|
The word "inflation" covers two different concepts, and it's important to
keep them separate. One concept is monetary inflation, which is when the supply
of money increases faster than the supply of goods and services. The other
concept is price inflation, which is an increase in the overall level of prices
for goods and services.
The relationship between the two is the relationship of cause and effect.
Monetary inflation causes price inflation. But while almost everyone sees price
inflation when it happens, few people notice the monetary inflation that is
causing it. And so they tend to blame the producers of goods and services for
higher prices -- rather than the money-creating government that is the true
culprit.
And make no mistake, as government spending continues on a steep ascent, piling
up debt, there is no question that the government has to continue creating
money like there's no tomorrow. This situation is not unique to the U.S. Quite
the opposite: the adoption of fiat monetary systems is now universal.
The results of over three decades of unhindered monetary creation are increasingly
being felt in a rising tide of price inflation, whether it be the 7.4% increase
in producer prices reported by the U.S. in the most recent quarter, or the
news just out of China that consumer price inflation now tops 8% and is worsening… or,
in the most extreme example, Zimbabwe, where the utter lack of restraint by
an insane dictator now burdens that economy with an inflation rate of over
100,000% annually.
The Casey Research Global Inflation Survey
To get a better sense of things, Casey Research recently conducted a survey
of the world's top 30 economies, broken down on a region-by-region basis. The
snapshot below offers a glimpse at the big picture.
Global Overview
January 2006 - January 2008

(To receive the full 38-page report, click
here)
Commodities on the Rise
Most pundits focus on commodities as a central culprit in today's higher price
inflation. Why are commodity prices rising? There are many reasons, most importantly:
supply and demand fundamentals, speculation and a weakening U.S. dollar, the "universal
currency" in which oil, gold and many other commodities are priced.
Of those factors, supply and demand and speculation are fairly fluid. Which
is to say they can vary over time based on politics (a threat to cut off oil
sales by Venezuela, a war in the Middle East, legislation favoring biofuel
production) or for more technical reasons (power shortages impacting mining
in South Africa, or the shutdown of the Gulf of Mexico during a hurricane).
This relatively short-term variability largely neutralizes the value of these
factors as predictors of future inflation. Simply put: who can know the unknowable?
Instead, we look to longer-term trends. In that regard, two are apparent.
The first has to do with the concept of "peak" commodities. While it has been
Marion King Hubbert's theory of Peak Oil that has received the most attention,
credible arguments can also be made for peak metal (the dearth of major new
discoveries), and even peak food. While these arguments have merit, they were
beyond the scope of our survey, other than noting them as potentially rising
in significance over time.
The second long-term trend is, in our view, of immediate consequence and worth
a more detailed discussion: per above, the limitations and risks inherent in
the fiat monetary systems now in universal favor around the world. It is this
fiat monetary regime - the attempt to manage monetary policy based on flexible
guidelines, and without the anchor previously provided by a gold standard -
that we believe is the single most important driver of the rising price inflation
now apparent around the world.
Losing Control
Simply, while the central banks of a handful of countries are (just) managing
to contain inflation through restrained monetary and fiscal policy, the vast
majority are finding the task politically inexpedient and are losing control.
While we may point with some well-deserved derision at Mr. Mugabe's comedic
attempts to paper over his inflation with yet more paper, all nations are currently
making the same errors, albeit at differing levels of failure.
To understand this point, we share a simple but accurate way of thinking about
inflation as the result of too much money chasing too few goods. On that front,
the chart just below paints a picture of the largely unfettered global growth
in money since the early 1970s plotted against industrial production, a proxy
for "goods" in their many varieties.

That chart begins to get under the hood of the problem, but one further view
is necessary to understand what happened in the early 1970s that unleashed
the tidal wave of money. The chart below presents a ratio of the above two
measures, and includes a marker indicating President Nixon's canceling of the
link between the U.S. dollar and gold in 1971 as the likely trigger. Once this
anchor was removed, all that remained was a pure fiat monetary system.

While canceling the gold standard was a U.S. policy decision, its impact was
felt around the world. That is because of the historic Bretton Woods agreement
struck between representatives of over 40 countries in 1944, as World War II
came to an end.
Leveraging its position as "last man standing" following the devastating war,
the U.S. pushed forward a wide-ranging set of agreements -- the net result
being that, from that point forward, the U.S. dollar would be the de facto global
reserve currency, with all the nations of the world pegging their currencies
to the dollar. New institutions, including the International Monetary Fund
and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, were fathered
at Bretton Woods, but they were nothing more than enforcers for the new regime,
ensuring that the other countries stayed in line, buying and selling dollars
as needed to maintain a stable peg.
For its part, the U.S. guaranteed gold convertibility at $35 "forever."
But as is inevitable when dealing with governments, "forever" really means "for
as long as it is politically expedient." When it became inconvenient, in the
late 1960s when the French under Charles de Gaulle decided that they'd prefer
to have the gold, Nixon canceled convertibility.
Once President Nixon canceled that convertibility, which took effect in 1971,
the world's central bankers, left with no other immediately obvious or more
viable alternative, continued using the U.S. dollar as a key component of their
reserves. It also continued to be used in international trade, to price globally
traded commodities, such as oil. Yet the end of gold convertibility represented
a fundamental change; from that point forward the creation of U.S. dollars
and, by extension, all of the world's currencies, was restrained by nothing
more than political expediency.
It is our contention that the size of the politically motivated governmental
spending, spending which has no "hard" limiting factor or defined discipline,
will continue apace and, in fact, significantly worsen due to compounding interest
on government borrowing and the coming wave of irrevocable social commitments
- on Social Security and Medicare in the U.S., for example. Against the backdrop
of a global fiat monetary regime, the only limitation to government spending
is that which the politicians believe will be politically unacceptable to a
population. This is, generally speaking, no real limitation at all, given that
the public is now apathetic about, and numb to, the real world implications
of large numbers.
Inflation: Baked in the Cake
In light of the cause and effect between monetary inflation and price inflation,
and given the clear findings in our Global Inflation Survey, we can
only conclude that inflation in both its commonly understood forms is now baked
into the proverbial cake.
As investors, that keeps us focused on gold, the world's longest-serving form
of money and an investment we have been profitably beating the drum about since
1999. Importantly, a quick scan now finds that gold is rising against a large
number of currencies. This is a very useful view of the current inflation trend
in that it demonstrates that the trend has expanded considerably beyond just
a weakening U.S. dollar, and is now affecting fiat currencies around the world,
almost without exception.
Are we seeing the end of the experiment in fiat monetary systems? It's too
early to say one way or another, but it's not too late to shift at least some
percentage of your portfolio into gold and, for leverage, gold shares.
The above was excerpted from the Casey Research Global Inflation Survey.
The full 38-page survey, which includes commentary by Casey Research Chairman
Doug Casey and an interview on the inflation/deflation debate with Casey
Research Chief Economist Bud Conrad, is available on request. Click
here to request your copy now.
|