list than directly attacking inflation. However, if USD creation is the
primary cause of the inflationary problem now rupturing through out the global
economy Bernanke may have little choice but to eventually switch focus.
Suffice to say, Ben Bernanke is one of the major reasons why gold is hitting
record highs today. Bernanke's Fed has aggressively cut interest rates in an
attempt to liquidity a financial marketplace burdened by terrifying episodes
of seizure and failure, but what they have not been able to do is disperse
monetary stimulus with any degree of precision. Thus, during a time when investors
do not want to buy stocks and they are not eager to bottom pick real estate,
the commodities arena is attracting money flows. So long as the Fed keeps promising
more rate cuts and flows to equities and real estate remain restrained, eroding
investor confidence in the U.S. dollar has the potential to keep the commodity
fires stoked.
Given that supply/demand fundamentals do play a key role in determining commodity
prices, it may seem a stretch to blame Bernanke for the commodities boom now
transpiring. To better illustrate some of the forces at work drawing on one
of Bernanke's most famous quotes is applicable (bolds added):
Today an ounce of gold sells for $300, more or less. Now suppose that
a modern alchemist solves his subject's oldest problem by finding a way
to produce unlimited amounts of new gold at essentially no cost. Moreover,
his invention is widely publicized and scientifically verified, and he
announces his intention to begin massive production of gold within days.
What would happen to the price of gold? Presumably, the potentially
unlimited supply of cheap gold would cause the market price of gold to
plummet. Indeed, if the market for gold is to any degree efficient, the
price of gold would collapse immediately after the announcement of the
invention, before the alchemist had produced and marketed a single ounce
of yellow metal.
What has this got to do with monetary policy? Like gold, U.S. dollars have
value only to the extent that they are strictly limited in supply. But the
U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its
electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as
it wishes at essentially no cost. By increasing the number of U.S. dollars
in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S.
government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services,
which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. Bernanke.
November 21, 2002
If the correlation is not otherwise clear, commodity prices - and precious
metals in particular - are efficiently responding to Bernanke's pledge to keep
cutting interest rates before such cuts actually transpire. Still not following?
Well, the promise of more Fed intervention immediately hurts the dollar because
no other major central bank is as dovish as Bernanke's Fed, and the slumping
dollar immediately sends players into precious metals. Moreover, as the Fed's
super-dovish words and actions fail to ignite a return of confidence in either
stocks or real estate - the two major assets on the consumer's balance sheet
- precious metals attract even more flows from investors too scared to hold
traditional assets.
If this all sounds confusing fear not because when, and if, other central
banks start trying to debase their currencies in response to Bernanke's ploy
the plot thickens and gold goes superboom! Or so the story goes...
Goldscape IPO Launch at $1,000 an ounce?
Recall if you will the Netscape IPO in 1995. It was common sense back then
that led to the conclusion that a money losing and nearly revenueless experiment
should not be valued at $2+ Billion after its stock price nearly tripled (intraday)
on its first day of trading. But, as the arrival of countless hot IPOs in the
years that followed proved, common sense failed to produce results for some
time.
Point being, the contrarian conditions that made precious metals a strong
buy in the late 1990s have long vanished. Instead what we have today is a bull
market in gold and other commodities that is being fueled, in part, by the
greater fool theory. Akin to the IPOs that followed Netscape, investors have
watched commodities perform well and many have decided that they want to participate.
Higher prices beget higher prices as participation expands regardless of the
fundamentals. The only question is whether or not even more inflows are around
the corner.
In short, while I believe that $1,000 ounce gold will come to resemble a top
more so than a launch pad, it may be important to remember that I regarded
Netscape as pure mania only to watch the insanity continue for nearly 5-years
afterwards. In other words, gold could continue to attract investors much longer
than most think possible, and $1,000 ounce could be the headline grabber that
opens the floodgates.
Needless to say, one of the major problems with definitively coining precious
metals a bubble is that Bernanke appears far removed from the inflationary
attitude his Fed has produced. Bernanke logic says that the Fed has the power
to immediately restore some confidence in USD by credibly threatening to attack
monetary inflation. Question is, when will Bernanke, fixated on stimulating,
switch focus?
|